{"title":"A systemized strategy to reduce door‐to‐puncture time using the <scp>ELVO</scp> screen: “Code <scp>AIS</scp>”","authors":"Hiroyasu Inoue, Yusuke Nishikawa, Masahiro Oomura, Tomonori Hattori, Yuki Hayashi, Tomoyasu Yamanaka, Mitsuru Uchida, Yoko Taniguchi, Kengo Suzuki, Yuta Madokoro, Toyohiro Sato, Teppei Fujioka, Masayuki Mizuno, Shoji Kawashima, Kenji Okita, Mitsuhito Mase, Noriyuki Matsukawa","doi":"10.1111/ncn3.12778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background A shorter onset‐to recanalization (O2R) time in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) results in better outcomes. Thus, we should reduce the door‐to‐puncture (D2P) time. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of a triage system named “Code AIS.” We adopted the emergency large vessel occlusion (ELVO) screen as a screening test. Methods Using the ELVO screening test, Code AIS was invoked when ≥1 positive results were obtained without witnessed seizures. The Code AIS system requires the assembly of neurologists, neurosurgeons, and an endovascular team in the emergency department before a patient arrives at the hospital. In total, 104 consecutive patients who underwent thrombectomy after emergency transport from January 2015 to December 2022 were included. The Code AIS system was initiated on February 17, 2022, and patients were divided into the pre‐Code AIS and Code AIS era groups. D2P time, outcome, and other parameters were compared between the groups. Results Eighty‐eight and 16 cases were in the pre‐Code AIS and Code AIS era groups, respectively. Background factors, including age, sex, and etiology, did not differ between the groups. The median (interquartile range) time of D2P in the Code AIS era was 60 (41–102) min and significantly shortened compared to 135 (109–161) min in the pre‐Code AIS era ( p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) improved significantly from 33% (pre‐Code AIS era) to 63% (Code AIS era) ( p = 0.047). Conclusion Using Code AIS, we succeeded in shortening D2P time and improving patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19154,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Background A shorter onset‐to recanalization (O2R) time in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) results in better outcomes. Thus, we should reduce the door‐to‐puncture (D2P) time. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of a triage system named “Code AIS.” We adopted the emergency large vessel occlusion (ELVO) screen as a screening test. Methods Using the ELVO screening test, Code AIS was invoked when ≥1 positive results were obtained without witnessed seizures. The Code AIS system requires the assembly of neurologists, neurosurgeons, and an endovascular team in the emergency department before a patient arrives at the hospital. In total, 104 consecutive patients who underwent thrombectomy after emergency transport from January 2015 to December 2022 were included. The Code AIS system was initiated on February 17, 2022, and patients were divided into the pre‐Code AIS and Code AIS era groups. D2P time, outcome, and other parameters were compared between the groups. Results Eighty‐eight and 16 cases were in the pre‐Code AIS and Code AIS era groups, respectively. Background factors, including age, sex, and etiology, did not differ between the groups. The median (interquartile range) time of D2P in the Code AIS era was 60 (41–102) min and significantly shortened compared to 135 (109–161) min in the pre‐Code AIS era ( p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) improved significantly from 33% (pre‐Code AIS era) to 63% (Code AIS era) ( p = 0.047). Conclusion Using Code AIS, we succeeded in shortening D2P time and improving patient outcomes.