Efficacy and safety of modified Atkins diet therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy in children and adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1111/ncn3.12791
Nobel Budiputra, C. L. Budiputri, Mary Christina Elsa
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of modified Atkins diet therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy in children and adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Nobel Budiputra, C. L. Budiputri, Mary Christina Elsa","doi":"10.1111/ncn3.12791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diet‐based treatments have been proposed for drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE), and the Modified Atkins Diet (MAD) is an alternative. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MAD as an adjunctive therapy for reducing seizures in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy.A literature search was done on six databases. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included, comparing DRE patients of all ages on standard antiseizure medications (ASD) who received MAD compared to no‐dietary or other dietary interventions. The outcomes are the seizure frequency reduction and the adverse events. Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool and GRADE were used to assess study quality and the overall certainty of evidence. The effect size of the efficacy of MAD was computed as risk ratio (95% CI). Subgroup analysis based on each type of comparator was done.Ten RCT studies (905 participants) were included, comparing MAD to no dietary intervention, ketogenic diet (KD), and low glycemic index treatment (LGIT). Overall, MAD is constantly and significantly more efficacious than no dietary intervention in reducing seizures ≥50% (RR 7.90, 95% CI 4.59–13.62), ≥90% (RR 4.61, 95% CI 2.05–10.36), and inducing complete seizure‐free (RR 7.79, 95% 2.61–23.22) with high certainty. Other dietary therapies and MAD did not differ significantly from one another in terms of efficacy. The risk of adverse events in MAD is insignificantly higher than in others (RR 1.19, 95% 0.92–1.55).The Modified Atkins Diet has better seizure reduction than no diet intervention but is comparable to other dietary interventions with a negligible increased risk of adverse events.","PeriodicalId":19154,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"59 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diet‐based treatments have been proposed for drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE), and the Modified Atkins Diet (MAD) is an alternative. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MAD as an adjunctive therapy for reducing seizures in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy.A literature search was done on six databases. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included, comparing DRE patients of all ages on standard antiseizure medications (ASD) who received MAD compared to no‐dietary or other dietary interventions. The outcomes are the seizure frequency reduction and the adverse events. Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool and GRADE were used to assess study quality and the overall certainty of evidence. The effect size of the efficacy of MAD was computed as risk ratio (95% CI). Subgroup analysis based on each type of comparator was done.Ten RCT studies (905 participants) were included, comparing MAD to no dietary intervention, ketogenic diet (KD), and low glycemic index treatment (LGIT). Overall, MAD is constantly and significantly more efficacious than no dietary intervention in reducing seizures ≥50% (RR 7.90, 95% CI 4.59–13.62), ≥90% (RR 4.61, 95% CI 2.05–10.36), and inducing complete seizure‐free (RR 7.79, 95% 2.61–23.22) with high certainty. Other dietary therapies and MAD did not differ significantly from one another in terms of efficacy. The risk of adverse events in MAD is insignificantly higher than in others (RR 1.19, 95% 0.92–1.55).The Modified Atkins Diet has better seizure reduction than no diet intervention but is comparable to other dietary interventions with a negligible increased risk of adverse events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良阿特金斯饮食疗法治疗儿童和成人耐药性癫痫的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
针对耐药性癫痫(DRE)提出了基于饮食的治疗方法,而改良阿特金斯饮食法(MAD)是一种替代疗法。本研究旨在评估 MAD 作为辅助疗法减少耐药性癫痫患者癫痫发作的有效性和安全性。研究纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)研究,这些研究比较了服用标准抗癫痫药物(ASD)的所有年龄段的耐药癫痫患者接受 MAD 与不使用饮食或其他饮食干预措施的情况。研究结果包括癫痫发作频率的降低和不良事件的发生。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 GRADE 评估研究质量和证据的总体确定性。MAD 疗效的效应大小以风险比(95% CI)计算。共纳入了 10 项 RCT 研究(905 名参与者),将 MAD 与无饮食干预、生酮饮食(KD)和低血糖指数治疗(LGIT)进行了比较。总体而言,在减少癫痫发作≥50%(RR 7.90,95% CI 4.59-13.62)、≥90%(RR 4.61,95% CI 2.05-10.36)和诱导完全无癫痫发作(RR 7.79,95% 2.61-23.22)方面,MAD的疗效持续显著高于无饮食干预,且确定性高。其他饮食疗法和 MAD 在疗效方面没有显著差异。改良阿特金斯饮食疗法减少癫痫发作的效果优于无饮食干预疗法,但与其他饮食干预疗法相比,其不良事件风险的增加微乎其微(RR 1.19,95% 0.92-1.55)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Systemic association of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease: A systematic review of literature Reduction rate of anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody titer levels is an early prognostic indicator for myasthenia gravis Focal 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A report of two cases A rare presentation of unilateral posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following a trivial head trauma Efficacy and safety of modified Atkins diet therapy for drug‐resistant epilepsy in children and adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1