Role of Effective Monitoring and Evaluation in Promoting Good Governance in Public Institutions

IF 5.2 1区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.5539/par.v12n2p48
Nor Ali Mohamed, Dayah Abdi Kulmie
{"title":"Role of Effective Monitoring and Evaluation in Promoting Good Governance in Public Institutions","authors":"Nor Ali Mohamed, Dayah Abdi Kulmie","doi":"10.5539/par.v12n2p48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the impact of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) on the promotion of good governance in public institutions. The main objectives were to evaluate how accountability, management decision-making, and organizational learning contribute to good governance. The research design used for this study was correlational, with data collected through a questionnaire administered to 115 respondents from the Ministry of Interior, Federal Affairs, and Reconciliation. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, revealing that accountability, management decision-making, and organizational learning as M&E tools play a significant role in advancing good governance within public institutions. However, these three M&E elements only demonstrate a moderate positive correlation with good governance. In conclusion, it is evident that M&E can serve as a crucial catalyst for promoting effective practices of good governance within public institutions. Moreover, this text underscores the imperative for the institutionalization, financing, and strategic placement of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in order to fully capitalize on its capabilities. The investigation proposes that M&E should transcend being a mere tool for meeting regulatory obligations and should instead be integrated into policy formulation, planning procedures, and service provision. By doing so, organizations can acquire valuable perspectives into their endeavors and achievements that will inform judicious decision-making based on solid evidence.","PeriodicalId":48366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v12n2p48","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the impact of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) on the promotion of good governance in public institutions. The main objectives were to evaluate how accountability, management decision-making, and organizational learning contribute to good governance. The research design used for this study was correlational, with data collected through a questionnaire administered to 115 respondents from the Ministry of Interior, Federal Affairs, and Reconciliation. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, revealing that accountability, management decision-making, and organizational learning as M&E tools play a significant role in advancing good governance within public institutions. However, these three M&E elements only demonstrate a moderate positive correlation with good governance. In conclusion, it is evident that M&E can serve as a crucial catalyst for promoting effective practices of good governance within public institutions. Moreover, this text underscores the imperative for the institutionalization, financing, and strategic placement of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in order to fully capitalize on its capabilities. The investigation proposes that M&E should transcend being a mere tool for meeting regulatory obligations and should instead be integrated into policy formulation, planning procedures, and service provision. By doing so, organizations can acquire valuable perspectives into their endeavors and achievements that will inform judicious decision-making based on solid evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效监测和评价在促进公共机构善治中的作用
本研究考察了监测和评价(M&E)对促进公共机构善治的影响。主要目标是评估问责制、管理决策和组织学习如何有助于良好的治理。本研究使用的研究设计是相关的,通过问卷调查收集的数据来自内政部,联邦事务和和解部的115名受访者。使用SPSS软件进行数据分析,揭示了问责制、管理决策和组织学习作为管理工具在推进公共机构的良好治理方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这三个M&E元素只显示出与良好治理适度的正相关。总之,很明显,管理和管理可以作为促进公共机构内善治的有效做法的关键催化剂。此外,本文强调必须将监测和评价制度化、供资和战略性安置,以便充分利用其能力。调查建议,管理和评估不应仅仅作为满足监管义务的工具,而应整合到政策制定、规划程序和服务提供中。通过这样做,组织可以对他们的努力和成就获得有价值的观点,这将根据确凿的证据为明智的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory serves as a bridge between public administration or public management scholarship and public policy studies. The Journal aims to provide in-depth analysis of developments in the organizational, administrative, and policy sciences as they apply to government and governance. Each issue brings you critical perspectives and cogent analyses, serving as an outlet for the best theoretical and research work in the field. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory is the official journal of the Public Management Research Association.
期刊最新文献
The professional profile, competence, and responsiveness of senior bureaucrats: a paired survey experiment with citizens and elite respondents A reputational perspective on structural reforms: How media reputations are related to the structural reform likelihood of public agencies Making Administrative Work Matter in Public Service Delivery: A Lens for Linking Practice with the Purpose of Office Gendered Administrative Burden: Regulating Gendered Bodies, Labor, and Identity Procedural Politicking for What? Bureaucratic Reputation and Democratic Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1