Does intergenerational educational mobility vary by sexual identity? A comparative analysis of five OECD countries

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY European Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcad062
Diederik Boertien, Francisco Perales, Léa Pessin
{"title":"Does intergenerational educational mobility vary by sexual identity? A comparative analysis of five OECD countries","authors":"Diederik Boertien, Francisco Perales, Léa Pessin","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcad062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lesbian, gay and bisexual people are disadvantaged in terms of health and socio-economic status compared with heterosexual people, yet findings pertaining to educational outcomes vary depending on the specific identity and gender considered. This study delves into these unexplained findings by applying a social-stratification lens, thereby providing an account of how intergenerational educational mobility varies by sexual identity. To accomplish this, we use representative data from five OECD countries and a regression-based empirical specification relying on coarsened exact matching. We find that gay and lesbian people have higher educational attainment than heterosexual people in all five countries and that these higher levels of education stem from greater rates of upward educational mobility among gay/lesbian people. There were, however, few differences between heterosexual and bisexual people. Variation across countries emerged when analyses were stratified by gender, with higher rates of upward mobility observed for gay men in Australia, Chile, the United Kingdom, and the United States and lesbian women in Australia and Germany. Overall, our results align with previous claims that education can be a strategy for gay/lesbian people to avoid actual or anticipated discrimination. However, variation in these patterns across groups suggests that other mechanisms may also be at play.","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Lesbian, gay and bisexual people are disadvantaged in terms of health and socio-economic status compared with heterosexual people, yet findings pertaining to educational outcomes vary depending on the specific identity and gender considered. This study delves into these unexplained findings by applying a social-stratification lens, thereby providing an account of how intergenerational educational mobility varies by sexual identity. To accomplish this, we use representative data from five OECD countries and a regression-based empirical specification relying on coarsened exact matching. We find that gay and lesbian people have higher educational attainment than heterosexual people in all five countries and that these higher levels of education stem from greater rates of upward educational mobility among gay/lesbian people. There were, however, few differences between heterosexual and bisexual people. Variation across countries emerged when analyses were stratified by gender, with higher rates of upward mobility observed for gay men in Australia, Chile, the United Kingdom, and the United States and lesbian women in Australia and Germany. Overall, our results align with previous claims that education can be a strategy for gay/lesbian people to avoid actual or anticipated discrimination. However, variation in these patterns across groups suggests that other mechanisms may also be at play.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代际教育流动性是否因性别认同而异?五个经合组织国家的比较分析
与异性恋者相比,女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者在健康和社会经济地位方面处于不利地位,但有关教育成果的研究结果因所考虑的特定身份和性别而异。本研究通过运用社会分层的视角深入研究了这些无法解释的发现,从而提供了代际教育流动性如何因性别认同而变化的解释。为了做到这一点,我们使用来自五个经合组织国家的代表性数据和基于回归的经验规范,依赖于粗糙的精确匹配。我们发现,在所有五个国家中,同性恋者的受教育程度都高于异性恋者,而这些较高的受教育程度源于同性恋者中更高的向上教育流动性。然而,异性恋者和双性恋者之间几乎没有差异。当按性别分层分析时,不同国家之间的差异出现了,澳大利亚、智利、英国和美国的男同性恋者和澳大利亚和德国的女同性恋者向上流动的比例更高。总的来说,我们的研究结果与之前的说法一致,即教育可以成为同性恋者避免实际或预期歧视的一种策略。然而,这些模式在不同群体之间的差异表明,其他机制也可能在起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
期刊最新文献
School composition and academic decisions Family structure and policy contexts: implications for tertiary education attainment in 25 European countries Steeper at the top: cognitive ability and earnings in Finland and Norway Online calls for protest and offline mobilization in autocracies: evidence from the 2017 Dey Protests in Iran Intensity of educational expansion: a key factor in explaining educational inequality across regions and cohorts in Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1