Effect of Double Povidone-Iodine Wash on Rate of Positive Donor Corneoscleral Rim Cultures: A 7-Year Eye Bank Analysis

Tu M. Tran, Daniel Fraser, Christina L. Gillmor, Edwin Roberts, Patricia Dahl, Alessandro Meduri, Stephen C. Kaufman
{"title":"Effect of Double Povidone-Iodine Wash on Rate of Positive Donor Corneoscleral Rim Cultures: A 7-Year Eye Bank Analysis","authors":"Tu M. Tran, Daniel Fraser, Christina L. Gillmor, Edwin Roberts, Patricia Dahl, Alessandro Meduri, Stephen C. Kaufman","doi":"10.1097/ebct.0000000000000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Starting October 2018, the Eye Bank Association of America modified the national standard protocol to incorporate a double povidone-iodine (P-I) wash at the time of procurement. Purpose: To determine if double P-I wash resulted in a reduced rate of positive donor rim cultures. Methods: A comprehensive database review was performed on consecutive corneoscleral tissue handled by The Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration (New York, NY) from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of positive corneoscleral rim cultures for bacteria or fungus. Secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative infection (eg, keratitis or endophthalmitis). For analysis, statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. Results: Of 6079 corneal transplants performed, 3491 were done before implementation of double P-I wash with a total culture positive rate of 0.43%. There were 2588 corneal transplants performed after implementation of double P-I wash with a total positive culture rate of 0.23%, which is a significant reduction (Poisson regression incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.089–0.61], P = 0.007). The most common organisms preimplementation were Candida species (46.7% of culture-positive rims), whereas no candida species were isolated postimplementation (logit regression, P = 0.034). Cutibacterium acnes culture positivity rate increased postimplementation to 50.0% versus 13.3% preimplementation (logit regression, P = 0.116). The rate of postoperative infection was 1.55% and 1.00% for preimplementation and postimplementation, respectively (IRR 0.30 [95% CI, 0.18–0.50], P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of double P-I wash was associated with a decrease in the rate of positive corneoscleral donor rim cultures and a decrease in the rate of postoperative infection.","PeriodicalId":500335,"journal":{"name":"Eye Banking and Corneal Transplantation","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye Banking and Corneal Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ebct.0000000000000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Starting October 2018, the Eye Bank Association of America modified the national standard protocol to incorporate a double povidone-iodine (P-I) wash at the time of procurement. Purpose: To determine if double P-I wash resulted in a reduced rate of positive donor rim cultures. Methods: A comprehensive database review was performed on consecutive corneoscleral tissue handled by The Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration (New York, NY) from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of positive corneoscleral rim cultures for bacteria or fungus. Secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative infection (eg, keratitis or endophthalmitis). For analysis, statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. Results: Of 6079 corneal transplants performed, 3491 were done before implementation of double P-I wash with a total culture positive rate of 0.43%. There were 2588 corneal transplants performed after implementation of double P-I wash with a total positive culture rate of 0.23%, which is a significant reduction (Poisson regression incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.089–0.61], P = 0.007). The most common organisms preimplementation were Candida species (46.7% of culture-positive rims), whereas no candida species were isolated postimplementation (logit regression, P = 0.034). Cutibacterium acnes culture positivity rate increased postimplementation to 50.0% versus 13.3% preimplementation (logit regression, P = 0.116). The rate of postoperative infection was 1.55% and 1.00% for preimplementation and postimplementation, respectively (IRR 0.30 [95% CI, 0.18–0.50], P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of double P-I wash was associated with a decrease in the rate of positive corneoscleral donor rim cultures and a decrease in the rate of postoperative infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双聚维酮碘洗涤对供体角膜缘培养阳性率的影响:一项7年眼库分析
简介:从2018年10月开始,美国眼库协会修改了国家标准方案,在采购时加入了双重聚维酮碘(P-I)洗涤。目的:确定两次P-I洗涤是否导致供体边缘培养阳性率降低。方法:对The Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration (New York, NY)于2015年1月至2021年12月处理的连续角膜巩膜组织进行全面的数据库回顾。主要结果是角膜巩膜边缘细菌或真菌培养阳性的比率。次要结局包括术后感染率(如角膜炎或眼内炎)。为了进行分析,统计显著性确定为P <0.05. 结果:6079例角膜移植手术中,双P-I冲洗前3491例,总培养阳性率为0.43%。双P- i洗涤后角膜移植2588例,总阳性培养率0.23%,显著降低(泊松回归发生率比[IRR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.089-0.61], P = 0.007)。植入前最常见的菌种为念珠菌(46.7%),植入后未检出念珠菌(logit回归,P = 0.034)。痤疮表皮杆菌培养阳性率提高到50.0%,而实施前为13.3% (logit回归,P = 0.116)。实施前和实施后的术后感染率分别为1.55%和1.00% (IRR 0.30 [95% CI, 0.18-0.50], P <0.001)。结论:双P-I洗涤的使用与角膜巩膜供体缘培养阳性率的降低和术后感染率的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eye Bank Association of America Medical Standards 2023 Coniochaeta hoffmannii and mutabilis Invasive Fungal Keratitis: A Case Series and Literature Review Identification and Management of a Central Type 2 Big Bubble in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Effect of Double Povidone-Iodine Wash on Rate of Positive Donor Corneoscleral Rim Cultures: A 7-Year Eye Bank Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1