Is This Us? Perceived Realism and Learning Outcomes of Entertainment Media Portrayals of Transracial Adoption

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2023.2263919
Chelsea E. Moss, T. Franklin Waddell
{"title":"Is This Us? Perceived Realism and Learning Outcomes of Entertainment Media Portrayals of Transracial Adoption","authors":"Chelsea E. Moss, T. Franklin Waddell","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2263919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDespite the increase in media portrayals of transracial adoption, little is understood about how viewers perceive these portrayals. Therefore, 36 interviews were conducted (20 with transracially adoptive parents and 16 with non-transracially-adoptive parents) to discover the perceived realism and learning outcomes of three entertainment transracial adoption portrayals. While transracially adoptive parents were generally more inclined to deem the clips realistic, the two groups reported similar elements of realism/unrealism. In line with social cognitive theory, several learning outcomes were reported by both groups of parents in addition to anticipated positive and negative effects of these portrayals. Results extend the applicability of perceived realism to transracial adoption portrayal and highlight nuances of social cognitive theory and the extended elaboration likelihood model among adoptive and biological parents.KEYWORDS: Family portrayalperceived realismsocial cognitive theorytransracial adoption Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsChelsea E. MossChelsea E. Moss is a doctoral candidate in the College of Journalism and Communications at the University of Florida. Her research interests are at the intersection of family communication and entertainment media.T. Franklin WaddellT. Franklin Waddell is an Associate Professor in the College of Journalism and Communications at the University of Florida. His research interests are at the intersection of new technology and online storytelling including work related to automated news, the psychology of online comments, and the effects of social television.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2263919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite the increase in media portrayals of transracial adoption, little is understood about how viewers perceive these portrayals. Therefore, 36 interviews were conducted (20 with transracially adoptive parents and 16 with non-transracially-adoptive parents) to discover the perceived realism and learning outcomes of three entertainment transracial adoption portrayals. While transracially adoptive parents were generally more inclined to deem the clips realistic, the two groups reported similar elements of realism/unrealism. In line with social cognitive theory, several learning outcomes were reported by both groups of parents in addition to anticipated positive and negative effects of these portrayals. Results extend the applicability of perceived realism to transracial adoption portrayal and highlight nuances of social cognitive theory and the extended elaboration likelihood model among adoptive and biological parents.KEYWORDS: Family portrayalperceived realismsocial cognitive theorytransracial adoption Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsChelsea E. MossChelsea E. Moss is a doctoral candidate in the College of Journalism and Communications at the University of Florida. Her research interests are at the intersection of family communication and entertainment media.T. Franklin WaddellT. Franklin Waddell is an Associate Professor in the College of Journalism and Communications at the University of Florida. His research interests are at the intersection of new technology and online storytelling including work related to automated news, the psychology of online comments, and the effects of social television.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是我们吗?感知现实主义和跨种族收养的娱乐媒体描绘的学习成果
尽管媒体对跨种族收养的描述越来越多,但人们对观众如何看待这些描述知之甚少。因此,我们进行了36次访谈(20次与跨种族养父母,16次与非跨种族养父母),以发现三种娱乐跨种族收养描述的感知真实性和学习结果。虽然跨种族的养父母通常更倾向于认为这些片段是现实的,但两组人报告的现实/非现实元素相似。根据社会认知理论,除了预期的正面和负面影响外,两组家长还报告了一些学习成果。结果扩展了感知现实主义对跨种族收养描述的适用性,并突出了社会认知理论和养父母和亲生父母之间的扩展细化可能性模型的细微差别。关键词:家庭刻画;感知现实主义;社会认知理论;本文作者chelsea E. Moss是佛罗里达大学新闻与传播学院的博士候选人。主要研究方向为家庭传播与娱乐媒体的交叉。富兰克林WaddellT。富兰克林·瓦德尔(Franklin Waddell)是佛罗里达大学新闻与传播学院副教授。他的研究兴趣是新技术和网络叙事的交叉,包括与自动新闻相关的工作,在线评论的心理学,以及社交电视的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1