Green-based supplier selection using BWM and VIKOR methods in the Indonesian manufacturing sector

Yudam Alkolid, V. Reza Bayu Kurniawan, Syamsul Ma'arif, Nerda Zura Zaibidi, Norfaridatul Akmaliah Othman
{"title":"Green-based supplier selection using BWM and VIKOR methods in the Indonesian manufacturing sector","authors":"Yudam Alkolid, V. Reza Bayu Kurniawan, Syamsul Ma'arif, Nerda Zura Zaibidi, Norfaridatul Akmaliah Othman","doi":"10.21831/jeatech.v4i2.62852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of green-based suppliers remains a challenge for manufacturing firms in Indonesia. In today's business landscape, it is crucial to consider green aspects as part of sustainability practices when choosing suppliers. However, there is a limited number of studies providing frameworks for selecting suppliers based on green factors, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to propose a framework for selecting suppliers using multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. A case study was conducted in an Indonesian metal manufacturing company that considers carbon reduction and incorporates traditional supplier selection factors such as quality, cost, and capacity. The study integrated two MCDM techniques, namely the best-worst method (BWM) and Višekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR), to evaluate and select green-based suppliers. BWM was employed to determine the weights of the criteria, while VIKOR ranked the suppliers. Seven criteria were identified, including cost (C1), quality (C2), delivery time (C3), technology application (C4), compliance with environmental regulations (C5), green practice certification (C6), and green efforts (C7). Nine suppliers were screened and ranked accordingly. The results indicate that quality, delivery time, and cost are the top three ranked criteria based on their importance. Further, this study includes nine suppliers in which supplier S7 demonstrates the best performance compared to the others. This study highlights that in Indonesia, most organizations tend to prioritize traditional criteria, while green factors are still overlooked. However, the company examined in this study has taken the initiative to include environmental factors in its decision-making process. The findings of this study contribute to the development of a framework for selecting green suppliers in a developing country context.","PeriodicalId":8524,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jeatech.v4i2.62852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of green-based suppliers remains a challenge for manufacturing firms in Indonesia. In today's business landscape, it is crucial to consider green aspects as part of sustainability practices when choosing suppliers. However, there is a limited number of studies providing frameworks for selecting suppliers based on green factors, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to propose a framework for selecting suppliers using multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. A case study was conducted in an Indonesian metal manufacturing company that considers carbon reduction and incorporates traditional supplier selection factors such as quality, cost, and capacity. The study integrated two MCDM techniques, namely the best-worst method (BWM) and Višekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR), to evaluate and select green-based suppliers. BWM was employed to determine the weights of the criteria, while VIKOR ranked the suppliers. Seven criteria were identified, including cost (C1), quality (C2), delivery time (C3), technology application (C4), compliance with environmental regulations (C5), green practice certification (C6), and green efforts (C7). Nine suppliers were screened and ranked accordingly. The results indicate that quality, delivery time, and cost are the top three ranked criteria based on their importance. Further, this study includes nine suppliers in which supplier S7 demonstrates the best performance compared to the others. This study highlights that in Indonesia, most organizations tend to prioritize traditional criteria, while green factors are still overlooked. However, the company examined in this study has taken the initiative to include environmental factors in its decision-making process. The findings of this study contribute to the development of a framework for selecting green suppliers in a developing country context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印尼制造业中使用BWM和VIKOR方法进行绿色供应商选择
对于印尼的制造企业来说,选择绿色供应商仍然是一个挑战。在当今的商业环境中,在选择供应商时,将绿色方面作为可持续发展实践的一部分是至关重要的。然而,提供基于绿色因素选择供应商框架的研究数量有限,特别是在发展中国家。本研究旨在提出一个使用多标准决策(MCDM)技术选择供应商的框架。我们在印度尼西亚的一家金属制造公司进行了一个案例研究,该公司考虑了碳减排,并结合了传统的供应商选择因素,如质量、成本和产能。该研究结合了两种MCDM技术,即最佳-最差法(BWM)和Višekriterijumsko kompromno Rangiranje (VIKOR),来评估和选择绿色供应商。采用BWM确定各指标的权重,采用VIKOR对供应商进行排序。确定了7个标准,包括成本(C1)、质量(C2)、交货时间(C3)、技术应用(C4)、符合环境法规(C5)、绿色实践认证(C6)和绿色努力(C7)。对9家供应商进行了筛选和排名。结果表明,质量、交货时间和成本是最重要的三个标准。此外,本研究包括9家供应商,其中供应商S7与其他供应商相比表现最佳。这项研究强调,在印度尼西亚,大多数组织倾向于优先考虑传统标准,而绿色因素仍然被忽视。然而,在本研究中审查的公司已经主动将环境因素纳入其决策过程。本研究的结果有助于发展中国家环境下绿色供应商选择框架的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fatigue Analysis of Engine Blade Structure Considering Thermal Loads Feature Extraction Based Machine Learning Approach for Bone Cancer Detection Design of brake failure control on motorcycle disc brakes through an integrated cooling system Evaluation of capacity and number of gates for delays and fuel consumption in the FTSP UII parking area Energy balance of thermal and catalytic degradation processes of plastic waste for producing alternative fuel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1