The Determinants of Early Investments in Urban School Systems in the United States

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS Education Finance and Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00403
Ethan Schmick
{"title":"The Determinants of Early Investments in Urban School Systems in the United States","authors":"Ethan Schmick","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Growth in per-pupil education spending in the United States was mostly flat until 1918, after which it increased by almost 100 percent in a brief six-year period. This is the fastest documented increase in per-pupil education spending in U.S. history. Using newly digitized biennial data on 386 of the largest urban school systems in the United States from 1900 to 1930, I investigate the origins of this spending increase. I first document that there was significant expansion in all spending and revenue categories with particularly large increases in capital expenditures, which were likely financed through borrowing. My results suggest that state education policies were largely ineffective in increasing school resources, as laws increasing state aid to local districts crowded out local receipts while compulsory schooling and English-only laws were not accompanied by increases in receipts or expenditures per pupil. Rather, I find that substantial increases in educational spending per pupil were linked to women's suffrage. Providing women with the right to vote can explain about 20 percent of the increase in per pupil spending from 1900 to 1930.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Growth in per-pupil education spending in the United States was mostly flat until 1918, after which it increased by almost 100 percent in a brief six-year period. This is the fastest documented increase in per-pupil education spending in U.S. history. Using newly digitized biennial data on 386 of the largest urban school systems in the United States from 1900 to 1930, I investigate the origins of this spending increase. I first document that there was significant expansion in all spending and revenue categories with particularly large increases in capital expenditures, which were likely financed through borrowing. My results suggest that state education policies were largely ineffective in increasing school resources, as laws increasing state aid to local districts crowded out local receipts while compulsory schooling and English-only laws were not accompanied by increases in receipts or expenditures per pupil. Rather, I find that substantial increases in educational spending per pupil were linked to women's suffrage. Providing women with the right to vote can explain about 20 percent of the increase in per pupil spending from 1900 to 1930.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国城市学校系统早期投资的决定因素
在1918年之前,美国每名学生的教育支出增长基本持平,之后在短短6年的时间里增长了近100%。这是美国历史上每名学生教育支出增长最快的记录。利用1900年至1930年间美国386个最大城市学校系统的新数字化两年一度的数据,我调查了这种支出增长的来源。我首先证明,所有支出和收入类别都有显著增长,资本支出的增幅尤其大,这可能是通过借贷融资的。我的研究结果表明,国家教育政策在增加学校资源方面基本上是无效的,因为增加国家对地方地区援助的法律挤占了地方收入,而义务教育和只讲英语的法律并没有伴随着每个学生收入或支出的增加。相反,我发现每个学生教育支出的大幅增长与妇女选举权有关。给予妇女投票权可以解释1900年至1930年间每个学生的支出增加了20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses How Well Do Professional Reference Ratings Predict Teacher Performance? The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts A Bridge to Graduation: Post-Secondary Effects of an Alternative Pathway for Students Who Fail High School Exit Exams At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1