Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections in Aggressive and Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity

Kyumin Kang, Ji Hye Jang
{"title":"Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections in Aggressive and Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity","authors":"Kyumin Kang, Ji Hye Jang","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the differences in treatment effects between primary intravitreal bevacizumab injections and ranibizumab injections in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive ROP.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 61 eyes from 32 premature infants who underwent primary intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for ROP. Patients with type 1 or aggressive ROP were divided into two groups: the intravitreal bevacizumab injection group and the ranibizumab injection group. We analyzed the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation, additional treatment, and the primary treatment success rate (cases in which retinal vessels formed to the periphery without additional treatment after the first injection).Results: In the type 1 ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 16 patients (30 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 6 patients (12 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. In the aggressive ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 5 patients (9 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 5 patients (10 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively. In both type 1 and aggressive ROP, there were no significant differences in the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation rate, or additional treatment rate depending on the type of anti-VEGF.Conclusions: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrated similar efficacy in type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP. However, because aggressive ROP required additional treatment more frequently regardless of the type of anti-VEGF used, close follow-up after the primary injection is essential.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the differences in treatment effects between primary intravitreal bevacizumab injections and ranibizumab injections in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive ROP.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 61 eyes from 32 premature infants who underwent primary intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for ROP. Patients with type 1 or aggressive ROP were divided into two groups: the intravitreal bevacizumab injection group and the ranibizumab injection group. We analyzed the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation, additional treatment, and the primary treatment success rate (cases in which retinal vessels formed to the periphery without additional treatment after the first injection).Results: In the type 1 ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 16 patients (30 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 6 patients (12 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. In the aggressive ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 5 patients (9 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 5 patients (10 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively. In both type 1 and aggressive ROP, there were no significant differences in the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation rate, or additional treatment rate depending on the type of anti-VEGF.Conclusions: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrated similar efficacy in type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP. However, because aggressive ROP required additional treatment more frequently regardless of the type of anti-VEGF used, close follow-up after the primary injection is essential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗侵袭性和1型早产儿视网膜病变的比较
目的:探讨原发性玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与雷尼单抗治疗1型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)与侵袭性ROP的疗效差异。方法:回顾性分析32例接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射治疗ROP的早产儿61只眼的病历。1型或侵袭性ROP患者分为两组:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗组和注射雷尼单抗组。我们分析了第一次注射后病变消失的时间、再激活、额外治疗和初级治疗成功率(第一次注射后视网膜血管向外周形成而未进行额外治疗的病例)。结果:在1型ROP组中,贝伐单抗注射组16例(30眼)和雷尼单抗注射组6例(12眼)的一期治疗成功率分别为100.0%和91.7%。侵袭性ROP组,贝伐单抗注射组5例(9眼)和雷尼单抗注射组5例(10眼)的一期治疗成功率分别为55.6%和60.0%。在1型和侵袭性ROP中,根据抗vegf的类型,第一次注射后病变消失的时间、再激活率或额外治疗率均无显著差异。结论:贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗1型ROP和侵袭性ROP的疗效相似。然而,由于侵袭性ROP需要更频繁的额外治疗,无论使用哪种抗vegf,在初次注射后密切随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors of Meibomian Gland Loss in Dry Eye Disease Inflammatory Factors Predicting Dry Eye Syndrome in a Model Using Osmotic Pressure Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements Between Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography and Schiempflug Coherence Interferometer Surgical Outcomes of Hammer-Chisel and Drill Techniques to Create Superior Bony Ostium During Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Intermittent Exotropia with Siblings Who Underwent Surgery by the Same Surgeon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1