Kontroverzní Jungkův bestseller Jasnější než tisíc sluncí a nacistický uranový výzkum

Q3 Arts and Humanities Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.46938/tv.2023.561
Filip Grygar
{"title":"Kontroverzní Jungkův bestseller Jasnější než tisíc sluncí a nacistický uranový výzkum","authors":"Filip Grygar","doi":"10.46938/tv.2023.561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay deals with Nazi uranium research in the context of Jungkʼs bestseller Brighter Than a Thousand Suns (1956). The first part of the article introduces the reader to Jungk himself, as well as to the historical-political context that crucially influenced his moralising positions in favour of the German uranium scientists (they did not build nuclear weapons for Hitler) and at the same time against the Allied scientists (they built nuclear weapons and used them). Based on historical sources (gradually made available since the 1970s), the second part of the study discusses the Nazi Uranium Clubʼs efforts to produce a uranium reactor and nuclear weapons. German scientists worked for the Nazi regime voluntarily and intensively and were fascinated by the research. The third part reveals the origins of the post-war legend of the supposedly innocent German scientists, their decades-long alibism, and the criticism of Jungkʼs bestseller by the Allied command, the scientists, and eventually Jungk himself, who put faith in the interviews in which German scientsts proclaimed their activities had been nothing but peaceful.","PeriodicalId":37722,"journal":{"name":"Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essay deals with Nazi uranium research in the context of Jungkʼs bestseller Brighter Than a Thousand Suns (1956). The first part of the article introduces the reader to Jungk himself, as well as to the historical-political context that crucially influenced his moralising positions in favour of the German uranium scientists (they did not build nuclear weapons for Hitler) and at the same time against the Allied scientists (they built nuclear weapons and used them). Based on historical sources (gradually made available since the 1970s), the second part of the study discusses the Nazi Uranium Clubʼs efforts to produce a uranium reactor and nuclear weapons. German scientists worked for the Nazi regime voluntarily and intensively and were fascinated by the research. The third part reveals the origins of the post-war legend of the supposedly innocent German scientists, their decades-long alibism, and the criticism of Jungkʼs bestseller by the Allied command, the scientists, and eventually Jungk himself, who put faith in the interviews in which German scientsts proclaimed their activities had been nothing but peaceful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荣克备受争议的畅销书《比一千个太阳还要明亮》和《纳粹铀研究
这篇文章是在荣克的畅销书《比一千个太阳更亮》(1956)的背景下讨论纳粹铀研究的。文章的第一部分向读者介绍荣克本人,以及对他的道德立场产生重大影响的历史政治背景,这些立场支持德国铀科学家(他们没有为希特勒制造核武器),同时反对盟军科学家(他们制造并使用核武器)。根据历史资料(自20世纪70年代以来逐渐提供),研究的第二部分讨论了纳粹铀俱乐部为生产铀反应堆和核武器所做的努力。德国科学家自愿地、密集地为纳粹政权工作,并对这项研究着迷。第三部分揭示了战后德国科学家被认为是无辜的传说的起源,他们长达数十年的不在场证明,以及盟军指挥部、科学家和荣克本人对荣克畅销书的批评,荣克本人相信德国科学家在采访中宣称他们的活动只是和平的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science
Teorie Vedy/ Theory of Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE is a peer-reviewed academic journal founded in 1969. It focuses on the inquiry into philosophical and methodological principles of scientific knowledge. It traces the interrelationship of science, technology, and society; the problems of the historical development of science and knowledge; and the interdisciplinary relations across and within Humanities, Social, Natural, and Life Sciences. Public relevance of science is also addressed. The journal publishes original research articles in English and Czech languages. Unsolicited book reviews are typically in Czech.
期刊最新文献
A Historical Interaction between Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy Cantorův diagonální důkaz Kontroverzní Jungkův bestseller Jasnější než tisíc sluncí a nacistický uranový výzkum Quentin Skinner’s Attempt to Clarify Collingwood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1