Values in Social Work and Professional Relationship Towards Users

Dragana Šćepović, Ljubo Lepir, Vesna Šućur-Janjetović
{"title":"Values in Social Work and Professional Relationship Towards Users","authors":"Dragana Šćepović, Ljubo Lepir, Vesna Šućur-Janjetović","doi":"10.51558/2490-3647.2023.8.2.791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the results of comparative empirical research conducted among social work students (N=146), who were grouped into two subsamples: students from the Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney and Melbourne (N= 71), and students from Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) from the Universities of Banja Luka, Tuzla and Sarajevo (N=75). The subject of the research was the values in social work that determine the professional attitude and ways of intervening towards the users of the social protection system, among social work students in two different educational, cultural, and social-political environments (Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina). The goal of the research was to determine whether there are differences in the attitudes and opinions of students about the values of social work, professional attitudes, and actions towards users of the social protection system, about the country of study and residence. The research was carried out using the research method (survey technique), for the needs of which a specially prepared instrument - Questionnaire (ORiSR/April 2020) was created, which examined students' attitudes about the professional relationship and measures of treatment towards users of social work services. The obtained results confirmed the assumed hypothesis that there are significant differences in students' attitudes regarding the place of study, that is, the different cultural and social circumstances in which future social workers are educated. Differences were observed in the evaluation of individual measures and forms of protection for users of social work services. Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina believe that adoption and foster care are preferable forms of protection for children without parental care, while the majority of students from Australia think that the adoption of children in same-sex unions should be allowed. Also, the obtained results showed that, even though the views of students from Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina differ on some values of social work, essential differences were not observed in the values related to satisfying the primary interest of the user, subordinating personal principles to the values of social work and social activism of social work in the community.","PeriodicalId":33261,"journal":{"name":"Drustvene i Humanisticke Studije","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drustvene i Humanisticke Studije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2023.8.2.791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents the results of comparative empirical research conducted among social work students (N=146), who were grouped into two subsamples: students from the Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney and Melbourne (N= 71), and students from Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) from the Universities of Banja Luka, Tuzla and Sarajevo (N=75). The subject of the research was the values in social work that determine the professional attitude and ways of intervening towards the users of the social protection system, among social work students in two different educational, cultural, and social-political environments (Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina). The goal of the research was to determine whether there are differences in the attitudes and opinions of students about the values of social work, professional attitudes, and actions towards users of the social protection system, about the country of study and residence. The research was carried out using the research method (survey technique), for the needs of which a specially prepared instrument - Questionnaire (ORiSR/April 2020) was created, which examined students' attitudes about the professional relationship and measures of treatment towards users of social work services. The obtained results confirmed the assumed hypothesis that there are significant differences in students' attitudes regarding the place of study, that is, the different cultural and social circumstances in which future social workers are educated. Differences were observed in the evaluation of individual measures and forms of protection for users of social work services. Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina believe that adoption and foster care are preferable forms of protection for children without parental care, while the majority of students from Australia think that the adoption of children in same-sex unions should be allowed. Also, the obtained results showed that, even though the views of students from Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina differ on some values of social work, essential differences were not observed in the values related to satisfying the primary interest of the user, subordinating personal principles to the values of social work and social activism of social work in the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会工作的价值观和对使用者的专业关系
本文介绍了对社会工作专业学生(N=146)进行比较实证研究的结果,这些学生被分为两个子样本:来自澳大利亚应用心理学学院、悉尼和墨尔本的学生(N= 71),以及来自巴尼亚卢卡大学、图兹拉大学和萨拉热窝大学的波黑学生(N=75)。这项研究的主题是社会工作中的价值观,这些价值观决定了社会工作学生在两个不同的教育、文化和社会政治环境(澳大利亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那)中对社会保护系统用户的专业态度和干预方式。该研究的目的是确定学生对社会工作的价值观、专业态度和对社会保护系统使用者的行动的态度和意见、对学习和居住国家的态度和意见是否存在差异。该研究使用研究方法(调查技术)进行,针对其需求,创建了专门准备的工具-问卷调查(ORiSR/ 2020年4月),该问卷调查了学生对专业关系的态度以及对社会工作服务用户的待遇措施。获得的结果证实了假设的假设,即学生对学习地点的态度存在显著差异,即未来社会工作者所受教育的文化和社会环境不同。在对社会工作服务使用者的个别措施和保护形式的评估中观察到差异。来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的学生认为,收养和寄养是对没有父母照顾的孩子更好的保护形式,而大多数来自澳大利亚的学生认为应该允许同性伴侣收养孩子。此外,所获得的结果表明,尽管来自澳大利亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的学生对社会工作的一些价值观的看法有所不同,但在满足用户的主要利益、个人原则服从社会工作价值观和社会工作在社区中的社会行动主义方面,并没有观察到本质的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Literary Translation in the Age of AI: Striking a Balance Between Human Expertise and Machine Power Constructivism as a Popular Musical Narrative in Serbia: Changing of Sound, Ideological and Visual Monopoly in Serbian Music Industry Overview of the Development of the Philosophy of Science in Croatia Quality of Life of Children Without Adequate Parental Care Placed in a Social Protection Institution Artlang and Idioms: Idiolang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1