Kants teleologische Überlegungen zur Menschenwürde in der Vorlesung über Naturrecht Feyerabend

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY Studia Philosophica Kantiana Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.5380/sk.v19i1.90216
Fernando Moledo
{"title":"Kants teleologische Überlegungen zur Menschenwürde in der Vorlesung über Naturrecht Feyerabend","authors":"Fernando Moledo","doi":"10.5380/sk.v19i1.90216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I deal with an argument for the foundation of human dignity that Kant sketches in the introduction to his lecture Feyerabend on natural law (1784). After presenting very briefly Kant's discussion of Achenwall's concept of value I argue that the starting point of the argument on human dignity that Kant develops in the introduction to the lecture is teleological. I discuss then the problems that such a starting point inevitably entails regarding Kant´s practical philosophy and offer an explanation as to why Kant was able to include this argument in the introduction to his lecture despite the problems it raises. Finally I claim that despite these problems the central idea of the argument reflects a fundamental idea of Kant's thought on human dignity. In support of the latter I refer to the fact that Kant turns to the same central idea of the argument some years later in his discussion of teleology developed in the Critique of Judgment (1790).","PeriodicalId":40123,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v19i1.90216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I deal with an argument for the foundation of human dignity that Kant sketches in the introduction to his lecture Feyerabend on natural law (1784). After presenting very briefly Kant's discussion of Achenwall's concept of value I argue that the starting point of the argument on human dignity that Kant develops in the introduction to the lecture is teleological. I discuss then the problems that such a starting point inevitably entails regarding Kant´s practical philosophy and offer an explanation as to why Kant was able to include this argument in the introduction to his lecture despite the problems it raises. Finally I claim that despite these problems the central idea of the argument reflects a fundamental idea of Kant's thought on human dignity. In support of the latter I refer to the fact that Kant turns to the same central idea of the argument some years later in his discussion of teleology developed in the Critique of Judgment (1790).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯特在课堂上思考"博物学家之夜"的人类尊严意识
在本文中,我将讨论康德在他的讲座《费耶阿本德论自然法》(1784)的引言中提出的关于人类尊严基础的论点。在简要介绍了康德对阿钦沃尔价值概念的讨论之后,我认为康德在讲座介绍中提出的关于人类尊严的论点的出发点是目的论的。然后,我讨论了这样一个起点不可避免地涉及康德实践哲学的问题,并提供了一个解释,为什么康德能够在他的讲座的介绍中包括这个论点,尽管它提出了问题。最后,我认为,尽管存在这些问题,但论证的中心思想反映了康德关于人类尊严思想的基本思想。为了支持后者,我提到了这样一个事实,即康德在几年后的《判断批判》(1790)中对目的论的讨论中转向了同样的论证中心思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Action irrationality, systemic practical irrationality, and a Kantian remedy the remedy in Kant Revisiting the Kantian legacy in Habermas: the philosophical project of modernity and decolonial critiques to rationality and cosmopolitanism Living Honestly and Killing Honorably. Ehre and Ehrbarkeit in the Metaphysics of Morals The Kantian view of dark representations and their function in practical life, according to the anthropological notes of the Critical Period “The taking-something-to-be-true [that] cannot be communicated”: remarks on the (lack of) communicability to understand the problem of social irrationality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1