Institutional imbalance moderating the linkage between GVC participation and economic growth: empirical evidence

Sharadendu Sharma, Rahul Arora
{"title":"Institutional imbalance moderating the linkage between GVC participation and economic growth: empirical evidence","authors":"Sharadendu Sharma, Rahul Arora","doi":"10.1108/jeas-12-2022-0271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Participation in global value chains (GVCs) is increasingly related to the economic growth of any country. The conceivable beneficial impact of GVCs on economic growth differs across countries and could be modified with the countries' domestic institutional arrangements. However, ignoring the complementarity between the components of institutional quality led to ignorance of the institutional imbalance present in the country. Hence, the primary purpose of this study is to examine the role of institutional imbalance as a moderating variable between GVC participation and economic growth from 2000 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach To address the issue of endogeneity among the variables in the model, the study employs the generalized methods of moments (GMM) as an econometric analysis method. Findings The study finds that well-functioning domestic institutions facilitate the positive impact of GVC participation on economic growth. Conversely, an increased institutional imbalance harms the relationship between GVC participation and economic growth. These findings emphasize a balanced portfolio of institutional components. It advocates the holistic development of each component to reap greater benefits for GVC participation for any country. The study highlights that the weakness in one of the components must be addressed rather than substituted by increasing the strength of another component. Research limitations/implications The policies should be framed to improve the weakest component first, followed by other components of institutional quality. Simultaneous reforms involving all the dimensions of institutional quality would smoothen the path of transforming GVCs trade to the country's economic development. Additionally, the high institutional imbalance can provide a bird's eye view to policymakers to work on specific aspects of institutional quality more rigorously. Originality/value The existing literature has used a combined measure of institutional quality as a mediator variable while measuring the impact of GVC participation on economic growth. While using a combined measure, it ignores the complementarity among its components. Assuming substitutability among various components may lead to an incorrect estimation. Using the arguments proposed by Bolen and Sobel (2020), the present study considers the existence of complementarity among various components of institutional quality. It calculates the institutional imbalance used as a moderating variable while estimating the impact of GVC participation on economic growth.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"2010 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-12-2022-0271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Participation in global value chains (GVCs) is increasingly related to the economic growth of any country. The conceivable beneficial impact of GVCs on economic growth differs across countries and could be modified with the countries' domestic institutional arrangements. However, ignoring the complementarity between the components of institutional quality led to ignorance of the institutional imbalance present in the country. Hence, the primary purpose of this study is to examine the role of institutional imbalance as a moderating variable between GVC participation and economic growth from 2000 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach To address the issue of endogeneity among the variables in the model, the study employs the generalized methods of moments (GMM) as an econometric analysis method. Findings The study finds that well-functioning domestic institutions facilitate the positive impact of GVC participation on economic growth. Conversely, an increased institutional imbalance harms the relationship between GVC participation and economic growth. These findings emphasize a balanced portfolio of institutional components. It advocates the holistic development of each component to reap greater benefits for GVC participation for any country. The study highlights that the weakness in one of the components must be addressed rather than substituted by increasing the strength of another component. Research limitations/implications The policies should be framed to improve the weakest component first, followed by other components of institutional quality. Simultaneous reforms involving all the dimensions of institutional quality would smoothen the path of transforming GVCs trade to the country's economic development. Additionally, the high institutional imbalance can provide a bird's eye view to policymakers to work on specific aspects of institutional quality more rigorously. Originality/value The existing literature has used a combined measure of institutional quality as a mediator variable while measuring the impact of GVC participation on economic growth. While using a combined measure, it ignores the complementarity among its components. Assuming substitutability among various components may lead to an incorrect estimation. Using the arguments proposed by Bolen and Sobel (2020), the present study considers the existence of complementarity among various components of institutional quality. It calculates the institutional imbalance used as a moderating variable while estimating the impact of GVC participation on economic growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度失衡调节全球价值链参与与经济增长之间的联系:经验证据
参与全球价值链与各国经济增长的关系日益密切。全球价值链对经济增长的有利影响因国而异,并可根据各国的国内制度安排加以调整。然而,由于忽视了制度质量组成部分之间的互补性,导致了对我国目前存在的制度失衡的忽视。因此,本研究的主要目的是考察2000 - 2018年制度失衡作为全球价值链参与与经济增长之间的调节变量的作用。为了解决模型中变量之间的内生性问题,本研究采用广义矩量方法(GMM)作为计量经济学分析方法。研究发现,完善的国内制度有助于促进全球价值链参与对经济增长的积极影响。相反,制度失衡加剧会损害全球价值链参与与经济增长之间的关系。这些发现强调了机构组成部分的平衡组合。倡导各组成部分统筹发展,为各国参与全球价值链带来更大利益。该研究强调,必须解决其中一个组件的弱点,而不是通过增加另一个组件的强度来取代。研究局限/影响政策的制定应首先改善最薄弱的组成部分,然后是制度质量的其他组成部分。同时,涉及制度质量各个方面的改革将使全球价值链贸易向国家经济发展转变的道路更加顺畅。此外,高度的制度失衡可以为政策制定者提供一个鸟瞰图,以便更严格地研究制度质量的具体方面。现有文献在衡量全球价值链参与对经济增长的影响时,使用了制度质量的组合度量作为中介变量。在使用组合度量时,它忽略了其组成部分之间的互补性。假设各个组成部分之间的可替代性可能导致不正确的估计。利用Bolen和Sobel(2020)提出的论点,本研究认为制度质量的各个组成部分之间存在互补性。在估计全球价值链参与对经济增长的影响时,计算制度失衡作为调节变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of ethical leadership on followers' voice: mediation of moral identity and moderation of proactive personality Do agency costs and business risk affect the corporate sustainability–financial performance relationship? Investigating nostalgia’s influence on brand love Influence of governance indicators on public debt accumulation in Africa Analysing volatility patterns in emerging markets: symmetric or asymmetric models?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1