Assessment of Ukraine’s external debt burden under geopolitical instability

Q3 Social Sciences Public and Municipal Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.06
Mila Razinkova, Natalia Nebaba, Maxim Korneyev, Tetiana Yakovenko, Anna Bohorodytska
{"title":"Assessment of Ukraine’s external debt burden under geopolitical instability","authors":"Mila Razinkova, Natalia Nebaba, Maxim Korneyev, Tetiana Yakovenko, Anna Bohorodytska","doi":"10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several specific features and circumstances can characterize Ukraine’s policy of external public debt management, and the results are not always unambiguous. The study aims to assess the effect of external public debt on Ukraine’s economy from 2014 to 2022, a period that includes the Crimea annexation, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the beginning of the open Russian military aggression. To analyze the contemporary state of public debt and assess the degree of external debt burden’s impact on the country’s economy, a factor analysis technique known as the principal components method was used. Via the STATISTICA.12 software, it was substantiated that the debt situation worsens with the growth of debt burden and solvency indicators as their values approach the thresholds. The application of the Kaiser criterion allowed the selection of the most influential indicators (principal components) for assessing the external debt burden. The eigenvalue of the first component (inflation rate) is 4.48, and it explains 50% of the variance; the second component (production of export-oriented goods) has an eigenvalue of 2.43, explaining 27% of the variance; the third component (government spending on military purposes) has an eigenvalue of 1.24, and it explains 14% of the variance.","PeriodicalId":52837,"journal":{"name":"Public and Municipal Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public and Municipal Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several specific features and circumstances can characterize Ukraine’s policy of external public debt management, and the results are not always unambiguous. The study aims to assess the effect of external public debt on Ukraine’s economy from 2014 to 2022, a period that includes the Crimea annexation, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the beginning of the open Russian military aggression. To analyze the contemporary state of public debt and assess the degree of external debt burden’s impact on the country’s economy, a factor analysis technique known as the principal components method was used. Via the STATISTICA.12 software, it was substantiated that the debt situation worsens with the growth of debt burden and solvency indicators as their values approach the thresholds. The application of the Kaiser criterion allowed the selection of the most influential indicators (principal components) for assessing the external debt burden. The eigenvalue of the first component (inflation rate) is 4.48, and it explains 50% of the variance; the second component (production of export-oriented goods) has an eigenvalue of 2.43, explaining 27% of the variance; the third component (government spending on military purposes) has an eigenvalue of 1.24, and it explains 14% of the variance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地缘政治不稳定下乌克兰外债负担评估
乌克兰的对外公共债务管理政策有几个具体的特点和情况,其结果并不总是明确的。该研究旨在评估2014年至2022年外债对乌克兰经济的影响,这一时期包括克里米亚被吞并、新冠疫情爆发以及俄罗斯公开军事侵略的开始。为了分析当前的公共债务状况并评估外债负担对国家经济的影响程度,使用了一种称为主成分法的因素分析技术。通过statistic .12软件证实,债务情况随着债务负担和偿债能力指标的增长而恶化,因为它们的值接近阈值。采用凯撒标准可以选择最具影响力的指标(主要成分)来评估外债负担。第一分量(通货膨胀率)的特征值为4.48,它解释了50%的方差;第二个组成部分(出口导向型商品的生产)的特征值为2.43,解释了27%的方差;第三个组成部分(用于军事目的的政府支出)的特征值为1.24,它解释了14%的方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public and Municipal Finance
Public and Municipal Finance Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financial security of Ukraine under martial law: Impact of macroeconomic determinants The complexity of tax regulations and principles of justice as determinants of taxpayer compliance: case of Indonesia The impact of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and organizational commitment on whistleblowing intention: A moderating role of local culture Enhancing administrative service delivery practices of local government: Experiences from Nepal Macroeconomic factors and government bond yield in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1