{"title":"Teaching Note—Working Toward an Inclusive, Antiracist, and Antioppressive Research Methods Pedagogy","authors":"Adrienne Baldwin-White","doi":"10.1080/10437797.2023.2260837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSocial work research has adopted the scientific method rooted in the hard sciences as the gold standard for understanding human behavior and creating interventions and policies for both individual and systemic change. Current methodologies are rooted in White supremacy that lack the subjectivity needed to provide space for the effects of racism and oppression to be included in studies and evidence-based practice. Social work cannot be antiracist and anti-oppressive unless it creates an inclusive research methods class that is critical of what is considered scientific rigor. This teaching note presents the current evolution of a social work research methods class to promote critical thinking around what is believed to be the gold standard of scientific research. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdrienne Baldwin-WhiteDr. Adrienne Baldwin-White, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at Virginia Commonwealth University.","PeriodicalId":17012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Education","volume":"50 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2260837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTSocial work research has adopted the scientific method rooted in the hard sciences as the gold standard for understanding human behavior and creating interventions and policies for both individual and systemic change. Current methodologies are rooted in White supremacy that lack the subjectivity needed to provide space for the effects of racism and oppression to be included in studies and evidence-based practice. Social work cannot be antiracist and anti-oppressive unless it creates an inclusive research methods class that is critical of what is considered scientific rigor. This teaching note presents the current evolution of a social work research methods class to promote critical thinking around what is believed to be the gold standard of scientific research. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAdrienne Baldwin-WhiteDr. Adrienne Baldwin-White, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at Virginia Commonwealth University.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Work Education is a refereed professional journal concerned with education in social work, and social welfare. Its purpose is to serve as a forum for creative exchange on trends, innovations, and problems relevant to social work education at the undergraduate, masters", and postgraduate levels. JSWE is published three times a year, in winter (January 15), spring/summer (May 15), and fall (September 15). It is available by subscription and is free with CSWE membership.