Operating room black box: Scrutinizer of theatre practices

Prem Kumar A, PI Pragyan Pratik, Nithya Ravichandran
{"title":"Operating room black box: Scrutinizer of theatre practices","authors":"Prem Kumar A,&nbsp;PI Pragyan Pratik,&nbsp;Nithya Ravichandran","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Adverse surgical events are a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. The cause of many such events can be attributed to interruptions in the operating room (OR), multitasking by surgeons, etc. The objective of this study was to observe the types and frequency of intraoperative workflow interruptions in our ORs.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April of 2023. An observational approach using an audio-video recording device was employed to record OR flow disruptions. One elective OR and one emergency OR under the Department of General Surgery were selected for the study. All open and laparoscopic surgeries conducted in the selected ORs were included. An Internet Protocol camera was installed in the selected ORs with a view of the entire room, including the anesthesia station. Audio-video recording was started after the first incision and stopped after closure of the surgical site.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Of the 51 cases that were studied, 45 (88.2%) were elective, and 18 (35.3%) were laparoscopic cases. They could be classified into 8 types of open procedures and 4 types of laparoscopic procedures. The mean maximum headcount inside the OR was 15.5 ± 3.6 and doors opened on average of 15.8 ± 6.0 times during a procedure. Other interruptions were surgeons attending phone calls (24, 47.1%), leaving the sterile area (21, 41.2%), technical disturbances (32, 62.7%), anesthetic interruptions (18, 35.3%), and faulty instruments (29, 56.9%). Elective procedures had a significantly higher average number of interruptions per operating hour than emergency procedures (17.5 ± 8.6 vs. 7.1 ± 2.9, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preventable factors such as faulty instruments, anesthetic interruption, and attending phone calls by the surgeon are commonly observed in ORs. They need to be addressed by timely surgical audits or the adoption of continued surveillance methods that can help take measures to minimize their occurrence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000609/pdfft?md5=f0265cdc59df263b8398af55f49aba96&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900923000609-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Adverse surgical events are a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. The cause of many such events can be attributed to interruptions in the operating room (OR), multitasking by surgeons, etc. The objective of this study was to observe the types and frequency of intraoperative workflow interruptions in our ORs.

Method

This cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April of 2023. An observational approach using an audio-video recording device was employed to record OR flow disruptions. One elective OR and one emergency OR under the Department of General Surgery were selected for the study. All open and laparoscopic surgeries conducted in the selected ORs were included. An Internet Protocol camera was installed in the selected ORs with a view of the entire room, including the anesthesia station. Audio-video recording was started after the first incision and stopped after closure of the surgical site.

Result

Of the 51 cases that were studied, 45 (88.2%) were elective, and 18 (35.3%) were laparoscopic cases. They could be classified into 8 types of open procedures and 4 types of laparoscopic procedures. The mean maximum headcount inside the OR was 15.5 ± 3.6 and doors opened on average of 15.8 ± 6.0 times during a procedure. Other interruptions were surgeons attending phone calls (24, 47.1%), leaving the sterile area (21, 41.2%), technical disturbances (32, 62.7%), anesthetic interruptions (18, 35.3%), and faulty instruments (29, 56.9%). Elective procedures had a significantly higher average number of interruptions per operating hour than emergency procedures (17.5 ± 8.6 vs. 7.1 ± 2.9, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Preventable factors such as faulty instruments, anesthetic interruption, and attending phone calls by the surgeon are commonly observed in ORs. They need to be addressed by timely surgical audits or the adoption of continued surveillance methods that can help take measures to minimize their occurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术室黑盒:手术室黑匣子:剧院实践的监督者
目的 手术不良事件是全球发病率、死亡率和残疾率的主要原因。许多此类事件的原因可归咎于手术室(OR)中的中断、外科医生的多任务处理等。本研究的目的是观察手术室中术中工作流程中断的类型和频率。本横断面研究于 2023 年 3 月至 4 月进行,采用音视频记录设备记录手术室流程中断情况。研究选择了普外科下属的一个择期手术室和一个急诊手术室。所有在选定手术室进行的开腹和腹腔镜手术均包括在内。在选定的手术室安装了网络摄像机,可以看到整个手术室,包括麻醉站。在研究的 51 个病例中,45 例(88.2%)为择期手术,18 例(35.3%)为腹腔镜手术。这些病例可分为 8 种开腹手术和 4 种腹腔镜手术。手术室内的平均最高人数为 15.5 ± 3.6,手术过程中平均开门 15.8 ± 6.0 次。其他中断包括外科医生接电话(24,47.1%)、离开无菌区(21,41.2%)、技术干扰(32,62.7%)、麻醉中断(18,35.3%)和器械故障(29,56.9%)。结论 手术室中常见的可预防因素包括器械故障、麻醉中断和外科医生的主治电话。需要通过及时的手术审计或采用持续的监控方法来解决这些问题,从而采取措施将其发生率降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life Managerial perspectives of scaling up robotic-assisted surgery in healthcare systems: A systematic literature review Minimally invasive management of parapharyngeal space tumors: Introducing a decision-making algorithm and radiologic tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1