Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.003
There have been nearly 60 years since Thomas Starzl’s first liver transplant. During this period, advancements in medical technology have progressively enabled the adoption of new methods for transplantation. Among these innovations, robotic surgery has emerged in recent decades and is gradually being integrated into transplant medicine. Robotic hepatectomy and liver implantation represent significant advancements in the field of transplant surgery. The precision and minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery offer substantial benefits for both living donors and recipients. In living donors, robotic hepatectomy reduces postoperative pain, minimizes scarring, and accelerates recovery. For liver recipients, robotic liver implantation enhances surgical accuracy, leading to better graft positioning and vascular anastomosis. Robotic systems provide more precise and maneuverable control of instruments, allowing surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater accuracy and reduced risk to patients. This review encompasses publications on minimally invasive donor liver surgery, with a specific focus on robotic liver resection in transplantation, and aims to summarize current knowledge and the development status of robotic surgery in liver transplantation, focusing on liver resection in donors and graft implantation in recipients.
{"title":"Robotic surgery in living liver donors and liver recipients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There have been nearly 60 years since Thomas Starzl’s first liver transplant. During this period, advancements in medical technology have progressively enabled the adoption of new methods for transplantation. Among these innovations, robotic surgery has emerged in recent decades and is gradually being integrated into transplant medicine. Robotic hepatectomy and liver implantation represent significant advancements in the field of transplant surgery. The precision and minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery offer substantial benefits for both living donors and recipients. In living donors, robotic hepatectomy reduces postoperative pain, minimizes scarring, and accelerates recovery. For liver recipients, robotic liver implantation enhances surgical accuracy, leading to better graft positioning and vascular anastomosis. Robotic systems provide more precise and maneuverable control of instruments, allowing surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater accuracy and reduced risk to patients. This review encompasses publications on minimally invasive donor liver surgery, with a specific focus on robotic liver resection in transplantation, and aims to summarize current knowledge and the development status of robotic surgery in liver transplantation, focusing on liver resection in donors and graft implantation in recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000458/pdfft?md5=f22cdb06606e6c4d13aa6e111b4b17f1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000458-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142164446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.002
Objectives
Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is a minimally invasive technique practiced in multiple specialties. Standard training is essential for the acquisition of RAS skills. The cost of RAS is considered to be high, which makes it a burden for institutes and unaffordable for patients. This systematic literature review (SLR) focused on the various RAS training methods applied in different surgical specialties, as well as the cost elements of RAS, and was to summarize the opportunities and challenges associated with scaling up RAS.
Methods
An SLR was carried out based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. The PubMed, EBSCO, and Scopus databases were searched for reports from January 2018 through January 2024. Full-text reviews and research articles in the English language from Asia-Pacific countries were included. Articles that outlined training and costs associated with RAS were chosen.
Results
The most common training system is the da Vinci system. The simulation technique, which includes dry-lab, wet-lab, and virtual reality training, was found to be a common and important practice. The cost of RAS encompasses the installation and maintenance costs of the robotic system, the operation theatre rent, personnel cost, surgical instrument and material cost, and other miscellaneous charges. The synthesis of SLR revealed the challenges and opportunities regarding RAS training and cost.
Conclusions
The results of this SLR will help stakeholders such as decision-makers, influencers, and end users of RAS to understand the significance of training and cost in scaling up RAS from a managerial perspective. For any healthcare innovation to reach a vast population, cost-effectiveness and standard training are crucial.
{"title":"Managerial perspectives of scaling up robotic-assisted surgery in healthcare systems: A systematic literature review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is a minimally invasive technique practiced in multiple specialties. Standard training is essential for the acquisition of RAS skills. The cost of RAS is considered to be high, which makes it a burden for institutes and unaffordable for patients. This systematic literature review (SLR) focused on the various RAS training methods applied in different surgical specialties, as well as the cost elements of RAS, and was to summarize the opportunities and challenges associated with scaling up RAS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An SLR was carried out based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. The PubMed, EBSCO, and Scopus databases were searched for reports from January 2018 through January 2024. Full-text reviews and research articles in the English language from Asia-Pacific countries were included. Articles that outlined training and costs associated with RAS were chosen.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common training system is the da Vinci system. The simulation technique, which includes dry-lab, wet-lab, and virtual reality training, was found to be a common and important practice. The cost of RAS encompasses the installation and maintenance costs of the robotic system, the operation theatre rent, personnel cost, surgical instrument and material cost, and other miscellaneous charges. The synthesis of SLR revealed the challenges and opportunities regarding RAS training and cost.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this SLR will help stakeholders such as decision-makers, influencers, and end users of RAS to understand the significance of training and cost in scaling up RAS from a managerial perspective. For any healthcare innovation to reach a vast population, cost-effectiveness and standard training are crucial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000306/pdfft?md5=ed19109b4ad16ebff3b6acd65fdd5a67&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000306-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141137107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.004
Objective
Laparoscopic surgery has become a routine general surgery with many advantages, such as alleviating abdominal pain. However, postoperative pain caused by abdominal drainage tubes has attracted little attention from medical staff. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of a new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on patients’ postoperative quality of life.
Methods
Patients who underwent 3-port LC with abdominal drainage tubes in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Linyi People’s Hospital from March 1, 2023 to October 31, 2023 due to gallstones with chronic cholecystitis were selected for this study. The patients were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. In the experimental group, the new abdominal drainage tube fixation method was used, while in the control group, the traditional method was used. Afterward, the quality of life of patient in terms of pain, activity, recovery time, and mental health status was evaluated. The exudate around the patient’s drainage tube was collected for bacterial culture and analysis.
Results
A total of 139 patients were randomly divided into an experimental group (70 patients) and a control group (69 patients). The patients’ baseline characteristics were not significantly different. The patients in the experimental group had better outcomes in quality of life, with higher pain scores (24.03 ± 2.37 vs. 15.48 ± 2.29, p < 0.001) and activity scores (20.57 ± 1.78 vs. 14.13 ± 1.43, p < 0.001), and a shorter postoperative recovery time (2.36 ± 0.68 d vs. 2.96 ± 1.34 d, p < 0.001). The same results were shown in linear regression analysis scores of the 2 groups. The positive rate of bacterial culture in the exudate around the patient’s drainage tube in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (12.9% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.001); and furthermore, the positive rate of conditional pathogenic bacteria was even lower (7.1% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) in the experimental group than in the control group.
Conclusion
This new abdominal drainage tube fixation method can effectively promote patient rehabilitation and improve the quality of life for patient following 3-port LC with abdominal drainage tubes.
目的腹腔镜手术已成为常规普外科手术,具有减轻腹痛等诸多优点。然而,腹腔引流管引起的术后疼痛却很少引起医务人员的重视。本研究旨在探讨三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)腹腔引流管固定新方法对患者术后生活质量的影响。方法选取 2023 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 31 日在临沂市人民医院肝胆外科因胆结石合并慢性胆囊炎行三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术并行腹腔引流管固定的患者为研究对象。将患者随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组采用新型腹腔引流管固定法,对照组采用传统方法。随后,从疼痛、活动、恢复时间和心理健康状况等方面对患者的生活质量进行评估。结果 139 名患者被随机分为实验组(70 名)和对照组(69 名)。两组患者的基线特征无明显差异。实验组患者的生活质量更好,疼痛评分(24.03 ± 2.37 vs. 15.48 ± 2.29,p < 0.001)和活动评分(20.57 ± 1.78 vs. 14.13 ± 1.43,p < 0.001)更高,术后恢复时间更短(2.36 ± 0.68 d vs. 2.96 ± 1.34 d,p < 0.001)。两组的线性回归分析评分显示了相同的结果。实验组患者引流管周围渗出液的细菌培养阳性率明显低于对照组(12.9% vs. 43.5%,p < 0.001);此外,条件致病菌的阳性率更低(7.结论这种新的腹腔引流管固定方法能有效促进患者康复,提高腹腔引流管三腔LC术后患者的生活质量。
{"title":"A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Laparoscopic surgery has become a routine general surgery with many advantages, such as alleviating abdominal pain. However, postoperative pain caused by abdominal drainage tubes has attracted little attention from medical staff. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of a new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on patients’ postoperative quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who underwent 3-port LC with abdominal drainage tubes in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Linyi People’s Hospital from March 1, 2023 to October 31, 2023 due to gallstones with chronic cholecystitis were selected for this study. The patients were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. In the experimental group, the new abdominal drainage tube fixation method was used, while in the control group, the traditional method was used. Afterward, the quality of life of patient in terms of pain, activity, recovery time, and mental health status was evaluated. The exudate around the patient’s drainage tube was collected for bacterial culture and analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 139 patients were randomly divided into an experimental group (70 patients) and a control group (69 patients). The patients’ baseline characteristics were not significantly different. The patients in the experimental group had better outcomes in quality of life, with higher pain scores (24.03 ± 2.37 vs. 15.48 ± 2.29, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and activity scores (20.57 ± 1.78 vs. 14.13 ± 1.43, <em>p</em> < 0.001), and a shorter postoperative recovery time (2.36 ± 0.68 d vs. 2.96 ± 1.34 d, <em>p</em> < 0.001). The same results were shown in linear regression analysis scores of the 2 groups. The positive rate of bacterial culture in the exudate around the patient’s drainage tube in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (12.9% vs. 43.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.001); and furthermore, the positive rate of conditional pathogenic bacteria was even lower (7.1% vs. 33.3%, <em>p</em> < 0.001) in the experimental group than in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This new abdominal drainage tube fixation method can effectively promote patient rehabilitation and improve the quality of life for patient following 3-port LC with abdominal drainage tubes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000264/pdfft?md5=21128b25e039a87bee4d573c4a758f36&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000264-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140782630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.003
{"title":"Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000227/pdfft?md5=88441fdc21caa825c1d87d089feedd36&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000227-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140272100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.001
Objective
Traditionally tumors of the parapharyngeal space (PPS) are resected through transcervical approaches. More recent approaches include endoscopic approaches or transoral robotic surgery (TORS) without directions on when to use which approach. Our objective was to find objective parameters to choose the most suitable approach.
Methods
It is a retrospective study containing 6 patients from May 2019 to May 2021 with tumors of the PPS treated in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery at the Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland.
Results
The data was analysed in average 53 months after surgery. Tumor resection was completed with TORS in 3 patients and endoscopically in 3 patients. Mean operation time was 114 min. No major complications occurred. No evidence of tumor was found in magnetic resonance imaging studies postoperatively in all patients.
Conclusion
We conclude that a resection via TORS or endoscopic technique is safe and effective. Furthermore, we postulate that the further a tumor is located in the upper lateral area of the PPS, an approach via TORS is less possible.
{"title":"Minimally invasive management of parapharyngeal space tumors: Introducing a decision-making algorithm and radiologic tool","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Traditionally tumors of the parapharyngeal space (PPS) are resected through transcervical approaches. More recent approaches include endoscopic approaches or transoral robotic surgery (TORS) without directions on when to use which approach. Our objective was to find objective parameters to choose the most suitable approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It is a retrospective study containing 6 patients from May 2019 to May 2021 with tumors of the PPS treated in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery at the Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data was analysed in average 53 months after surgery. Tumor resection was completed with TORS in 3 patients and endoscopically in 3 patients. Mean operation time was 114 min. No major complications occurred. No evidence of tumor was found in magnetic resonance imaging studies postoperatively in all patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that a resection via TORS or endoscopic technique is safe and effective. Furthermore, we postulate that the further a tumor is located in the upper lateral area of the PPS, an approach via TORS is less possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000434/pdfft?md5=734927f574d1874fc4e1fcef6b962bbf&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000434-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141403444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.07.001
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic training using origami, a traditional Japanese papercraft, using laparoscopic forceps to create origami cranes.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 4 surgeons were randomly divided into 2 groups: The training group, consisting of surgeons 1 and 2, and the non-training group, consisting of surgeons 3 and 4. Over the course of a one-year study period, the training group regularly underwent laparoscopic surgery training with a dry box, wherein they folded a total of 1000 origami cranes using laparoscopic instruments. The non-training group periodically underwent common laparoscopic surgery training of techniques such as suturing and ligation. Each surgeon regularly performed the transabdominal preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernias. Each training was conducted concurrently with the surgeries. The procedure time (peritoneum detachment, mesh placement, and closure of the peritoneum), total operation time (time from peritoneum detachment to closure of the peritoneum), and surgical outcomes were examined.
Results
The training group showed greater improvement in the total operation time and more stable performance than the non-training group. Additionally, the time taken for peritoneum detachment was significantly shorter in the training group.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic training using origami has the potential to enhance laparoscopic surgical skills and improve surgical outcomes.
{"title":"Enhancing clinical proficiency through laparoscopic training using Japanese origami","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic training using origami, a traditional Japanese papercraft, using laparoscopic forceps to create origami cranes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, 4 surgeons were randomly divided into 2 groups: The training group, consisting of surgeons 1 and 2, and the non-training group, consisting of surgeons 3 and 4. Over the course of a one-year study period, the training group regularly underwent laparoscopic surgery training with a dry box, wherein they folded a total of 1000 origami cranes using laparoscopic instruments. The non-training group periodically underwent common laparoscopic surgery training of techniques such as suturing and ligation. Each surgeon regularly performed the transabdominal preperitoneal approach for inguinal hernias. Each training was conducted concurrently with the surgeries. The procedure time (peritoneum detachment, mesh placement, and closure of the peritoneum), total operation time (time from peritoneum detachment to closure of the peritoneum), and surgical outcomes were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The training group showed greater improvement in the total operation time and more stable performance than the non-training group. Additionally, the time taken for peritoneum detachment was significantly shorter in the training group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Laparoscopic training using origami has the potential to enhance laparoscopic surgical skills and improve surgical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000471/pdfft?md5=60b2f17aa70d7a2162efe773f11d968d&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000471-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141705534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.001
{"title":"Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000203/pdfft?md5=965932ce5dccedf29b2388862fe3624a&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000203-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142164511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.002
{"title":"A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000240/pdfft?md5=fa678e6630ad190a6bc58261ec4ce7dd&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000240-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140782020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.001
Lina Zhao, Wenya Li, Lei Zhang
Objective
Endoscopic tympanoplasty includes various surgical methods, such as internal repair, interlayer repair, and external overlay. This technique requires autologous materials, allografts, and xenografts, which are used to repair tympanic membrane (TM) perforation. To obtain good results, appropriate surgical methods and repair materials should be selected. This study aims to assess the efficacy of repairing refractory TM perforations in the porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) during transcanal endoscopic type I tympanoplasty.
Method
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent TM perforation repair with porcine SIS and tragus cartilage between January 2022 and September 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Perforation size, tympanic status, pre- and postoperative symptoms, follow-up data, wound healing rates, and hearing improvement were analysed.
Results
Of the 115 patients included in the study, 56 underwent interlayer repair with porcine SIS of the TM, and 59 patients underwent internal repair with tragus cartilage. No significant difference was found between the two groups at baseline in terms of age, sex, disease course, perforation side, tympanic status, underlying disease, or preoperative infection. The total postoperative effective rate of interlayer implantation with porcine SIS was 91.07% (51 patients), and that of internal implantation with tragus cartilage was 88.14% (52 patients). No significant difference was found in terms of the graft success rate between the two surgical methods (p = 0.887). Postoperative pure tone auditory (PTA) and air-bone gap (ABG) density significantly increased in both groups compared with before surgery (p < 0.05). However, the postoperative PTA and ABG density were not significantly different 3 months post-surgery between the two groups (p > 0.05). Compared to those in the internal implantation group, the patients in the interlayer group had a shorter operation duration (51.36 ± 6.76 min vs. 59.71 ± 7.45 min, t = 6.298, p < 0.001) and less blood loss (11.91 ± 2.61 mL vs. 15.27 ± 2.57 mL, t = 7.019, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Our study suggests that the porcine SIS, as well as the tragus cartilage, has a high success rate in repairing irreversible TM perforation. Endoscopic tympanoplasty via interlayer implantation with porcine SIS offers distinct advantages, including the absence of donor-site incision and scar formation, and ease of graft modification and manipulation.
{"title":"Interlayer repair with porcine small intestinal submucosa versus internal repair with tragus cartilage in endoscopic tympanoplasty","authors":"Lina Zhao, Wenya Li, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Endoscopic tympanoplasty includes various surgical methods, such as internal repair, interlayer repair, and external overlay. This technique requires autologous materials, allografts, and xenografts, which are used to repair tympanic membrane (TM) perforation. To obtain good results, appropriate surgical methods and repair materials should be selected. This study aims to assess the efficacy of repairing refractory TM perforations in the porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) during transcanal endoscopic type I tympanoplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent TM perforation repair with porcine SIS and tragus cartilage between January 2022 and September 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Perforation size, tympanic status, pre- and postoperative symptoms, follow-up data, wound healing rates, and hearing improvement were analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 115 patients included in the study, 56 underwent interlayer repair with porcine SIS of the TM, and 59 patients underwent internal repair with tragus cartilage. No significant difference was found between the two groups at baseline in terms of age, sex, disease course, perforation side, tympanic status, underlying disease, or preoperative infection. The total postoperative effective rate of interlayer implantation with porcine SIS was 91.07% (51 patients), and that of internal implantation with tragus cartilage was 88.14% (52 patients). No significant difference was found in terms of the graft success rate between the two surgical methods (<em>p =</em> 0.887). Postoperative pure tone auditory (PTA) and air-bone gap (ABG) density significantly increased in both groups compared with before surgery (<em>p</em> < 0.05). However, the postoperative PTA and ABG density were not significantly different 3 months post-surgery between the two groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Compared to those in the internal implantation group, the patients in the interlayer group had a shorter operation duration (51.36 ± 6.76 min vs. 59.71 ± 7.45 min, t = 6.298, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and less blood loss (11.91 ± 2.61 mL vs. 15.27 ± 2.57 mL, t = 7.019, <em>p</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggests that the porcine SIS, as well as the tragus cartilage, has a high success rate in repairing irreversible TM perforation. Endoscopic tympanoplasty via interlayer implantation with porcine SIS offers distinct advantages, including the absence of donor-site incision and scar formation, and ease of graft modification and manipulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246890092400029X/pdfft?md5=2a7eac7e9f74b3c2505076ef03f8744d&pid=1-s2.0-S246890092400029X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141032919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.001
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi , Sentilnathan Subramaniam , Rauand Duhoky , Werner Hohenberger , Jim S. Khan
Colon cancer has the fifth highest incidence worldwide and has the sixth highest mortality. Compared with rectal cancer, colon cancer currently has the worst 5-year overall survival for patients with stage II and III disease. Complete mesocolic excision has been developed as a standardized and optimized surgical technique for the excision of colon cancers. This technique has traditionally been performed through an open approach since laparoscopy is generally considered technically challenging. The robotic approach has been slowly implemented for colon cancer, but the newest robotic platforms allow for a safer and optimized approach for right colon cancer. Several robotic approaches have been developed and explored. The expansion of the current robotic platform ecosystem is gradually providing new outputs in the application of the robotic approach to complete mesocolic excision. This review gains an oversight of existing literature on robotic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer (learning curve, training, techniques, approach, platforms, and future perspectives).
结肠癌在全球发病率排名第五,死亡率排名第六。与直肠癌相比,目前结肠癌 II 期和 III 期患者的 5 年总生存率最差。结肠系膜完全切除术是结肠癌切除术中标准化和最优化的手术技术。由于腹腔镜手术通常被认为在技术上具有挑战性,因此这项技术传统上都是通过开放式方法进行的。机器人方法在结肠癌手术中的应用较为缓慢,但最新的机器人平台可为右侧结肠癌手术提供更安全、更优化的方法。目前已开发并探索出多种机器人方法。当前机器人平台生态系统的扩展逐渐为应用机器人方法进行完整结肠系膜切除术提供了新的产出。本综述对现有的右结肠癌机器人全结肠系膜切除术文献(学习曲线、培训、技术、方法、平台和未来展望)进行了梳理。
{"title":"Robotic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Learning curve, training, techniques, approach, platforms, and future perspectives","authors":"Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi , Sentilnathan Subramaniam , Rauand Duhoky , Werner Hohenberger , Jim S. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Colon cancer has the fifth highest incidence worldwide and has the sixth highest mortality. Compared with rectal cancer, colon cancer currently has the worst 5-year overall survival for patients with stage II and III disease. Complete mesocolic excision has been developed as a standardized and optimized surgical technique for the excision of colon cancers. This technique has traditionally been performed through an open approach since laparoscopy is generally considered technically challenging. The robotic approach has been slowly implemented for colon cancer, but the newest robotic platforms allow for a safer and optimized approach for right colon cancer. Several robotic approaches have been developed and explored. The expansion of the current robotic platform ecosystem is gradually providing new outputs in the application of the robotic approach to complete mesocolic excision. This review gains an oversight of existing literature on robotic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer (learning curve, training, techniques, approach, platforms, and future perspectives).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000239/pdfft?md5=3e626acb3eb17337b6574c5f20e30ea2&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000239-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140767895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}