Encouraging student engagement, interaction, and learning via online discussion boards: Reflections on using Yellowdig in the COVID-19 era

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2023.2263614
Eva A. Alfoldi
{"title":"Encouraging student engagement, interaction, and learning via online discussion boards: Reflections on using Yellowdig in the COVID-19 era","authors":"Eva A. Alfoldi","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2023.2263614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn the COVID-19 era, Yellowdig (an online discussion board with social media-like features) has increasingly risen to prominence in higher education. Reflecting on a multi-year experiment involving 14 international business and marketing courses, I argue that Yellowdig remains a valuable tool for learning even after returning to face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, my experience also highlights its limitations. While Yellowdig is not a panacea for social learning, it can provide a versatile platform for student interaction and engagement, provided that instructors maintain a clear purpose and realistic expectations. I present key considerations to help instructors optimize their use of Yellowdig.Keywords: Discussion boardslearningsocial interactionstudent engagementYellowdig AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Gary Barnes and Daniel Sullivan for their insights, suggestions, and professional opinions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recently, Shea and Bidjerano (Citation2010) proposed the addition of a fourth construct to the model: learner presence, referring to self-efficacy and individual effort. For a more detailed literature review of the community of inquiry model, see Rourke and Kanuka (Citation2009).2 The company recommends a conversation ratio (total number of comments divided by total number of posts) of 8 or more. While the pedagogical value of focusing heavily on encouraging comments/reactions rather than original content is up for debate, Yellowdig’s developers contend that “the intended purpose of the gamification point system in Yellowdig is to alter behavior, not assess it, and to get students interacting with their peers” (Savvides et al., Citation2019).3 Three outliers from Fall 2020 were excluded from the calculation: 542.3 and 154.6% (minimum word counts were accidentally left on Yellowdig’s default settings) and −37.8% (due to teething problems, several students were granted a make-up assignment late in the course, which allowed them to post short comments).","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2263614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn the COVID-19 era, Yellowdig (an online discussion board with social media-like features) has increasingly risen to prominence in higher education. Reflecting on a multi-year experiment involving 14 international business and marketing courses, I argue that Yellowdig remains a valuable tool for learning even after returning to face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, my experience also highlights its limitations. While Yellowdig is not a panacea for social learning, it can provide a versatile platform for student interaction and engagement, provided that instructors maintain a clear purpose and realistic expectations. I present key considerations to help instructors optimize their use of Yellowdig.Keywords: Discussion boardslearningsocial interactionstudent engagementYellowdig AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Gary Barnes and Daniel Sullivan for their insights, suggestions, and professional opinions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recently, Shea and Bidjerano (Citation2010) proposed the addition of a fourth construct to the model: learner presence, referring to self-efficacy and individual effort. For a more detailed literature review of the community of inquiry model, see Rourke and Kanuka (Citation2009).2 The company recommends a conversation ratio (total number of comments divided by total number of posts) of 8 or more. While the pedagogical value of focusing heavily on encouraging comments/reactions rather than original content is up for debate, Yellowdig’s developers contend that “the intended purpose of the gamification point system in Yellowdig is to alter behavior, not assess it, and to get students interacting with their peers” (Savvides et al., Citation2019).3 Three outliers from Fall 2020 were excluded from the calculation: 542.3 and 154.6% (minimum word counts were accidentally left on Yellowdig’s default settings) and −37.8% (due to teething problems, several students were granted a make-up assignment late in the course, which allowed them to post short comments).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励学生通过在线讨论板参与、互动和学习:关于在COVID-19时代使用Yellowdig的思考
在新冠肺炎疫情时代,Yellowdig(一个具有社交媒体功能的在线讨论平台)在高等教育中日益崭露头角。回顾一项涉及14门国际商业和营销课程的多年实验,我认为,即使在回到面对面的课程后,Yellowdig仍然是一个有价值的学习工具。然而,我的经历也凸显了它的局限性。虽然Yellowdig不是社交学习的灵丹妙药,但它可以为学生互动和参与提供一个多功能平台,前提是教师保持明确的目标和现实的期望。我提出了一些关键的考虑因素,以帮助教师优化他们对Yellowdig的使用。关键词:讨论板;学习;社会互动;学生参与;致谢作者感谢Gary Barnes和Daniel Sullivan的见解、建议和专业意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1最近,Shea和Bidjerano (Citation2010)提出在模型中增加第四个构念:学习者在场,指的是自我效能感和个人努力。关于探究共同体模型的更详细的文献综述,请参见Rourke和Kanuka (Citation2009)该公司建议的对话比率(评论总数除以帖子总数)为8或更多。虽然侧重于鼓励评论/反应而不是原创内容的教学价值存在争议,但Yellowdig的开发者认为,“Yellowdig游戏化积分系统的预期目的是改变行为,而不是评估行为,并让学生与同龄人互动”(Savvides等人,Citation2019)2020年秋季的三个异常值被排除在计算之外:542.3和154.6%(最低字数不小心落在了Yellowdig的默认设置上)和- 37.8%(由于刚开始学习的问题,几名学生在课程后期被安排了补考作业,这使得他们可以发表简短的评论)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Business
Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of student evaluations: Exploring the effects of course modality and type in graduate business courses Embedded SDGs in undergraduate business sustainability programs curricula We have talent: Mock group interviewing improves employer perceived competence on hireability Unveiling student intention towards entrepreneurship development—a bibliometric investigation Measuring the impact of faculty development programmes on business schools’ performance in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1