Disability, trauma, and the place of affect in identity: Examining performativity in visual impairment rehabilitation

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Feminism & Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1177/09593535231200728
Brian Watermeyer, Michelle Botha
{"title":"Disability, trauma, and the place of affect in identity: Examining performativity in visual impairment rehabilitation","authors":"Brian Watermeyer, Michelle Botha","doi":"10.1177/09593535231200728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines rehabilitation services for visually impaired individuals as, in part, an amplified instantiation of disciplinary social forces maintaining heteronormative, ableist, and neoliberal norms. We problematise traditional rehabilitation's predominantly material focus, which elides experiences that are internal, emotional, relational, and reflective of issues of identity and social belonging, while creating links between gendered and ableist performativity. To do this, we draw on two qualitative data sources: firstly, interview data from a study of rehabilitation service organisations in South Africa, and secondly, a vignette provided by the second author, which describes a graduation ceremony (a performative ritual at a rehabilitation organisation). By means of a critical feminist disability studies lens, we consider the transmission of meanings and performative imperatives in these services, which tend to disallow the expression and processing of socially engendered trauma, thereby limiting the ability of visually impaired individuals to explore secure and authentic self-identities. Through the prism of visual impairment rehabilitation, commonalities between forces of dehumanisation resonant in the lives of both women and people with disabilities are brought to light, with implications for secure identities based on diversity, as well as for the creation of caring societies that embrace the reality of interdependence.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminism & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535231200728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines rehabilitation services for visually impaired individuals as, in part, an amplified instantiation of disciplinary social forces maintaining heteronormative, ableist, and neoliberal norms. We problematise traditional rehabilitation's predominantly material focus, which elides experiences that are internal, emotional, relational, and reflective of issues of identity and social belonging, while creating links between gendered and ableist performativity. To do this, we draw on two qualitative data sources: firstly, interview data from a study of rehabilitation service organisations in South Africa, and secondly, a vignette provided by the second author, which describes a graduation ceremony (a performative ritual at a rehabilitation organisation). By means of a critical feminist disability studies lens, we consider the transmission of meanings and performative imperatives in these services, which tend to disallow the expression and processing of socially engendered trauma, thereby limiting the ability of visually impaired individuals to explore secure and authentic self-identities. Through the prism of visual impairment rehabilitation, commonalities between forces of dehumanisation resonant in the lives of both women and people with disabilities are brought to light, with implications for secure identities based on diversity, as well as for the creation of caring societies that embrace the reality of interdependence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾、创伤和情感在身份中的地位:视障康复中的表演性检验
本文考察了视障人士的康复服务,在某种程度上,这是维持异性恋规范、残疾主义和新自由主义规范的纪律社会力量的放大实例。我们提出了传统康复主要关注物质的问题,它忽略了内在的、情感的、关系的体验,以及对身份和社会归属问题的反映,同时在性别和残疾主义表演之间建立了联系。为了做到这一点,我们借鉴了两个定性数据源:首先,来自南非康复服务组织研究的访谈数据,其次,第二作者提供的小插图,描述了毕业典礼(康复组织的表演仪式)。通过批判性女权主义残疾研究的视角,我们考虑了这些服务中的意义传递和行为要求,这些服务往往不允许表达和处理社会造成的创伤,从而限制了视障人士探索安全和真实自我身份的能力。通过视力障碍康复的棱镜,揭示了在妇女和残疾人生活中产生共鸣的非人性化力量之间的共性,这对基于多样性的安全身份以及创建拥抱相互依存现实的关怀社会具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Feminism & Psychology provides a forum for debate at the interface between feminism and psychology. The journal"s principal aim is to foster the development of feminist theory and practice in – and beyond – psychology. It publishes high-quality original research, theoretical articles, and commentaries. We are interested in pieces that provide insights into the gendered reality of everyday lives, especially in relation to women and girls, as well as pieces that address broader theoretical issues. Feminism & Psychology seeks to publish work from scholars, researchers, activists and practitioners at all stages of their careers who share a feminist analysis of the overlapping domains of gender and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Thanks to guest editors, manuscript reviewers, and student presentation reviewers Social work with young women in security emergencies: An autoethnography of epistemic resistance Porridge and misogyny: Rationalising inconspicuous misogyny in morning television shows Disability, trauma, and the place of affect in identity: Examining performativity in visual impairment rehabilitation Book Review: Lady sapiens: Breaking stereotypes about prehistoric women by Thomas Cirotteau, Jennifer Kerner, and Éric Pincas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1