Competence-based assessment and training for ethical situations in practice: a pilot study

IF 1.8 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Ethics & Behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/10508422.2023.2263896
Benjamin M. Ogles, Kristin Lang Hansen, David M. Erekson
{"title":"Competence-based assessment and training for ethical situations in practice: a pilot study","authors":"Benjamin M. Ogles, Kristin Lang Hansen, David M. Erekson","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2023.2263896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this pilot study, deliberate practice and competence-based assessment were incorporated into a first-year graduate course on professional issues and ethics. Students responded to challenging simulations of basic ethical situations in therapy before and after the course. Aspects of deliberate practice were incorporated into the course. Student self-report ratings and independent performance ratings blind to timing found improvements in students’ ability to manage basic ethical situations in practice. Pilot evidence suggests competence-based assessment and training have potential use for training students preparing to engage in their first therapy practicum experiences. Additional controlled studies are needed to examine the benefits of competence-based assessment and training.KEYWORDS: Competence-based trainingethicsfacilitative interpersonal skillsdeliberate practice AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Dr. Joseph Olsen for his helpful statistical consultation on this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementCorrespondence and requests for data sharing should be addressed to Ben Ogles, 268 TLRB, Comprehensive Clinic, Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84,602. Email: ben_ogles@byu.edu Phone: (801) 422–8193Additional informationFundingPartial funding for this project was provided by the Sorensen Center for Moral and Ethical Leadership at Brigham Young University.","PeriodicalId":47265,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2023.2263896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn this pilot study, deliberate practice and competence-based assessment were incorporated into a first-year graduate course on professional issues and ethics. Students responded to challenging simulations of basic ethical situations in therapy before and after the course. Aspects of deliberate practice were incorporated into the course. Student self-report ratings and independent performance ratings blind to timing found improvements in students’ ability to manage basic ethical situations in practice. Pilot evidence suggests competence-based assessment and training have potential use for training students preparing to engage in their first therapy practicum experiences. Additional controlled studies are needed to examine the benefits of competence-based assessment and training.KEYWORDS: Competence-based trainingethicsfacilitative interpersonal skillsdeliberate practice AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Dr. Joseph Olsen for his helpful statistical consultation on this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementCorrespondence and requests for data sharing should be addressed to Ben Ogles, 268 TLRB, Comprehensive Clinic, Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84,602. Email: ben_ogles@byu.edu Phone: (801) 422–8193Additional informationFundingPartial funding for this project was provided by the Sorensen Center for Moral and Ethical Leadership at Brigham Young University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践中基于能力的道德状况评估和培训:一项试点研究
在这项试点研究中,将刻意练习和基于能力的评估纳入一年级研究生的职业问题和道德课程。学生们对课程前后治疗中基本伦理情境的挑战性模拟做出了反应。刻意练习的各个方面被纳入课程。学生自我报告评分和不考虑时间的独立表现评分发现,学生在实践中处理基本道德状况的能力有所提高。试点证据表明,基于能力的评估和培训对于培训准备从事第一次治疗实习经验的学生具有潜在的用途。需要更多的对照研究来审查基于能力的评估和培训的好处。关键词:能力训练伦理促进人际交往技巧刻意练习作者感谢Joseph Olsen博士为本文提供的有益的统计咨询。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明数据共享的通信和请求应发送给Ben Ogles, 268 TLRB,综合诊所,杨百翰大学心理学系,Provo, UT 84,602。电子邮件:ben_ogles@byu.edu电话:(801)422 - 8193本项目的部分资金由杨百翰大学索伦森道德与伦理领导中心提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & Behavior
Ethics & Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Publication pressure and questionable research practices: a moderated mediation model Exploring educators’ epistemological worldviews and their influence on pedagogical decision-making in scientific ethics education at Malaysian universities Cultural perspectives on academic dishonesty: exploring racial and ethnic diversity in higher education The impact of perception of school moral atmosphere on college students’ moral sensitivity Educator experiences with postgraduate psychology students exhibiting professional competence issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1