From A to Z: Effects of a 2nd-grade reading intervention program for struggling readers

João Lopes , Pedro S. Martins , Célia Oliveira , João Ferreira , João Tiago Oliveira , Nuno Crato
{"title":"From A to Z: Effects of a 2nd-grade reading intervention program for struggling readers","authors":"João Lopes ,&nbsp;Pedro S. Martins ,&nbsp;Célia Oliveira ,&nbsp;João Ferreira ,&nbsp;João Tiago Oliveira ,&nbsp;Nuno Crato","doi":"10.1016/j.psicoe.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Many children in primary grades show difficulties with reading fluency, hardly reading text or doing it effortfully and fruitlessly, making intervention programs for struggling readers a priority for researchers and schools. This paper analyzes the results of a reading intervention program for 182 second-grade struggling readers (boys</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->aged 7-8 46.7%) from public schools. Students received a multi-component program, including repeated readings, word recognition, morphological analysis, text interpretation, and writing skills. Participants received about fifty 45-minute intervention sessions over the school year. Using a difference-in-differences, quasi-experimental between- (intervention and control group) and within-group longitudinal design (three-point measurements), we found that the intervention group progressed significantly faster than a classmate control group (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->827, boys<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->aged 7-8, 52.4%) in all reading outcomes (speed, accuracy, and expressiveness). By the end of the school year, differences between the intervention and control groups in accuracy and expressiveness become small but are still large in reading speed. Implications for research and practice are presented at the end of the paper.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101103,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages 57-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253038052300014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many children in primary grades show difficulties with reading fluency, hardly reading text or doing it effortfully and fruitlessly, making intervention programs for struggling readers a priority for researchers and schools. This paper analyzes the results of a reading intervention program for 182 second-grade struggling readers (boys = aged 7-8 46.7%) from public schools. Students received a multi-component program, including repeated readings, word recognition, morphological analysis, text interpretation, and writing skills. Participants received about fifty 45-minute intervention sessions over the school year. Using a difference-in-differences, quasi-experimental between- (intervention and control group) and within-group longitudinal design (three-point measurements), we found that the intervention group progressed significantly faster than a classmate control group (n = 827, boys = aged 7-8, 52.4%) in all reading outcomes (speed, accuracy, and expressiveness). By the end of the school year, differences between the intervention and control groups in accuracy and expressiveness become small but are still large in reading speed. Implications for research and practice are presented at the end of the paper.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 A 到 Z:针对有困难的读者的二年级阅读干预计划的效果
许多小学阶段的儿童在阅读流畅性方面存在困难,他们几乎不阅读课文,或者是费力不讨好地阅读课文,这使得针对阅读困难儿童的干预计划成为研究人员和学校的当务之急。本文分析了针对公立学校 182 名二年级学困生(男生=7-8 岁,占 46.7%)的阅读干预计划的结果。学生们接受了一个由多个部分组成的项目,包括反复阅读、单词识别、形态分析、文本解读和写作技巧。参与者在一学年中接受了约 50 次 45 分钟的干预课程。通过采用差异化、准实验性的组间(干预组和对照组)和组内纵向设计(三点测量),我们发现干预组在所有阅读成果(速度、准确性和表达能力)方面的进步明显快于同学对照组(n = 827,男生 = 7-8 岁,52.4%)。到学年结束时,干预组和对照组在准确性和表现力方面的差距变小,但在阅读速度方面的差距仍然很大。本文最后介绍了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of a gamified-based intermittent teaching unit in Physical Education on schoolchildrenʼs accelerometer-measured weekly physical activity: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. School-fit study The mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between hope and academic satisfaction among Ecuadorian university students Effects of an integrative school-based intervention on child protection against violence: A quasi-experimental study How smartphone addiction disrupts the positive relationship between self-regulation, self-efficacy and student engagement in distance education The predictive influence of family, teachers, and peers on affective, cognitive, and behavioral school engagement in primary and secondary school students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1