Perceptions And Challenges Of Nursing Students Related To Online Learning During COVID-19 in Guyana.-A mixed method study

Rani Paul, Lois Stephanas
{"title":"Perceptions And Challenges Of Nursing Students Related To Online Learning During COVID-19 in Guyana.-A mixed method study","authors":"Rani Paul, Lois Stephanas","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.ie25.pcns","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the nursing students’ perceptions and experiences of online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic- a mixed method.&#x0D; Methods: A mixed method was used and obtained ethical approval from IRB. Quantitatively 419 nursing students’ perceptions were assessed using a valid and reliable Likert scale with 37 items through google form survey. Qualitatively five focus group discussions (6 to 8 students each) with duration of 60 to 90 minutes from respective five Schools of nursing were conducted via zoom and recorded. Codes were generated using MAXQDA analytics Pro 2022 version 22.2.1. &#x0D; Results: 276 (65.87%) students agreed self-discipline is necessary for online learning. 267 (63.72%) students strongly agree that online classes reduce travel expenses. Gender had no influence on perception. Younger students showed more positive perception than older students, Senior BSN students showed positive perception compared to RN students and associations are statistically significant at <0.001.&#x0D; Thematic analysis led to the following themes. Some preferred online learning due to its “flexibility” “Convenient” and “access to recorded sessions” and others preferred face to face: online learning is “good for theory only”, but for practical sessions face to face interactions is necessary, “Sense of isolation” “No student interaction” “less student- faculty interaction”. Barriers identified were “internet connectivity issues”, “Electricity issues” and “Technological issues”. Facilitators were “convenience” “reduced cost in transportation” “saves time” and opportunity to become “tech savvy”.&#x0D; Conclusion: Online classes are suitable for theoretical aspects but require face to face interaction for practical components.&#x0D; Key words: perceptions, online learning, nursing students.","PeriodicalId":31363,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.ie25.pcns","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the nursing students’ perceptions and experiences of online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic- a mixed method. Methods: A mixed method was used and obtained ethical approval from IRB. Quantitatively 419 nursing students’ perceptions were assessed using a valid and reliable Likert scale with 37 items through google form survey. Qualitatively five focus group discussions (6 to 8 students each) with duration of 60 to 90 minutes from respective five Schools of nursing were conducted via zoom and recorded. Codes were generated using MAXQDA analytics Pro 2022 version 22.2.1. Results: 276 (65.87%) students agreed self-discipline is necessary for online learning. 267 (63.72%) students strongly agree that online classes reduce travel expenses. Gender had no influence on perception. Younger students showed more positive perception than older students, Senior BSN students showed positive perception compared to RN students and associations are statistically significant at <0.001. Thematic analysis led to the following themes. Some preferred online learning due to its “flexibility” “Convenient” and “access to recorded sessions” and others preferred face to face: online learning is “good for theory only”, but for practical sessions face to face interactions is necessary, “Sense of isolation” “No student interaction” “less student- faculty interaction”. Barriers identified were “internet connectivity issues”, “Electricity issues” and “Technological issues”. Facilitators were “convenience” “reduced cost in transportation” “saves time” and opportunity to become “tech savvy”. Conclusion: Online classes are suitable for theoretical aspects but require face to face interaction for practical components. Key words: perceptions, online learning, nursing students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19期间圭亚那护理专业学生对在线学习的看法和挑战-混合方法研究
目的:探讨新型冠状病毒病疫情期间护生在线学习的认知和体会——混合方法。 方法:采用混合方法,并获得IRB的伦理批准。采用有效可靠的李克特量表对419名护生的知觉进行定量评估,共37个条目。定性地对来自五个护理学院的5个焦点小组(每个小组6 - 8名学生)进行60 - 90分钟的讨论,并通过zoom进行记录。代码使用MAXQDA分析Pro 2022版本22.2.1生成。& # x0D;结果:276名(65.87%)学生认为自律是网络学习的必要条件。267名(63.72%)学生强烈同意在线课程可以减少差旅费用。性别对感知没有影响。年龄较小的学生比年龄较大的学生有更积极的感知,大四的BSN学生比RN学生有更积极的感知,两者之间的关联有统计学意义(<0.001)。 主题分析得出以下主题。一些人喜欢在线学习,因为它“灵活”、“方便”和“可以录制课程”,而另一些人喜欢面对面的学习:在线学习“只适用于理论”,但对于实践课程来说,面对面的互动是必要的,“孤立感”、“没有学生互动”、“师生互动少”。确定的障碍是“互联网连接问题”、“电力问题”和“技术问题”。促进因素是“方便”、“降低运输成本”、“节省时间”和成为“技术通”的机会。 结论:网络课程适合理论部分,但实际部分需要面对面的互动。 关键词:认知,在线学习,护生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entorno laboral de enfermería en un hospital de Bogotá, 2022 Experiencia del síntoma en el Síndrome Coronario Agudo: comprobación de un modelo conceptual Percepción de la simulación clínica como experiencia de aprendizaje en estudiantes de Licenciatura en Enfermería Ações de educação interprofissional desenvolvidas no contexto dos cursos de graduação em saúde Validación de la Escala de Valoración de Agencia de Autocuidado Revisada en una muestra colombiana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1