“LOOK WITH THINE EARS”: THE DEPRECATION OF OCULARCENTRIC CULTURE IN WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S KING LEAR

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Folia Linguistica et Litteraria Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.31902/fll.44.2023.12
Javad Khorsand, Bahee Hadaegh
{"title":"“LOOK WITH THINE EARS”: THE DEPRECATION OF OCULARCENTRIC CULTURE IN WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S KING LEAR","authors":"Javad Khorsand, Bahee Hadaegh","doi":"10.31902/fll.44.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his groundbreaking research on the broad phenomenon of Western visual culture in important intellectual eras, Martin Jay touches on the abundance of ocular references in Renaissance literature and cites the example of William Shakespeare whose works are replete with visual metaphors. Notwithstanding extensive research on the role of vision in Shakespeare’s works, it seems that scant attention has been paid to the Bard’s deprecation of ocularcentric culture. Shakespeare was, admittedly, not the first writer who depicted and challenged the biased privileging of sight in Western culture, but the present study focuses on the example of King Lear to show that Shakespearean drama played a significant role in reflecting the dire consequences of ocularcentrism in society. Drawing on first-hand Renaissance accounts of vision, Martin Jay’s exhaustive research into the history of ocularcentrism in the West, and James Shapiro’s historical account of the year Shakespeare’s King Lear was first performed, this study employs a New Historicist methodology to examine how Shakespearean drama marks both a turn away from the traditional hegemony of vision and a turning point in the criticism of modern ocularcentric culture in the West. We conclude that King Lear serves, among other things, to remind us that visual subjugation transcends the boundaries of time and culture and that we could all ourselves be Lears or Gloucesters, deluded by the proverbial concept that “seeing is believing”","PeriodicalId":40358,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.44.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his groundbreaking research on the broad phenomenon of Western visual culture in important intellectual eras, Martin Jay touches on the abundance of ocular references in Renaissance literature and cites the example of William Shakespeare whose works are replete with visual metaphors. Notwithstanding extensive research on the role of vision in Shakespeare’s works, it seems that scant attention has been paid to the Bard’s deprecation of ocularcentric culture. Shakespeare was, admittedly, not the first writer who depicted and challenged the biased privileging of sight in Western culture, but the present study focuses on the example of King Lear to show that Shakespearean drama played a significant role in reflecting the dire consequences of ocularcentrism in society. Drawing on first-hand Renaissance accounts of vision, Martin Jay’s exhaustive research into the history of ocularcentrism in the West, and James Shapiro’s historical account of the year Shakespeare’s King Lear was first performed, this study employs a New Historicist methodology to examine how Shakespearean drama marks both a turn away from the traditional hegemony of vision and a turning point in the criticism of modern ocularcentric culture in the West. We conclude that King Lear serves, among other things, to remind us that visual subjugation transcends the boundaries of time and culture and that we could all ourselves be Lears or Gloucesters, deluded by the proverbial concept that “seeing is believing”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“用你的耳朵看”:威廉·莎士比亚的《李尔王》中对以眼睛为中心的文化的贬低
马丁·杰伊对西方视觉文化在重要知识时代的广泛现象进行了开创性的研究,他提到了文艺复兴文学中大量的视觉参考,并引用了威廉·莎士比亚的例子,他的作品中充满了视觉隐喻。尽管对视觉在莎士比亚作品中的作用进行了广泛的研究,但似乎很少有人注意到吟游诗人对以视觉为中心的文化的贬低。诚然,莎士比亚并不是第一个描绘和挑战西方文化中对视力的偏见特权的作家,但本研究以《李尔王》为例,表明莎士比亚戏剧在反映视觉中心主义在社会中的可怕后果方面发挥了重要作用。借鉴文艺复兴时期对视觉的第一手描述,马丁·杰伊对西方视觉中心主义历史的详尽研究,以及詹姆斯·夏皮罗对莎士比亚《李尔王》首次演出年份的历史描述,本研究采用新历史主义方法论来研究莎士比亚戏剧如何标志着对传统视觉霸权的背离,以及对西方现代视觉中心主义文化批评的转折点。我们的结论是,《李尔王》在其他方面提醒我们,视觉的征服超越了时间和文化的界限,我们都可以成为李尔王或格洛斯特,被“眼见为实”的谚语所迷惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
HIGHER EDUCATION DISCOURSE: CHANGES IN THE USE OF VERBAL AND VISUAL DEVICES IN CROATIAN UNIVERSITY SELF-PRESENTATION SHADES OF A WOMAN’S TIME: THE CHRONOTOPIC REVISION OF HISTORY IN SELECTED POEMS OF EAVAN BOLAND’S OUTSIDE HISTORY NIETZSCHE’S AMOR FATI IN DAVID FOSTER WALLACE’S INFINITE JEST SOME LINGUISTIC AND STYLISTIC PROPERTIES OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE FROM THE TREASURES OF ANCIENT ITALIAN: CONJUNCTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1