Comparison of vanilla extract intervention group and control group on neonatal pain and comfort levels during venous blood sampling

Q4 Health Professions Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia Pub Date : 2023-07-30 DOI:10.22219/jk.v14i02.27349
Reni Ilmiasih
{"title":"Comparison of vanilla extract intervention group and control group on neonatal pain and comfort levels during venous blood sampling","authors":"Reni Ilmiasih","doi":"10.22219/jk.v14i02.27349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Taking venous blood in neonates is always uncomfortable and painful. Pain in taking venous blood is bad for neonates. Short-term effects that occur include increased pulse, and tissue damage around the venous blood collection area. Long-term impacts can be disrupted psychological aspects and the development of neonatal behavior. Untreated discomfort and pain can lead to complications, including hyperalgesia and changes in the experience of pain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of giving vanilla extract to the pain level and comfort level of neonates who had venous blood taken. Methods: The type of research is Quasy Experiment with Control Group post test only design. The sampling technique was purposive sampling for 3 months of data collection with a total of 40 respondents. Data analysis using the Independent T Test. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. Conclusions: These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses.","PeriodicalId":53389,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jk.v14i02.27349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Taking venous blood in neonates is always uncomfortable and painful. Pain in taking venous blood is bad for neonates. Short-term effects that occur include increased pulse, and tissue damage around the venous blood collection area. Long-term impacts can be disrupted psychological aspects and the development of neonatal behavior. Untreated discomfort and pain can lead to complications, including hyperalgesia and changes in the experience of pain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of giving vanilla extract to the pain level and comfort level of neonates who had venous blood taken. Methods: The type of research is Quasy Experiment with Control Group post test only design. The sampling technique was purposive sampling for 3 months of data collection with a total of 40 respondents. Data analysis using the Independent T Test. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the pain scales of the two groups (p=0.51), but the average pain scale was higher in the control group. There is a significant difference in the results of the front comfort score p value = 0.00. Conclusions: These results are in accordance with previous research that the vanilla concentration of 0.64% and 2% could not significantly reduce pain. It is possible that the results will be different in further studies with a larger number of respondents and different techniques and doses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香草提取物干预组与对照组新生儿静脉血采血时疼痛和舒适程度的比较
新生儿静脉血总是不舒服和痛苦的。抽静脉血时疼痛对新生儿不利。短期影响包括脉搏加快,静脉血采集区周围组织损伤。长期影响可破坏心理方面和新生儿行为的发展。未经治疗的不适和疼痛可导致并发症,包括痛觉过敏和疼痛体验的变化。目的:本研究的目的是分析给予香草提取物对静脉血新生儿疼痛水平和舒适度的影响。方法:研究类型为随机实验,对照组后验设计。抽样方法为有目的抽样,收集数据3个月,共40名受访者。数据分析采用独立T检验。结果:两组患者的疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.51),但对照组患者的平均疼痛评分高于对照组。前舒适性评分结果有显著性差异p值= 0.00。这些结果与之前的研究一致,0.64%和2%的香草浓度不能显著减轻疼痛。在更多应答者和不同技术和剂量的进一步研究中,结果可能会有所不同。结果显示,两组患者的疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.51),但对照组的平均疼痛评分高于对照组。前舒适性评分结果有显著性差异p值= 0.00。这些结果与之前的研究一致,0.64%和2%的香草浓度不能显著减轻疼痛。在更多应答者和不同技术和剂量的进一步研究中,结果可能会有所不同。结果显示,两组患者的疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.51),但对照组的平均疼痛评分高于对照组。前舒适性评分结果有显著性差异p值= 0.00。结论:本实验结果与前人研究一致,0.64%和2%香草浓度均不能显著减轻疼痛。在更多应答者和不同技术和剂量的进一步研究中,结果可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia
Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia Nursing-Research and Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hubungan Pengetahuan Orang Tua Dengan Upaya Pencegahan Penyakit DHF Pada Anak Di Puskesmas Janti Kota Malang HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DENGAN KEPATUHAN MINUM OBAT PADA PASIEN DIEBETES MELITUS TIPE II DI PUSKESMAS JANTI MALANG Overview of Depression Screening in Elderly with Non Communicable Diseases during COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas : Descriptive Studies in Pakis Malang Hubungan Perilaku Penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri (Apd) Dan Pelaksanaan Pencegahan Covid-19 Dengan Kecemasan Perawat Di Rumah Sakit X, Kalimantan Barat PENGARUH MEDIA FILM DOKUMENTER TERHADAP PENINGKATAN PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP SISWA DALAM PERTOLONGAN PERTAMA CEDERA MUSKULOSKELETAL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1