EDUCATIONAL DESIGN AND EVALUATION MODELS OF THE LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS IN E-LEARNING PROCESS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.17718/tojde.1177297
Adamantia SPATIOTI, Ioannis KAZANIDIS, Jenny PANGE
{"title":"EDUCATIONAL DESIGN AND EVALUATION MODELS OF THE LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS IN E-LEARNING PROCESS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Adamantia SPATIOTI, Ioannis KAZANIDIS, Jenny PANGE","doi":"10.17718/tojde.1177297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational Design and Evaluation Models are important factors in e-learning as they provide guidance information for proper strategy organization pursuing both specific learning outcomes and ensuring the main elements of e-learning, such as self-regulation and collaborative learning. The examined educational models of ADDIE, Bloom, and Kirkpatrick are widely known and recognized as models for design and measuring the effectiveness of learning in order to achieve the best possible learning outcomes based on the needs of a specific target group in a specific educational context whether traditional or digital. Specifically, the ADDIE Model is a widely known learning design model used by many educational designers and training programmers to develop education and training programs. The Bloom Taxonomy is a method of building learning goals that follows the process of cognition. The Kirkpatrick Model is a method of evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning and educational programs in general, both in terms of training and business performance of learners. The purpose of this paper was both the investigation of the academic performance, the self-regulated learning and the collaborative learning in relation to the models of ADDIE, Kirkpatrick and Bloom in distance online environments and their effectiveness to the learning process. Meta-analysis was applied for research methodology. After a systematic literature review, we found that only 37 articles were appropriate for meta-analysis. Especially, 23 articles were on the ADDIE model, 9 articles were on the Kirkpatrick model and 5 articles were on the Bloom model. According to the results of this study, we found that all models apply to online process and meet different learning requirements. Regarding the cognitive performance of the trainees, all models supported the effectiveness of distance education. Moreover, the self-regulated learning and the collaborative learning, as factors inextricably linked to the effectiveness of the distance education, were examined in a small number studies in the above models. Finally, all three examined models reinforced students’ positive attitudes and perceptions, even while transferring the acquired knowledge to the workplace.","PeriodicalId":46002,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1177297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational Design and Evaluation Models are important factors in e-learning as they provide guidance information for proper strategy organization pursuing both specific learning outcomes and ensuring the main elements of e-learning, such as self-regulation and collaborative learning. The examined educational models of ADDIE, Bloom, and Kirkpatrick are widely known and recognized as models for design and measuring the effectiveness of learning in order to achieve the best possible learning outcomes based on the needs of a specific target group in a specific educational context whether traditional or digital. Specifically, the ADDIE Model is a widely known learning design model used by many educational designers and training programmers to develop education and training programs. The Bloom Taxonomy is a method of building learning goals that follows the process of cognition. The Kirkpatrick Model is a method of evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning and educational programs in general, both in terms of training and business performance of learners. The purpose of this paper was both the investigation of the academic performance, the self-regulated learning and the collaborative learning in relation to the models of ADDIE, Kirkpatrick and Bloom in distance online environments and their effectiveness to the learning process. Meta-analysis was applied for research methodology. After a systematic literature review, we found that only 37 articles were appropriate for meta-analysis. Especially, 23 articles were on the ADDIE model, 9 articles were on the Kirkpatrick model and 5 articles were on the Bloom model. According to the results of this study, we found that all models apply to online process and meet different learning requirements. Regarding the cognitive performance of the trainees, all models supported the effectiveness of distance education. Moreover, the self-regulated learning and the collaborative learning, as factors inextricably linked to the effectiveness of the distance education, were examined in a small number studies in the above models. Finally, all three examined models reinforced students’ positive attitudes and perceptions, even while transferring the acquired knowledge to the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
e-learning过程中教育设计与学习效果评价模型的系统回顾
教育设计和评估模型是电子学习的重要因素,因为它们为追求特定学习成果和确保电子学习的主要要素(如自我调节和协作学习)的适当战略组织提供了指导信息。ADDIE、Bloom和Kirkpatrick所研究的教育模型被广泛认为是设计和衡量学习有效性的模型,目的是根据特定教育背景下(无论是传统的还是数字的)特定目标群体的需求实现最佳的学习结果。具体来说,ADDIE模型是一种广为人知的学习设计模型,被许多教育设计师和培训程序员用来制定教育和培训计划。布鲁姆分类法是一种遵循认知过程建立学习目标的方法。柯克帕特里克模型是一种评估电子学习和一般教育项目有效性的方法,包括学习者的培训和业务绩效。本研究的目的是考察远程网络环境下ADDIE、Kirkpatrick和Bloom模型对学生学业成绩、自主学习和协作学习的影响及其对学习过程的影响。研究方法采用荟萃分析。经过系统的文献回顾,我们发现只有37篇文章适合进行meta分析。其中ADDIE模型有23篇,Kirkpatrick模型有9篇,Bloom模型有5篇。根据本研究的结果,我们发现所有模型都适用于在线过程,并满足不同的学习要求。就学员的认知表现而言,所有模型都支持远程教育的有效性。此外,在上述模型中,自主学习和协作学习作为与远程教育有效性密不可分的因素,在少数研究中得到了检验。最后,所有三种模型都强化了学生的积极态度和观念,甚至在将获得的知识转移到工作场所的同时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) is a peer-reviewed quarterly e-journal. International in scope, this scholarly e-journal publishes refereed articles focusing on the issues and challenges of providing theory, research and information services to global learners in any kind of distance education or open learning applications. TOJDE will particularly strive to meet the continuing education needs of practitioners and educators by providing a forum for the discussion of extended learning strategies, policies and practices, and trends in information technology as they impact the delivery of student support services for distance learners and faculties.
期刊最新文献
A MIXED-METHODS STUDY OF SCHOOL LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION: ARE THEY COMPETENCE WITH TPACK IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT? ONLINE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN THE TURKISH CONTEXT: A PRISMA-BASED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW LEARNING ANALYTICS FOR PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: DETERMINING JOURNAL PUBLICATION TRENDS LEARNING LIFE SKILLS THROUGH MULTICULTURAL EXCHANGE: AN EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR FEEDBACK IN THE DIGITAL WORLD: AN ONLINE LEARNING OPPORTUNITY FOR ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1