“We are not labors; we are teachers”: Indonesian early childhood teachers’ organizations as a form of a panopticon

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Futures in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1177/14782103231208854
Hani Yulindrasari, Vina Adriany
{"title":"“We are not labors; we are teachers”: Indonesian early childhood teachers’ organizations as a form of a panopticon","authors":"Hani Yulindrasari, Vina Adriany","doi":"10.1177/14782103231208854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to unpack the discourses of teachers’ professionalism and teachers’ organizations in the early childhood education settings in Indonesia. Using Foucault's notions of discourse and power, we are interested in exploring how both discourses have silenced the teachers. This paper adopts qualitative research conducted with nine teachers, all active members, and boards of ECE teachers’ organizations. The data were collected mainly through semi-formal interviews and focus group discussions. The data were analyzed using a thematic approach. The findings suggest how the teachers’ organization has acted as a form of panopticon that sustains the hegemonic definition of teachers’ professionalism. The findings also suggest that the teachers’ understanding of professionalism is also highly influenced by the local/Javanese values of halus, where teaching is seen as a noble and refined profession. Hence, teachers continue to create the binary between teaching and working. At the same time, the penetration of religious discourse has also situated them to accept their situation. This paper, therefore, serves as an invitation to rethink and reimagine the kind of policies and educational reform needed so that the teachers can have a space to voice their struggle.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231208854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to unpack the discourses of teachers’ professionalism and teachers’ organizations in the early childhood education settings in Indonesia. Using Foucault's notions of discourse and power, we are interested in exploring how both discourses have silenced the teachers. This paper adopts qualitative research conducted with nine teachers, all active members, and boards of ECE teachers’ organizations. The data were collected mainly through semi-formal interviews and focus group discussions. The data were analyzed using a thematic approach. The findings suggest how the teachers’ organization has acted as a form of panopticon that sustains the hegemonic definition of teachers’ professionalism. The findings also suggest that the teachers’ understanding of professionalism is also highly influenced by the local/Javanese values of halus, where teaching is seen as a noble and refined profession. Hence, teachers continue to create the binary between teaching and working. At the same time, the penetration of religious discourse has also situated them to accept their situation. This paper, therefore, serves as an invitation to rethink and reimagine the kind of policies and educational reform needed so that the teachers can have a space to voice their struggle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们不是劳动者;我们是老师”:印尼幼儿教师组织就像一个圆形监狱
本文旨在揭示印尼幼儿教育背景下教师专业主义与教师组织的话语。利用福柯的话语和权力的概念,我们有兴趣探索这两种话语是如何使教师沉默的。本文采用定性研究的方法,对9名教师、所有活跃成员和欧洲经委会教师组织董事会进行了调查。数据收集主要通过半正式访谈和焦点小组讨论。使用专题方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,教师组织作为一种圆形监狱的形式,维持了教师专业主义的霸权定义。研究结果还表明,教师对专业精神的理解也受到当地/爪哇的halus价值观的高度影响,在这些价值观中,教学被视为一种高尚而精致的职业。因此,教师继续创造教学和工作之间的二元对立。同时,宗教话语的渗透也使他们不得不接受自己的处境。因此,本文邀请大家重新思考和设想所需的政策和教育改革,以便教师能够有一个空间来表达他们的斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
An analysis of Australian teacher workforce policy: Challenges and opportunities for teacher recruitment and retention Guest editorial: Considering the global-local relationships in education Perpetual emergency education: Urban refugee education in Thailand is disrupted during the COVID-19 Governance dynamics and local autonomy in large-scale governmental funding: The case of Sweden’s campaign to improve equity Tracing neoliberal discourse in school documentation. The analysis of educational projects in Barcelona state schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1