Power and inclusion. German and Swedish special educators’ roles and work in inclusive schools

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/00313831.2023.2263481
Wieland Wermke, Inken Beck
{"title":"Power and inclusion. German and Swedish special educators’ roles and work in inclusive schools","authors":"Wieland Wermke, Inken Beck","doi":"10.1080/00313831.2023.2263481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comparative interview study (N = 45) with Swedish and German special educators working in inclusive school settings in order to gain an understanding of how inclusive education is operationalized by the provision of special education needs (SEN) support; and how both aspects are conditioned by nation-specific particularities. Drawing on our interview analyses, we suggest an analytical device for examining and comparing the provision of SEN support in school organizations from a comparative perspective. The device is a 9-dimensional matrix, understanding the phenomenon in terms of three levels (individual, group, organizational) related to three domains (educational, social, administrative). Employing this matrix, we explain national differences in operationalizing inclusive schools. Compared with Germany, in Sweden, special educators have much more power in the inclusive school, and significantly more important decisions regarding SEN are made at an organizational level, and not only regarding individual students in need of special support.","PeriodicalId":47669,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2263481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a comparative interview study (N = 45) with Swedish and German special educators working in inclusive school settings in order to gain an understanding of how inclusive education is operationalized by the provision of special education needs (SEN) support; and how both aspects are conditioned by nation-specific particularities. Drawing on our interview analyses, we suggest an analytical device for examining and comparing the provision of SEN support in school organizations from a comparative perspective. The device is a 9-dimensional matrix, understanding the phenomenon in terms of three levels (individual, group, organizational) related to three domains (educational, social, administrative). Employing this matrix, we explain national differences in operationalizing inclusive schools. Compared with Germany, in Sweden, special educators have much more power in the inclusive school, and significantly more important decisions regarding SEN are made at an organizational level, and not only regarding individual students in need of special support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力和包容。德国和瑞典特殊教育工作者在全纳学校中的角色和工作
本文对在全纳学校工作的瑞典和德国特殊教育工作者进行了一项比较访谈研究(N = 45),以了解全纳教育是如何通过提供特殊教育需求(SEN)支持来实施的;以及这两个方面是如何受到国家特殊性的制约的。根据我们的访谈分析,我们建议一种分析方法,从比较的角度来检查和比较学校组织提供的特殊教育支持。该装置是一个9维矩阵,从三个层面(个人、团体、组织)来理解与三个领域(教育、社会、行政)相关的现象。利用这个矩阵,我们解释了在实施包容性学校方面的国家差异。与德国相比,瑞典的特殊教育工作者在全纳学校中拥有更大的权力,并且在组织层面上做出更多关于特殊教育的重要决策,而不仅仅是针对需要特殊支持的个别学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research is an international refereed research journal focusing on central ideas and themes in educational thinking and research. The journal welcomes reports on philosophical, historical, comparative, experimental and survey studies and has no preferences - except quality - concerning the authors" choices of methodological perspectives. The journal reflects ongoing educational research in the nordic countries. It also encourages scholarly discussions on vital concepts, new issues and themes of importance for education in the future.
期刊最新文献
Gifted students’ experiences with participation in enrichment programs at talent centers in Norway “We tend to underestimate the children!” – a qualitative analysis of preschool teachers’ views on child-parent-teacher relationship-building during preschool transition Life purposes of Finnish adolescents Anxious boys and girls under the teacher’s radar: Students’ perceptions of academic problems and help in compulsory school Sustainably on the seas of academia: comparing metaphors of social and independent academic writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1