Social interaction, support preferences, and the use of wearable health trackers

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Frontiers in Communication Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.3389/fcomm.2023.1256452
Natalie Pennington, Linda Dam
{"title":"Social interaction, support preferences, and the use of wearable health trackers","authors":"Natalie Pennington, Linda Dam","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2023.1256452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Drawing on uses and gratifications theory, social cognitive theory, and related work, this research assessed how social factors relate to reported weekly use and behavioral intentions toward the use of wearable health trackers (WHT). Methods Through two studies we surveyed current users of WHT, including smartwatches, to better understand what factors encouraged engagement. Study One ( N = 333) consisted of a college student sample. Study Two ( N = 319) was conducted through an online panel from Prolific. Results For Study One, results suggested that connection, social comparison, and one's comfort with seeking support predicted weekly use, while need for support was a negative predictor of device use. In terms of behavioral intentions, connection and one's comfort with seeking support remained positive predictors. For Study Two, only one's comfort with seeking support predicted weekly use, while one's comfort with seeking support and social sharing both predicted behavioral intentions. Additional analysis in Study Two comparing users of dedicated WHT and smartwatches also found differences in terms of behavioral intentions and social sharing. Discussion Collectively, the two studies offer insight into what social factors contribute to the use of WHT, including evidence that one's need for support for exercise may serve as a barrier to WHT use.","PeriodicalId":31739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Communication","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1256452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Drawing on uses and gratifications theory, social cognitive theory, and related work, this research assessed how social factors relate to reported weekly use and behavioral intentions toward the use of wearable health trackers (WHT). Methods Through two studies we surveyed current users of WHT, including smartwatches, to better understand what factors encouraged engagement. Study One ( N = 333) consisted of a college student sample. Study Two ( N = 319) was conducted through an online panel from Prolific. Results For Study One, results suggested that connection, social comparison, and one's comfort with seeking support predicted weekly use, while need for support was a negative predictor of device use. In terms of behavioral intentions, connection and one's comfort with seeking support remained positive predictors. For Study Two, only one's comfort with seeking support predicted weekly use, while one's comfort with seeking support and social sharing both predicted behavioral intentions. Additional analysis in Study Two comparing users of dedicated WHT and smartwatches also found differences in terms of behavioral intentions and social sharing. Discussion Collectively, the two studies offer insight into what social factors contribute to the use of WHT, including evidence that one's need for support for exercise may serve as a barrier to WHT use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交互动,支持偏好,以及可穿戴健康追踪器的使用
利用使用和满足理论、社会认知理论和相关工作,本研究评估了社会因素与报告的每周使用情况和使用可穿戴健康追踪器(WHT)的行为意图之间的关系。通过两项研究,我们调查了《WHT》的当前用户,包括智能手表,以更好地了解是什么因素促进了用户粘性。研究一(N = 333)由大学生样本组成。研究二(N = 319)是通过多产的在线小组进行的。研究一的结果表明,联系、社会比较和寻求支持的舒适度预测了每周的使用情况,而支持需求是设备使用的负面预测因子。在行为意图方面,联系和寻求支持的舒适度仍然是积极的预测因素。在研究二中,只有寻求支持的舒适性预测每周使用,而寻求支持和社交分享的舒适性都预测行为意图。研究二的另一项分析比较了专用WHT和智能手表的用户,也发现了行为意图和社交分享方面的差异。总的来说,这两项研究提供了社会因素对WHT使用的影响,包括一个人对运动支持的需求可能成为WHT使用的障碍的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
284
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Causal inference of diachronic semantic maps from cross-linguistic synchronic polysemy data I'd rather be a cyborg than a celebrity: Black feminism in the digital music industry Feminist HCI and narratives of design semantics in DIY music hardware Designing understandable, action-oriented, and well-perceived earthquake risk maps—The Swiss case study Topic modeling three decades of climate change news in Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1