Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin, Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor
{"title":"What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? – A systematic literature review","authors":"Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin, Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor","doi":"10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the development of the notion of the teacher-researcher, a range of published action research studies have focused on school-based pedagogy. Scholars agree that action research is an essential tool for teachers to improve their practice, but there is little known about the process underpinning teachers’ choice of particular action research methodologies in primary science education. In this systematic literature review, 33 articles were reviewed to examine the methodological considerations teacher-researchers made when conducting action research within the primary school context, as well as the quality of the action plans and the impacts of the research on children’s learning in science. The systematic review navigated existing primary science studies, focusing on methodological considerations in the choice of particular types of action research. With regards to the quality of action research studies, the reviewed articles had a good average score for all three types of validity. In terms of the effects of the employed action research methodologies, most studies demonstrated positive impacts on children’s learning in science. Based on this review, it is recommended that future researchers be encouraged to carry out action research in their classroom settings, as most authors in the review favour this approach. Researchers should also examine the outcome, process, and democratic validity of their action research studies to generate better quality action plans. Lastly, primary school science teachers can adopt the various action research methodologies employed in this review since most studies support their positive impacts on children’s learning in science.","PeriodicalId":47325,"journal":{"name":"Educational Action Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the development of the notion of the teacher-researcher, a range of published action research studies have focused on school-based pedagogy. Scholars agree that action research is an essential tool for teachers to improve their practice, but there is little known about the process underpinning teachers’ choice of particular action research methodologies in primary science education. In this systematic literature review, 33 articles were reviewed to examine the methodological considerations teacher-researchers made when conducting action research within the primary school context, as well as the quality of the action plans and the impacts of the research on children’s learning in science. The systematic review navigated existing primary science studies, focusing on methodological considerations in the choice of particular types of action research. With regards to the quality of action research studies, the reviewed articles had a good average score for all three types of validity. In terms of the effects of the employed action research methodologies, most studies demonstrated positive impacts on children’s learning in science. Based on this review, it is recommended that future researchers be encouraged to carry out action research in their classroom settings, as most authors in the review favour this approach. Researchers should also examine the outcome, process, and democratic validity of their action research studies to generate better quality action plans. Lastly, primary school science teachers can adopt the various action research methodologies employed in this review since most studies support their positive impacts on children’s learning in science.
期刊介绍:
Educational Action Research is concerned with exploring the dialogue between research and practice in educational settings. The considerable increase in interest in action research in recent years has been accompanied by the development of a number of different approaches: for example, to promote reflective practice; professional development; empowerment; understanding of tacit professional knowledge; curriculum development; individual, institutional and community change; and development of democratic management and administration. Proponents of all these share the common aim of ending the dislocation of research from practice, an aim which links them with those involved in participatory research and action inquiry. This journal publishes accounts of a range of action research and related studies, in education and across the professions, with the aim of making their outcomes widely available and exemplifying the variety of possible styles of reporting. It aims to establish and maintain a review of the literature of action research. It also provides a forum for dialogue on the methodological and epistemological issues, enabling different approaches to be subjected to critical reflection and analysis. The impetus for Educational Action Research came from CARN, the Collaborative Action Research Network, and since its foundation in 1992, EAR has been important in extending and strengthening this international network.