Does population aging coexist with income inequality in the long run? Evidence from selected Asia-Pacific countries

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101149
Muhammad Raees Shaik , Soo Khoon Goh , Koi Nyen Wong , Chee Hong Law
{"title":"Does population aging coexist with income inequality in the long run? Evidence from selected Asia-Pacific countries","authors":"Muhammad Raees Shaik ,&nbsp;Soo Khoon Goh ,&nbsp;Koi Nyen Wong ,&nbsp;Chee Hong Law","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advanced countries have experienced a general rise in income inequality, whereas the outlook for income inequality in developing countries is mixed. As such, reduction in income inequality continues to be an important socio-economic development goal in many countries in the twenty-first century. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the slow progress in reducing income inequality is a manifestation of the prevailing aging population. Using a sample of countries that are currently considered aging, aged, and super-aged countries in the Asia-Pacific region, the paper empirically examines whether a long-run nexus exists between population aging and income inequality. The methodology adopted includes the augmented autoregressive distributed lag (A-ARDL) bounds test. The key results show that aging and income inequality have a long-run relationship among aged and super-aged countries. In contrast, recently graying countries show no evidence of cointegration due to their relatively early transition to aging. Some other control variables also reveal a significant impact on income inequality. Increases in the real gross domestic product per capita worsen the income distribution, but higher government expenditure can help moderate income inequality. In light of rapid population aging, the findings are useful for policy makers in designing and targeting appropriate socioeconomic policies to help mitigate income inequality in the long run based on the intensity of the share of the elderly population in the countries studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced countries have experienced a general rise in income inequality, whereas the outlook for income inequality in developing countries is mixed. As such, reduction in income inequality continues to be an important socio-economic development goal in many countries in the twenty-first century. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the slow progress in reducing income inequality is a manifestation of the prevailing aging population. Using a sample of countries that are currently considered aging, aged, and super-aged countries in the Asia-Pacific region, the paper empirically examines whether a long-run nexus exists between population aging and income inequality. The methodology adopted includes the augmented autoregressive distributed lag (A-ARDL) bounds test. The key results show that aging and income inequality have a long-run relationship among aged and super-aged countries. In contrast, recently graying countries show no evidence of cointegration due to their relatively early transition to aging. Some other control variables also reveal a significant impact on income inequality. Increases in the real gross domestic product per capita worsen the income distribution, but higher government expenditure can help moderate income inequality. In light of rapid population aging, the findings are useful for policy makers in designing and targeting appropriate socioeconomic policies to help mitigate income inequality in the long run based on the intensity of the share of the elderly population in the countries studied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人口老龄化与收入不平等是否长期并存?来自部分亚太国家的证据
发达国家的收入不平等现象普遍加剧,而发展中国家收入不平等现象的前景则喜忧参半。因此,减少收入不平等仍然是许多国家在 21 世纪的一个重要社会经济发展目标。此外,目前还不清楚减少收入不平等方面进展缓慢是否是人口普遍老龄化的表现。本文以亚太地区目前被视为老龄化国家、高龄国家和超高龄国家的国家为样本,实证研究了人口老龄化与收入不平等之间是否存在长期联系。所采用的方法包括增强自回归分布滞后(A-ARDL)边界检验。主要结果显示,在老龄化和超老龄化国家中,老龄化与收入不平等之间存在长期关系。相反,最近白发苍苍的国家由于向老龄化过渡相对较早,因此没有证据表明存在协整关系。其他一些控制变量也显示出对收入不平等的显著影响。人均实际国内生产总值的增加会使收入分配恶化,但政府支出的增加有助于缓和收入不平等。鉴于人口迅速老龄化,研究结果有助于政策制定者根据所研究国家的老年人口比例强度,设计并有针对性地实施适当的社会经济政策,帮助长期缓解收入不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comovement and Global Imbalances of Current Accounts Demographic transition and inflation The impact of the heterogenous fiscal policy stance of euro-area member states on ECB monetary policy Environmental protection taxes and green productivity: Evidence from listed companies in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1