The cost of universal design for public buildings: exploring a realistic, context-dependent research approach

IF 1.8 1区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1108/arch-07-2023-0178
Elke Ielegems, Jan Vanrie
{"title":"The cost of universal design for public buildings: exploring a realistic, context-dependent research approach","authors":"Elke Ielegems, Jan Vanrie","doi":"10.1108/arch-07-2023-0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose A challenge in implementing Universal Design (UD) is the perceived additional cost, which acts as a barrier to its widespread adoption. The few studies that have examined the cost for UD apply a theoretical research approach, failing to account for the unique design context that influences construction costs. This article presents a research methodology to calculate the UD cost in a realistic, context-dependent manner. Design/methodology/approach To address this gap, “Research-by-Design” is applied in a case study approach involving twelve cases from three typologies: secondary schools, town halls and small retail shops. Two scenarios are compared to the existing situation: (1) “renovating into a 100% inclusive building” and (2) “building fully inclusive right away”. Findings Although the methodology is time-consuming, it allows for a fair, realistic and detailed comparison between costs in different scenarios and cases. Findings show how financial implications are strongly related to its scale. Both “renovation” and “new build” scenarios involve costs, but these are considerably lower for the latter. “Circulation” and “Exterior stairs and ramps” are among the most expensive to renovate, but have almost no additional cost in the examined cases for the “new build scenario”. Research limitations/implications The research methodology presented in this study is time-consuming, which may limit its feasibility for large-scale cost assessments in diverse contexts. Practical implications The research methodology proposed in this study provides valuable insights for architects, designers and stakeholders involved in the implementation of UD. It offers a realistic and context-dependent approach to assess the cost implications of UD, enabling informed decision-making during the design and construction phases. Social implications By revealing the specific cost implications of UD in different building contexts, this study contributes to promoting greater accessibility and inclusion in the built environment. Originality/value The applied approach distinguishes this study for its ability to provide rich contextual information on actual cost implications for UD. By considering real cases and their unique design contexts, valuable insights are offered into the true costs of implementing UD in the built environment.","PeriodicalId":51801,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-07-2023-0178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose A challenge in implementing Universal Design (UD) is the perceived additional cost, which acts as a barrier to its widespread adoption. The few studies that have examined the cost for UD apply a theoretical research approach, failing to account for the unique design context that influences construction costs. This article presents a research methodology to calculate the UD cost in a realistic, context-dependent manner. Design/methodology/approach To address this gap, “Research-by-Design” is applied in a case study approach involving twelve cases from three typologies: secondary schools, town halls and small retail shops. Two scenarios are compared to the existing situation: (1) “renovating into a 100% inclusive building” and (2) “building fully inclusive right away”. Findings Although the methodology is time-consuming, it allows for a fair, realistic and detailed comparison between costs in different scenarios and cases. Findings show how financial implications are strongly related to its scale. Both “renovation” and “new build” scenarios involve costs, but these are considerably lower for the latter. “Circulation” and “Exterior stairs and ramps” are among the most expensive to renovate, but have almost no additional cost in the examined cases for the “new build scenario”. Research limitations/implications The research methodology presented in this study is time-consuming, which may limit its feasibility for large-scale cost assessments in diverse contexts. Practical implications The research methodology proposed in this study provides valuable insights for architects, designers and stakeholders involved in the implementation of UD. It offers a realistic and context-dependent approach to assess the cost implications of UD, enabling informed decision-making during the design and construction phases. Social implications By revealing the specific cost implications of UD in different building contexts, this study contributes to promoting greater accessibility and inclusion in the built environment. Originality/value The applied approach distinguishes this study for its ability to provide rich contextual information on actual cost implications for UD. By considering real cases and their unique design contexts, valuable insights are offered into the true costs of implementing UD in the built environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共建筑通用设计的成本:探索一种现实的、依赖于环境的研究方法
实施通用设计(UD)的一个挑战是可感知的额外成本,这是其广泛采用的障碍。少数研究采用了理论研究方法,未能考虑到影响建筑成本的独特设计环境。本文提出了一种研究方法,以一种现实的、依赖于环境的方式来计算开发成本。设计/方法/方法为了解决这一差距,“设计研究”应用于案例研究方法,涉及来自三种类型的12个案例:中学、市政厅和小型零售商店。对比现有的两种情况:(1)“改造成100%包容性的建筑”和(2)“马上建成完全包容性的建筑”。尽管该方法耗时,但它可以公平、现实和详细地比较不同情况下的成本。研究结果表明,财政影响如何与其规模密切相关。“翻新”和“新建”场景都涉及成本,但后者的成本要低得多。“循环”和“外部楼梯和坡道”是最昂贵的翻新,但在“新建方案”的审查案例中几乎没有额外的成本。本研究中提出的研究方法耗时,这可能会限制其在不同情况下进行大规模成本评估的可行性。本研究提出的研究方法为建筑师、设计师和参与实施可持续发展的利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解。它提供了一种现实的、与环境相关的方法来评估UD的成本影响,从而在设计和施工阶段做出明智的决策。通过揭示在不同的建筑环境中使用UD的具体成本影响,本研究有助于促进建筑环境的可达性和包容性。独创性/价值应用方法使这项研究与众不同,因为它能够提供丰富的关于开发计划署实际成本影响的背景信息。通过考虑实际案例及其独特的设计背景,对在建筑环境中实施UD的真实成本提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
35.50%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal of architecture, urban design and planning, and built environment studies. The journal aims at establishing a bridge between theory and practice in these fields. The journal acts as a platform that reports on the latest research findings for examining buildings and urban environments and debates innovative approaches for creating responsive environments. Archnet-IJAR is truly international and aims at strengthening ties between scholars, academics, and practitioners from the global north and the global south with contributors and readers reaching across the boundaries of cultures and geographies.
期刊最新文献
Leaving no one behind: unveiling gaps in inclusive architecture at the UIA World Congress of architects 2023 The cost of universal design for public buildings: exploring a realistic, context-dependent research approach How a high-modernism project in South Korea failed: Sewoon Sangga (1966–1972), the first experimental modern planning Enhancing children's social and cognitive development through play space design Toward smart sustainable cities: assessment of stakeholders' readiness for digital participatory planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1