Baseline Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Use Strongly Attenuates the Uric Acid-Elevating Effect of Thiazide Exposure

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.58600/eurjther1889
Alper Tuna Güven, Murat Özdede, Yusuf Ziya Şener
{"title":"Baseline Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Use Strongly Attenuates the Uric Acid-Elevating Effect of Thiazide Exposure","authors":"Alper Tuna Güven, Murat Özdede, Yusuf Ziya Şener","doi":"10.58600/eurjther1889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Thiazide diuretics are among the major anti-hypertensive medications. However, their hyperuricemic effect restricts their use in patients with gout. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) initiation lowers serum uric acid (SUA) levels. It is not known whether existing SGLT-2i use affects the SUA increasing effect of thiazides. Methods: Post-hoc data analysis of our published study was conducted. Hypertensive patients who were initiated on thiazide diuretics or whose dose escalated were included (thiazide exposure). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were acquired via an electronic database. Patients were grouped according to SGLT-2i presence at the time of thiazide exposure. Since the number of SGLT-2i users was low, bootstrapping via simple random sampling was performed. Results: 144 patients were included in the study, of whom 13 were on SGLT-2i. Initial sample analysis revealed that while baseline SUA levels were similar between groups, SUA change was significantly lower after thiazide exposure among patients receiving SGLT-2i (0.6 vs. 0.2, p = 0.039). Similarly, baseline SUA levels were similar, but SUA change after thiazide exposure was significantly lower among patients receiving SGLT-2 on bootstrapped data (0.13 [-0.25 - 0.57, 95%CI], vs. 0.61 [0.45 - 0.78, 95%CI], mean difference = 0.48, [0.04 - 0.91, 95%CI], p = 0.029). Conclusion: This study revealed that thiazide diuretics may be a safe anti-hypertensive medication in terms of hyperuricemia among patients using SGLT-2i. Further studies with similar outcomes may result in the elimination of restrictive recommendations for the use of thiazides in patients with hyperuricemia or gout, provided patients are on SGLT-2i.","PeriodicalId":42642,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Thiazide diuretics are among the major anti-hypertensive medications. However, their hyperuricemic effect restricts their use in patients with gout. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) initiation lowers serum uric acid (SUA) levels. It is not known whether existing SGLT-2i use affects the SUA increasing effect of thiazides. Methods: Post-hoc data analysis of our published study was conducted. Hypertensive patients who were initiated on thiazide diuretics or whose dose escalated were included (thiazide exposure). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were acquired via an electronic database. Patients were grouped according to SGLT-2i presence at the time of thiazide exposure. Since the number of SGLT-2i users was low, bootstrapping via simple random sampling was performed. Results: 144 patients were included in the study, of whom 13 were on SGLT-2i. Initial sample analysis revealed that while baseline SUA levels were similar between groups, SUA change was significantly lower after thiazide exposure among patients receiving SGLT-2i (0.6 vs. 0.2, p = 0.039). Similarly, baseline SUA levels were similar, but SUA change after thiazide exposure was significantly lower among patients receiving SGLT-2 on bootstrapped data (0.13 [-0.25 - 0.57, 95%CI], vs. 0.61 [0.45 - 0.78, 95%CI], mean difference = 0.48, [0.04 - 0.91, 95%CI], p = 0.029). Conclusion: This study revealed that thiazide diuretics may be a safe anti-hypertensive medication in terms of hyperuricemia among patients using SGLT-2i. Further studies with similar outcomes may result in the elimination of restrictive recommendations for the use of thiazides in patients with hyperuricemia or gout, provided patients are on SGLT-2i.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基线钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂的使用强烈减弱噻嗪暴露的尿酸升高作用
目的:噻嗪类利尿剂是主要的降压药物之一。然而,它们的高尿酸血症作用限制了它们在痛风患者中的应用。葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂钠(SGLT-2i)起始降低血清尿酸(SUA)水平。目前尚不清楚SGLT-2i的使用是否会影响噻嗪类药物增加SUA的效果。方法:对我们发表的研究进行事后数据分析。开始使用噻嗪类利尿剂或剂量增加的高血压患者被纳入(噻嗪类暴露)。通过电子数据库获取人口统计、临床和实验室数据。患者根据噻嗪暴露时SGLT-2i的存在进行分组。由于SGLT-2i用户数量较少,通过简单的随机抽样进行引导。结果:144例患者纳入研究,其中13例接受SGLT-2i治疗。初步样本分析显示,虽然两组之间的基线SUA水平相似,但在接受SGLT-2i的患者中,噻嗪暴露后SUA变化显著降低(0.6 vs. 0.2, p = 0.039)。同样,基线SUA水平相似,但在启动数据中接受SGLT-2治疗的患者中,噻嗪暴露后SUA变化显著降低(0.13 [-0.25 - 0.57,95%CI] vs. 0.61 [0.45 - 0.78, 95%CI],平均差异= 0.48,[0.04 - 0.91,95%CI], p = 0.029)。结论:本研究表明噻嗪类利尿剂对于SGLT-2i患者的高尿酸血症可能是一种安全的降压药物。类似结果的进一步研究可能导致取消对高尿酸血症或痛风患者使用噻嗪类药物的限制性建议,前提是患者服用SGLT-2i。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Therapeutics
European Journal of Therapeutics MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Adalimumab Treatment in a Case of Treatment-Resistant Acne Conglobata Uncommon HLA Alleles Observed in a Poopulation of Istanbul Province Cavitating Mesenteric Lymph Node Syndrome in a Patient with Celiac Disease: Differential Diagnosis Based on Radiological Findings A Rare Cause of Unilateral Breast Mass: Burkitt Lymphoma Hello AI: Is it Time for A Revolutionary Change in the Health Professional Education System?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1