Campaigns without civil society? The involvement of organized interests in electoral politics

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Civil Society Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1080/17448689.2023.2255690
Marco Lisi, João Gaio e Silva
{"title":"Campaigns without civil society? The involvement of organized interests in electoral politics","authors":"Marco Lisi, João Gaio e Silva","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2023.2255690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTElections are key moments for interactions between civil society and representatives. While bottom-up mobilization tries to influence the composition of parliament and policy outputs, political parties and politicians engage with broader civil society to strengthen their legitimacy and to obtain strategic benefits in terms of electoral results. This study focuses on the role organized interests play in election campaigns and explains why collective societal actors do not engage in a significant way in the electoral process. By examining the Portuguese case during the 2019 elections, this study relies on data triangulation to map the involvement of organized interests in the electoral process. We argue that political parties have no incentives to foster linkages with interest groups, while civil society organizations prefer to stay in the shade or do not have opportunities to engage in electoral politics. The findings have implications not only in terms of low levels of political mobilization, but also with regard to policy innovation (and lack thereof).KEYWORDS: Organized interestspolitical partieselectionspolitical representationPortugal Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The terms ‘interest groups', ‘organized interests', ‘organized groups' or ‘organized civil society’ are used interchangeably in this text.2 Given that our primary focus is on the associational component of organized civil society, we exclude from this study individual companies, think tanks or law firms.3 The distinction between insider and outsider groups aims to distinguish between those organizations with direct contacts to decision-makers and those groups that have no access to public officials.4 See Table A1 in the online appendix for the list of abbreviations.5 The new regulations did not avoid some cases of illegal funding from private donors, mostly related to individuals or companies (see Sousa, Citation2014).6 There are some works dealing with the broader concept of civil society, but the universe of organization is wider than the types of actors surveyed in this study, as they include many civic associations that do not have any relevant activity or role in the policy-making process.7 The survey was active from January to August 2019 and was administered through Internet via one-click survey (https://www.1ka.si/d/en). Dataset and additional information are available upon request from the corresponding author.8 The interviews took place between September 2018 and June 2019, the period just before the beginning of the 2019 election campaign.9 See the online appendix (Table A3) for question wording.10 For example, in the 2019 elections nursing trade unions and several associations linked to urban mobility sent their proposals by email to all parties. These efforts usually have no direct impact on policy positions, but they can gain media visibility.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT): [Grant Number UIDB/04627/2020].","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2023.2255690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTElections are key moments for interactions between civil society and representatives. While bottom-up mobilization tries to influence the composition of parliament and policy outputs, political parties and politicians engage with broader civil society to strengthen their legitimacy and to obtain strategic benefits in terms of electoral results. This study focuses on the role organized interests play in election campaigns and explains why collective societal actors do not engage in a significant way in the electoral process. By examining the Portuguese case during the 2019 elections, this study relies on data triangulation to map the involvement of organized interests in the electoral process. We argue that political parties have no incentives to foster linkages with interest groups, while civil society organizations prefer to stay in the shade or do not have opportunities to engage in electoral politics. The findings have implications not only in terms of low levels of political mobilization, but also with regard to policy innovation (and lack thereof).KEYWORDS: Organized interestspolitical partieselectionspolitical representationPortugal Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The terms ‘interest groups', ‘organized interests', ‘organized groups' or ‘organized civil society’ are used interchangeably in this text.2 Given that our primary focus is on the associational component of organized civil society, we exclude from this study individual companies, think tanks or law firms.3 The distinction between insider and outsider groups aims to distinguish between those organizations with direct contacts to decision-makers and those groups that have no access to public officials.4 See Table A1 in the online appendix for the list of abbreviations.5 The new regulations did not avoid some cases of illegal funding from private donors, mostly related to individuals or companies (see Sousa, Citation2014).6 There are some works dealing with the broader concept of civil society, but the universe of organization is wider than the types of actors surveyed in this study, as they include many civic associations that do not have any relevant activity or role in the policy-making process.7 The survey was active from January to August 2019 and was administered through Internet via one-click survey (https://www.1ka.si/d/en). Dataset and additional information are available upon request from the corresponding author.8 The interviews took place between September 2018 and June 2019, the period just before the beginning of the 2019 election campaign.9 See the online appendix (Table A3) for question wording.10 For example, in the 2019 elections nursing trade unions and several associations linked to urban mobility sent their proposals by email to all parties. These efforts usually have no direct impact on policy positions, but they can gain media visibility.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT): [Grant Number UIDB/04627/2020].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有公民社会的运动?选举政治:有组织的利益集团参与选举政治
摘要:会议是公民社会与代表互动的关键时刻。自下而上的动员试图影响议会的组成和政策产出,而政党和政治家则与更广泛的民间社会接触,以加强其合法性,并在选举结果方面获得战略利益。本研究的重点是有组织的利益在竞选活动中发挥的作用,并解释了为什么集体社会行为者在选举过程中没有发挥重要作用。通过研究2019年选举期间的葡萄牙案例,本研究依靠数据三角测量来绘制有组织利益参与选举过程的地图。我们认为,政党没有动力与利益集团建立联系,而民间社会组织更愿意躲在阴影下,或者没有机会参与选举政治。调查结果不仅影响到政治动员水平低,而且影响到政策创新(和缺乏政策创新)。关键词:有组织利益政党选举政治代表葡萄牙披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1“利益集团”、“有组织的利益集团”、“有组织的团体”或“有组织的公民社会”等术语在本文中可互换使用鉴于我们主要关注的是有组织的公民社会的协会组成部分,我们排除了个别公司、智库或律师事务所内部团体和外部团体的区别旨在区分那些与决策者直接接触的组织和那些无法接触公共官员的组织参见在线附录表A1中的缩写词列表新条例并没有避免一些来自私人捐助者的非法资金案件,这些案件大多与个人或公司有关(见Sousa, Citation2014)有一些著作涉及更广泛的公民社会概念,但组织的范围比本研究调查的行为者类型更广泛,因为它们包括许多在决策过程中没有任何相关活动或作用的公民协会该调查于2019年1月至8月进行,通过互联网进行一键式调查(https://www.1ka.si/d/en)。数据集和附加信息可向相应作者索取这些采访发生在2018年9月至2019年6月之间,也就是2019年大选开始之前10 .问题措辞见在线附录(表A3)例如,在2019年的选举中,护理工会和几个与城市交通有关的协会通过电子邮件向所有政党发送了他们的提案。这些努力通常对政策立场没有直接影响,但它们可以获得媒体的关注。本研究由 技术基金会(FCT)资助:[批准号:UIDB/04627/2020]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Civil society and governance. A survey of local authority and NPO collaboration from an institutional perspective Enabling role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in local environmental management in the Philippines: A systematic review Claiming space in civil society. Young Muslim moral personhoods in Bangladesh and Italy Advocating for human rights of LGBTIQ+ persons in multilevel governance systems Contextual factors influencing voluntary organizations’ inclusiveness and individual participation in leisure activities: The Case of Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1