Religion and Fertility Behavior Among Ever-Married Women in Nigeria: Evidence from the Nigeria Demographic Health Survey 2018

Endurance Uzobo, Iteimowei Major
{"title":"Religion and Fertility Behavior Among Ever-Married Women in Nigeria: Evidence from the Nigeria Demographic Health Survey 2018","authors":"Endurance Uzobo, Iteimowei Major","doi":"10.36108/wjss/3202.80.0230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the 2018 Nigeria Demography and Health Survey (NDHS), this study was designed to examine the impact of religion on fertility behaviour. The theoretical basis of this study was Philip Jenkins’s Fertility and Faith hypothesis and the Religious Alloparenting hypothesis. The NDHS used a stratified sample that was chosen in two steps. First, a household listing operation was conducted in each of the chosen Enumeration Areas. Next, a fixed number of 30 households were chosen through equal probability systematic sampling in each cluster, yielding a total sample size of about 42,000 households. 42,121 women between the ages of 15 and 49 were found in the various houses, and individual interviews with 41,821 of them were later conducted. In this study, 8061 respondents were used in the analysis. Data gleaned from the NDHS was analyzed in this study, using descriptive statistics. The respondents’ religions were Catholic, other Christians, Islam and other religions. Catholic (9.4%), non-Catholic Christians (34.4%), Islam (55.5%), and other religions (0.7%). Islamic religion had low use of contraceptives i.e., 90.3% of no method, Catholics made more use of the traditional method of 12.5% than other religions. There was also a significant association between the use of contraceptives and religion. Muslim respondents got married below the age of 19 (77.3%), age 19 and 30 (22.1%) while Catholic got married below the age of 19 (34.2%), 19 and 30 (61.4%) Other Christians (36.7%) of its respondents below age 18, 19-30 (58.7%) and 31 and above (4.4%). Some of the recommendations made were to bring enlightenment to the public on the National Population Policy to guide or restrict the number of children by couples through religious leaders and also to make modern contraceptives acceptable by all religions.","PeriodicalId":497972,"journal":{"name":"WILBERFORCE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILBERFORCE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/wjss/3202.80.0230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the 2018 Nigeria Demography and Health Survey (NDHS), this study was designed to examine the impact of religion on fertility behaviour. The theoretical basis of this study was Philip Jenkins’s Fertility and Faith hypothesis and the Religious Alloparenting hypothesis. The NDHS used a stratified sample that was chosen in two steps. First, a household listing operation was conducted in each of the chosen Enumeration Areas. Next, a fixed number of 30 households were chosen through equal probability systematic sampling in each cluster, yielding a total sample size of about 42,000 households. 42,121 women between the ages of 15 and 49 were found in the various houses, and individual interviews with 41,821 of them were later conducted. In this study, 8061 respondents were used in the analysis. Data gleaned from the NDHS was analyzed in this study, using descriptive statistics. The respondents’ religions were Catholic, other Christians, Islam and other religions. Catholic (9.4%), non-Catholic Christians (34.4%), Islam (55.5%), and other religions (0.7%). Islamic religion had low use of contraceptives i.e., 90.3% of no method, Catholics made more use of the traditional method of 12.5% than other religions. There was also a significant association between the use of contraceptives and religion. Muslim respondents got married below the age of 19 (77.3%), age 19 and 30 (22.1%) while Catholic got married below the age of 19 (34.2%), 19 and 30 (61.4%) Other Christians (36.7%) of its respondents below age 18, 19-30 (58.7%) and 31 and above (4.4%). Some of the recommendations made were to bring enlightenment to the public on the National Population Policy to guide or restrict the number of children by couples through religious leaders and also to make modern contraceptives acceptable by all religions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚已婚妇女的宗教和生育行为:来自2018年尼日利亚人口健康调查的证据
本研究利用2018年尼日利亚人口与健康调查(NDHS),旨在研究宗教对生育行为的影响。本研究的理论基础是菲利普·詹金斯的生育与信仰假说和宗教异族养育假说。国家人口与健康调查采用了分两步选择的分层样本。首先,在每个选定的查点地区进行住户登记。然后,在每组中通过等概率系统抽样抽取固定数量的30户,总样本量约为4.2万户。在各个房子里发现了42121名年龄在15岁至49岁之间的妇女,随后对其中的41821人进行了个别访谈。在本研究中,8061名受访者被用于分析。本研究采用描述性统计方法对国家人口健康调查收集的数据进行分析。受访者的宗教信仰有天主教、其他基督教、伊斯兰教和其他宗教。天主教(9.4%)、非天主教基督徒(34.4%)、伊斯兰教(55.5%)和其他宗教(0.7%)。伊斯兰教使用避孕药具的比例较低,即90.3%的人不使用避孕方法,天主教徒使用传统避孕方法的比例为12.5%,高于其他宗教。使用避孕药具与宗教之间也有重要的联系。穆斯林受访者结婚年龄在19岁以下(77.3%),19岁和30岁(22.1%),而天主教徒结婚年龄在19岁以下(34.2%),19岁和30岁(61.4%)其他基督徒(36.7%)的受访者在18岁以下,19-30岁(58.7%)和31岁及以上(4.4%)。所提出的一些建议是使公众了解国家人口政策,通过宗教领袖指导或限制夫妇生育子女的数量,并使现代避孕药具为所有宗教所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COPING STRATEGY OF UNIVERSITY HOST COMMUNITIES DURING INDUSTRIAL ACTION: NIGER DELTA UNIVERSITY IN VIEW COVID-19 and the State of Conflict-Induced Internally Displaced Persons in North-Eastern Borno State of Nigeria Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies among University Undergraduate Students Of the Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State CARE AND SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR ADOLESCENT ORPHANS IN YENAGOA CITY, BAYELSA STATE, NIGERIA LESOTHO’S WHITE GOLD: A POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR VIRTUAL WATER TRADE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1