Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine and Prone Positions: A Prospective Interventional Study from Telangana, India

J Sasi Kumar, Y Anil Reddy, N Ramamurthy, Sagar Mahavir Soitkar, Ch Vamseedhar Reddy, Rahul Sharma, Nishanth Mydam, Jagdishwar Addepalli
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine and Prone Positions: A Prospective Interventional Study from Telangana, India","authors":"J Sasi Kumar, Y Anil Reddy, N Ramamurthy, Sagar Mahavir Soitkar, Ch Vamseedhar Reddy, Rahul Sharma, Nishanth Mydam, Jagdishwar Addepalli","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/64554.2921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred method for treating large or complex renal calculi. Despite positive results and apparent benefits over the prone position, there are few randomised trials comparing the supine and prone positions. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of PCNL in prone and supine positions in terms of operative time, stone-free rate, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and the level of haemoglobin drop. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted from December 2020 to December 2022, at the Department of Urology, Mamata Medical College in Khammam, Telangana, India. Patients with renal stones diagnosed by Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB) and meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Patient demographic data, operative time, stone-free rate, haemoglobin level drop, postoperative fever, and hospital stay in prone and supine positions were recorded. Statistical tests like chi-square or Fisher-exact test were used to compare proportions, and the student t-test was used to compare means. Results: The overall operative time was 79.50 minutes in the prone group and 66.78 minutes in the supine group (p=0.0213). The average hospital stay was 2.68 days in the prone group and 2.72 days in the supine group (p=0.2432). Fall in haemoglobin levels, size of stones extracted, and stone-free rate at three months between the two groups (p>0.05) showed insignificant relation. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: PCNL performed with the patient in the supine position requires significantly less time during surgery. There was no significant difference in terms of stone-free rate, hospital stay, fall in haemoglobin levels, and complications between the supine and prone groups.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/64554.2921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred method for treating large or complex renal calculi. Despite positive results and apparent benefits over the prone position, there are few randomised trials comparing the supine and prone positions. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of PCNL in prone and supine positions in terms of operative time, stone-free rate, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and the level of haemoglobin drop. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted from December 2020 to December 2022, at the Department of Urology, Mamata Medical College in Khammam, Telangana, India. Patients with renal stones diagnosed by Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB) and meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Patient demographic data, operative time, stone-free rate, haemoglobin level drop, postoperative fever, and hospital stay in prone and supine positions were recorded. Statistical tests like chi-square or Fisher-exact test were used to compare proportions, and the student t-test was used to compare means. Results: The overall operative time was 79.50 minutes in the prone group and 66.78 minutes in the supine group (p=0.0213). The average hospital stay was 2.68 days in the prone group and 2.72 days in the supine group (p=0.2432). Fall in haemoglobin levels, size of stones extracted, and stone-free rate at three months between the two groups (p>0.05) showed insignificant relation. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: PCNL performed with the patient in the supine position requires significantly less time during surgery. There was no significant difference in terms of stone-free rate, hospital stay, fall in haemoglobin levels, and complications between the supine and prone groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估经皮肾镜取石术在仰卧位和俯卧位的有效性:来自印度泰伦加纳邦的前瞻性介入研究
导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大型或复杂肾结石的首选方法。尽管有积极的结果和明显的好处,但很少有随机试验比较仰卧位和俯卧位。目的:从手术时间、结石清除率、住院时间、术后并发症及血红蛋白下降水平等方面评价PCNL在俯卧位和仰卧位的疗效。材料和方法:该研究于2020年12月至2022年12月在印度特伦加纳邦Khammam的Mamata医学院泌尿科进行。经非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)诊断为肾结石的患者,符合入选标准。记录患者人口学资料、手术时间、结石清除率、血红蛋白水平下降、术后发热、俯卧位和仰卧位住院时间。使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验等统计检验来比较比例,使用学生t检验来比较均值。结果:俯卧位组手术总时间79.50 min,仰卧位组手术总时间66.78 min (p=0.0213)。俯卧位组平均住院时间2.68 d,仰卧位组平均住院时间2.72 d (p=0.2432)。两组在3个月时血红蛋白水平下降、结石取出大小和结石去除率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:采用仰卧位进行PCNL,手术时间明显缩短。仰卧位组和俯卧位组在无结石率、住院时间、血红蛋白水平下降和并发症方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tibial Periosteal Ganglion Cyst: A Rare Case of Non Traumatic Leg Swelling Mylohyoid Bridging of the Mandible and its Clinical Importance in Dry Mandibles: A Cross-sectional Study Accuracy of Ultrasound Imaging Findings in Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: A Cross-sectional Study Morphometric Study of Different Orbital Dimensions in Dry Skull in Eastern India- A Cross-sectional Study Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography by Fungal Sinusitis: A Case-control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1