The Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Productivity in the Modern Workplace: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Leadership styles encompass all aspects of management both inside and outside of an organization, resolving conflicts, assisting and guiding employees to complete their tasks, and setting a positive example for others. The effects of several leadership philosophies on worker competency were dissected in this study. Recent findings have demonstrated that the division's production is negatively impacted by the autocratic leadership model, as evidenced by the division's poor pivot, low occupation fulfilment, high non-appearance, and bad resolve. The employment of populist, exceptional, and conditional pioneers has a major impact on workers' advancement as measured by their high morale, productivity, dedication, and commitment. The goal of the study was to determine how different leadership philosophies affect the performance of employees in the Somaliland Service of Training and Better Investigations. Four key philosophies were identified: absolutist, innovative, majority rule, and conditional administration. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that problematic, value-based, and popularity-based leadership will have a favourable correlation with worker performance. Remarkably, there is sometimes a negative correlation between imperious models and employee performance. It should also adhere to and further enhance its strong points in practicing those aspects of majority rule leadership that significantly contribute to the success of the company.