The (in)correctness of financial reports in the ESEF format of selected Polish listed companies

Katarzyna Kobiela-Pionnier
{"title":"The (in)correctness of financial reports in the ESEF format of selected Polish listed companies","authors":"Katarzyna Kobiela-Pionnier","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this article is to determine whether Polish stock exchange issuers have correctly fulfilled the obligation to use XBRL tags in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the new European Union requirement, i.e. in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).Methodology/approach: The research method used was a detailed analysis of XBRL tags used by ten randomly selected entities listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in their first annual reports prepared in the ESEF format.Findings: Issuers preparing financial statements using XBRL labels made various substantive errors in their selection, in particular, by using an inappropriate tag or creating an unnecessary extension. All identified errors violated the tagging rules con-tained in EC Delegated Regulation 2019/815 (ESEF Regulation). Based on the results, a classification (taxonomy) of substantive errors that may occur in financial statements tagged with XBRL tags from the ESMA ESEF taxonomy is proposed.Practical implications: the article may be useful both for issuers preparing financial statements using XBRL tags and for statutory auditors who are required to verify the correctness of the tags used as part of their audit obligation.Research limitations: A relatively small research group (10 companies) was used.Originality/value: This article is the first Polish-language study on errors in XBRL tags, which results from the novelty of the subject matter. In addition, due to significant differences in regulations regarding the use of XBRL between the EU and other jurisdictions (especially the US), some errors identified during the study have not yet been described in the literature; hence their proposed categorization may be a significant contribution to the literature.","PeriodicalId":53342,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to determine whether Polish stock exchange issuers have correctly fulfilled the obligation to use XBRL tags in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the new European Union requirement, i.e. in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).Methodology/approach: The research method used was a detailed analysis of XBRL tags used by ten randomly selected entities listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in their first annual reports prepared in the ESEF format.Findings: Issuers preparing financial statements using XBRL labels made various substantive errors in their selection, in particular, by using an inappropriate tag or creating an unnecessary extension. All identified errors violated the tagging rules con-tained in EC Delegated Regulation 2019/815 (ESEF Regulation). Based on the results, a classification (taxonomy) of substantive errors that may occur in financial statements tagged with XBRL tags from the ESMA ESEF taxonomy is proposed.Practical implications: the article may be useful both for issuers preparing financial statements using XBRL tags and for statutory auditors who are required to verify the correctness of the tags used as part of their audit obligation.Research limitations: A relatively small research group (10 companies) was used.Originality/value: This article is the first Polish-language study on errors in XBRL tags, which results from the novelty of the subject matter. In addition, due to significant differences in regulations regarding the use of XBRL between the EU and other jurisdictions (especially the US), some errors identified during the study have not yet been described in the literature; hence their proposed categorization may be a significant contribution to the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定波兰上市公司ESEF格式财务报告的正确性
目的:本文的目的是确定波兰证券交易所发行人是否正确履行了在按照欧盟新要求编制的合并财务报表中使用XBRL标签的义务,即欧洲单一电子格式(ESEF)。方法/方法:所使用的研究方法是对华沙证券交易所随机选择的10个上市实体在其以ESEF格式编写的第一份年度报告中使用的XBRL标签进行详细分析。发现:使用XBRL标签编制财务报表的发行人在选择上存在各种实质性错误,特别是使用不适当的标签或创建不必要的扩展。所有发现的错误都违反了EC授权法规2019/815 (ESEF法规)中包含的标签规则。基于这些结果,提出了对使用ESMA ESEF分类法中的XBRL标签标记的财务报表中可能出现的实质性错误的分类(分类法)。实际意义:本文可能对使用XBRL标签准备财务报表的发行人和作为审计义务的一部分需要验证所使用标签正确性的法定审计员都很有用。研究局限性:使用的研究小组相对较小(10家公司)。原创性/价值:本文是关于XBRL标签中的错误的第一篇波兰语研究,这是由于主题的新颖性造成的。此外,由于欧盟和其他司法管辖区(尤其是美国)在使用XBRL方面的法规存在显著差异,研究过程中发现的一些错误尚未在文献中描述;因此,他们提出的分类可能是对文献的重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Redefining accounting as a technical, social and moral practice to better the world The (in)correctness of financial reports in the ESEF format of selected Polish listed companies The financial results of Polish State Forests and profit distribution – in the opinions of stakeholders Measuring the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals by companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in the light of the UNCTAD-ISAR guidance The sense of legal professional responsibility among accountants in Poland. A pilot qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1