Finding the optimal strategy for quantitative sampling of springtails community (Hexapoda: Collembola) in glacial lithosols

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pedobiologia Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150914
Barbara Valle , Mauro Gobbi , Mattia Brambilla , Marina Serena Borgatti , Marco Caccianiga
{"title":"Finding the optimal strategy for quantitative sampling of springtails community (Hexapoda: Collembola) in glacial lithosols","authors":"Barbara Valle ,&nbsp;Mauro Gobbi ,&nbsp;Mattia Brambilla ,&nbsp;Marina Serena Borgatti ,&nbsp;Marco Caccianiga","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) play a key role in biological community in glacial ecosystems and represent important ecological indicators in such threatened habitats. An effective sampling protocol for springtail community that optimizes sampling effort in the peculiar conditions of glacial lithosols is not available. We tested three sampling methods on the Sforzellina glacier (Central Italian Alps) in 21 sampling points. For each sampling point, we performed: 1. Tullgren funnels; 2. Flotation method; 3. Pitfall trapping. The potential effect of different sampling methods on species detection was evaluated by ANOVA and by N-mixture models for Flotation method and Tullgren funnels. The incidence coverage estimator (ICE) was used to test the performance of each sampling method comparing the observed vs estimated species richness. Our analysis showed that the sampling method affected the number of species and individuals recorded. Tullgren funnels collected the highest number of species, pitfall trapping the highest average number of species, but did not detect soil species. The observed/estimated species ratio was higher for pitfall trapping and Tullgren funnels than for flotation. The combination of pitfall trapping with Tullgren funnels or flotation method resulted optimal in terms of number of species and functional types recorded. Flotation method collected more than twice the number of specimens obtained with Tullgren, indicating a higher ability to extract springtails from mineral soil. Flotation method and Tullgren funnels detected the same community, from a functional point of view, but only flotation method collected all the most abundant species. These results indicate that a combination of pitfall trapping and flotation should be evaluated in order to maximize the obtained information in terms of specie assemblage composition and functional categories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829/pdfft?md5=81ba29ee72675de455f44d029443076b&pid=1-s2.0-S0031405623079829-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) play a key role in biological community in glacial ecosystems and represent important ecological indicators in such threatened habitats. An effective sampling protocol for springtail community that optimizes sampling effort in the peculiar conditions of glacial lithosols is not available. We tested three sampling methods on the Sforzellina glacier (Central Italian Alps) in 21 sampling points. For each sampling point, we performed: 1. Tullgren funnels; 2. Flotation method; 3. Pitfall trapping. The potential effect of different sampling methods on species detection was evaluated by ANOVA and by N-mixture models for Flotation method and Tullgren funnels. The incidence coverage estimator (ICE) was used to test the performance of each sampling method comparing the observed vs estimated species richness. Our analysis showed that the sampling method affected the number of species and individuals recorded. Tullgren funnels collected the highest number of species, pitfall trapping the highest average number of species, but did not detect soil species. The observed/estimated species ratio was higher for pitfall trapping and Tullgren funnels than for flotation. The combination of pitfall trapping with Tullgren funnels or flotation method resulted optimal in terms of number of species and functional types recorded. Flotation method collected more than twice the number of specimens obtained with Tullgren, indicating a higher ability to extract springtails from mineral soil. Flotation method and Tullgren funnels detected the same community, from a functional point of view, but only flotation method collected all the most abundant species. These results indicate that a combination of pitfall trapping and flotation should be evaluated in order to maximize the obtained information in terms of specie assemblage composition and functional categories.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
题目:寻找冰川岩石层中弹尾群落(六足目:弹尾纲)定量采样的最佳策略
弹尾(六足目:弹尾目)在冰川生态系统中起着重要的生物群落作用,是冰川生态系统中重要的生态指标。在冰川岩石层的特殊条件下,没有一种有效的采样方案来优化采样工作。我们在斯福泽利纳冰川(意大利中部阿尔卑斯山脉)的21个采样点上测试了三种采样方法。对于每个采样点,我们执行:Tullgren漏斗;2. 浮选方法;3.陷阱诱捕。采用方差分析和n -混合物模型(浮选法和Tullgren漏斗)对不同采样方法对物种检测的潜在影响进行了评估。利用发生率覆盖度估计器(ICE)对不同采样方法的物种丰富度进行比较。我们的分析表明,采样方法影响了记录的物种数量和个体数量。Tullgren漏斗收集的物种数量最多,陷阱诱捕的平均物种数量最多,但未检测到土壤物种。陷阱捕集和Tullgren漏斗的观察/估计物种比高于浮选。陷阱捕集法与Tullgren漏斗法或浮选法相结合,在记录的种类数量和功能类型方面效果最佳。浮选法收集的样本数量是Tullgren法的两倍多,表明从矿物土壤中提取弹尾虫的能力更高。从功能角度看,浮选法和Tullgren漏斗法检测到的群落相同,但只有浮选法收集到的物种最多。这些结果表明,为了最大限度地获得物种组合组成和功能类别方面的信息,应该评估陷阱捕获和浮选的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedobiologia
Pedobiologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments. Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions. We publish: original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects); descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research; innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.
期刊最新文献
Asian knotweed’s impacts on soil chemistry and enzyme activities are higher in soils with low-nutrient status Communicating about soil biodiversity: Insights from science editorials and future recommendations Attraction of pitfall trap preservation fluids complicates the estimation of Collembola density Insecticide exposure can increase burrow network production and alter burrow network structure in soil dwelling insects (Agriotes spp.) Differential effects of urbanization-induced heavy metal pollution on soil microbial communities under evergreen and deciduous trees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1