Thick Description for Critical AI: Generating Data Capitalism and Provocations for a Multisensory Approach

Caroline E. Schuster, Kristen M. Schuster
{"title":"Thick Description for Critical AI: Generating Data Capitalism and Provocations for a Multisensory Approach","authors":"Caroline E. Schuster, Kristen M. Schuster","doi":"10.1215/2834703x-10734056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that critical AI studies should make a methodological investment in “thick description” to counteract the tendency both within computational design and business settings to presume (or, in the case of start-ups, hope for) a seamless and inevitable journey from data to monetizable domain knowledge and useful services. Perhaps the classic application of that critical data-studies framework is Marion Fourcade and Kevin Healy's influential 2017 essay, “Seeing Like a Market,” which advances a comprehensive account of how value is extracted from data-collection processes. As important as these critiques have been, the apparent inevitability of this assemblage of power, knowledge, and profit arises in part through the metaphor of “sight.” Thick description—especially when combined with a feminist and queer attention to embodiment, materiality, and multisensory experience—can in this respect supplement Fourcade and Healey's critique by revealing unexpected imaginative possibilities built out of social materialities.","PeriodicalId":500906,"journal":{"name":"Critical AI","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-10734056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that critical AI studies should make a methodological investment in “thick description” to counteract the tendency both within computational design and business settings to presume (or, in the case of start-ups, hope for) a seamless and inevitable journey from data to monetizable domain knowledge and useful services. Perhaps the classic application of that critical data-studies framework is Marion Fourcade and Kevin Healy's influential 2017 essay, “Seeing Like a Market,” which advances a comprehensive account of how value is extracted from data-collection processes. As important as these critiques have been, the apparent inevitability of this assemblage of power, knowledge, and profit arises in part through the metaphor of “sight.” Thick description—especially when combined with a feminist and queer attention to embodiment, materiality, and multisensory experience—can in this respect supplement Fourcade and Healey's critique by revealing unexpected imaginative possibilities built out of social materialities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键人工智能的厚描述:为多感官方法生成数据资本主义和挑衅
本文认为,关键的人工智能研究应该在方法论上投资于“厚描述”,以抵消计算设计和商业环境中假设(或者,在初创企业的情况下,希望)从数据到可货币化的领域知识和有用服务的无缝和不可避免的旅程的趋势。也许这一关键数据研究框架的经典应用是Marion Fourcade和Kevin Healy在2017年发表的有影响力的文章《像市场一样看》(Seeing Like a Market),这篇文章全面阐述了如何从数据收集过程中提取价值。与这些批评同样重要的是,这种权力、知识和利益的集合显然是不可避免的,部分是通过“视觉”的隐喻产生的。厚重的描述——尤其是当与女权主义者和酷儿对化身、物质性和多感官体验的关注结合在一起时——可以在这方面补充Fourcade和Healey的批判,揭示出基于社会物质性的意想不到的想象可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Photographic Pipeline of Machine Vision; or, Machine Vision's Latent Photographic Theory The Shame Machine: Who Profits in the New Age of Humiliation Thick Description for Critical AI: Generating Data Capitalism and Provocations for a Multisensory Approach How to Make “AI” Intelligent; or, The Question of Epistemic Equality Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1