What Role Do Occupational Differences Play in Subjective Working Conditions Throughout the COVID‐19 Pandemic?

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1111/soin.12574
Roos van der Zwan, Mara A. Yerkes, Janna W. Besamusca, Peter M. Kruyen, Chantal L. H. S. Remery
{"title":"What Role Do Occupational Differences Play in Subjective Working Conditions Throughout the COVID‐19 Pandemic?","authors":"Roos van der Zwan, Mara A. Yerkes, Janna W. Besamusca, Peter M. Kruyen, Chantal L. H. S. Remery","doi":"10.1111/soin.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence on the role of occupational differences in subjective working conditions during the pandemic is limited. However, an understanding of how such inequalities develop throughout the pandemic is needed to prevent an overall worsening of social inequality in society. We study occupational inequalities in subjective working conditions—work pressure and work‐life balance—throughout the pandemic. We use four waves of the representative, probability‐based COVID Gender (In)equality Survey Netherlands (COGIS‐NL), collected between April 2020 and November 2020 in The Netherlands. The results show that higher work pressure is reported during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, particularly among managers and professionals and white‐collar workers. Occupational differences are also found in the probability of having difficulty combining work and care during the pandemic, with managers and professionals most likely to report having difficulty. These differences are no longer evident after controlling for respondent and job characteristics. This longitudinal evidence on occupational differences in subjective working conditions within the working population contributes to a better understanding of social inequalities arising and developing throughout the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47699,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Inquiry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence on the role of occupational differences in subjective working conditions during the pandemic is limited. However, an understanding of how such inequalities develop throughout the pandemic is needed to prevent an overall worsening of social inequality in society. We study occupational inequalities in subjective working conditions—work pressure and work‐life balance—throughout the pandemic. We use four waves of the representative, probability‐based COVID Gender (In)equality Survey Netherlands (COGIS‐NL), collected between April 2020 and November 2020 in The Netherlands. The results show that higher work pressure is reported during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, particularly among managers and professionals and white‐collar workers. Occupational differences are also found in the probability of having difficulty combining work and care during the pandemic, with managers and professionals most likely to report having difficulty. These differences are no longer evident after controlling for respondent and job characteristics. This longitudinal evidence on occupational differences in subjective working conditions within the working population contributes to a better understanding of social inequalities arising and developing throughout the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID - 19大流行期间,职业差异在主观工作条件中发挥了什么作用?
关于职业差异在大流行期间主观工作条件中的作用的证据有限。然而,需要了解这种不平等在整个大流行病期间是如何发展的,以防止社会中的社会不平等全面恶化。我们研究了疫情期间主观工作条件(工作压力和工作与生活平衡)中的职业不平等。我们使用了四波具有代表性的、基于概率的荷兰COVID性别(In)平等调查(COGIS - NL),该调查于2020年4月至2020年11月在荷兰收集。结果表明,与大流行前相比,大流行期间报告的工作压力更高,特别是在管理人员、专业人员和白领工人中。在大流行期间难以兼顾工作和护理的可能性方面也存在职业差异,管理人员和专业人员最有可能报告遇到困难。在控制了被调查者和工作特征后,这些差异不再明显。这一关于劳动人口主观工作条件职业差异的纵向证据有助于更好地了解在整个大流行病期间产生和发展的社会不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Sociological Inquiry (SI) is committed to the exploration of the human condition in all of its social and cultural complexity. Its papers challenge us to look anew at traditional areas or identify novel areas for investigation. SI publishes both theoretical and empirical work as well as varied research methods in the study of social and cultural life.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory Race‐Related Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among U.S. Black Women Attending a Historically Black University: Are Psychosocial Resources Stress Buffers? Working Time, Income Inequality, and Life Expectancy: A Longitudinal Analysis of US States, 2005–2018 “We May Look Like Cream‐of‐the‐Crop Kids, but it's Tough Here”: Elite Identity, Emotional Burden, and Ethical Transgressions Among Students at an Elite High School “Don't Touch!”: The Role of Cultural Knowledge in Low‐SES Parents' Perceptions of Museums Does Social Trust Travel? Comparing Resident and Non‐resident Citizens from a High‐Trusting Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1