Knowledge and Attitude towards Risk Factors and Complications of Diabetes among Housekeeping Staff at a Tertiary Care Center in India

IF 0.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Diabetology Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.5603/cd.96550
Sushma H. Nayak, Saleena Ummer Velladath, Kalaivani Manokaran, Venilla Jaganathan, Anju Muraleedharan
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitude towards Risk Factors and Complications of Diabetes among Housekeeping Staff at a Tertiary Care Center in India","authors":"Sushma H. Nayak, Saleena Ummer Velladath, Kalaivani Manokaran, Venilla Jaganathan, Anju Muraleedharan","doi":"10.5603/cd.96550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude towards risk factors and complications of diabetes among housekeeping workers. Material and methods: After obtaining institutional ethics approval, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among housekeeping staff working in a tertiary care center with an age group ranging from 18 to 60 years to assess knowledge and attitude towards risk factors and complications of diabetes. The correlation between knowledge and attitude scores was determined using Karl Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Results: A total of 287 housekeeping staff, with majority of females (73.9%) were included in the study. The average knowledge score was 16.24 ± 6.74, and the average attitude score was 7.22 ± 1.27. A weak correlation between knowledge and attitude scores was observed with a coefficient of 0.215 (p < 0.01). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that total knowledge and attitude scores and previously counseled people were statistically significant. Conclusions: The findings revealed that the overall level of knowledge about diabetes among housekeeping staff is poor, but the overall attitude is positive. There was a weak correlation between knowledge and attitude scores. Coordinated educational initiatives focusing on lower socioeconomic background, rural, and less educated individuals are needed to avoid diabetes and its complications.","PeriodicalId":10386,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cd.96550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude towards risk factors and complications of diabetes among housekeeping workers. Material and methods: After obtaining institutional ethics approval, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among housekeeping staff working in a tertiary care center with an age group ranging from 18 to 60 years to assess knowledge and attitude towards risk factors and complications of diabetes. The correlation between knowledge and attitude scores was determined using Karl Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Results: A total of 287 housekeeping staff, with majority of females (73.9%) were included in the study. The average knowledge score was 16.24 ± 6.74, and the average attitude score was 7.22 ± 1.27. A weak correlation between knowledge and attitude scores was observed with a coefficient of 0.215 (p < 0.01). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that total knowledge and attitude scores and previously counseled people were statistically significant. Conclusions: The findings revealed that the overall level of knowledge about diabetes among housekeeping staff is poor, but the overall attitude is positive. There was a weak correlation between knowledge and attitude scores. Coordinated educational initiatives focusing on lower socioeconomic background, rural, and less educated individuals are needed to avoid diabetes and its complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度某三级保健中心家政人员对糖尿病危险因素及并发症的知识和态度
目的:了解家政人员对糖尿病危险因素及并发症的认知和态度。材料与方法:在获得机构伦理批准后,对某三级保健中心家政人员进行横断面调查,调查对象年龄在18 ~ 60岁之间,评估其对糖尿病危险因素及并发症的知识和态度。运用卡尔·皮尔逊相关系数分析确定知识与态度得分之间的相关关系。结果:共纳入287名家政人员,其中以女性居多(73.9%)。平均知识得分为16.24±6.74分,平均态度得分为7.22±1.27分。知识与态度得分呈弱相关,相关系数为0.215 (p <0.01)。多元线性回归分析显示,总知识和态度得分与之前接受过咨询的人有统计学意义。结论:调查结果显示,客房部员工对糖尿病的总体知识水平较低,但总体态度是积极的。知识和态度得分之间的相关性较弱。需要针对社会经济背景较低、农村和受教育程度较低的个体开展协调一致的教育活动,以避免糖尿病及其并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Diabetology
Clinical Diabetology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Diabetology hereinafter referred to as ‘CD’ or ′the Journal′, is a peer-reviewed, open access journal covering broad spectrum of topics in diabetology and aiming to advance the knowledge and science of this rapidly evolving field. The Journal is the official bimonthly of the Diabetes Poland (Polish Diabetes Association) and publishes review articles, original clinical and experimental investigations in the field of diabetology, case reports, letters and editorial comments . The Journal has been published in full text English since 2016.
期刊最新文献
SGLT2 Inhibitor Significantly Improved Plasma Glucose Levels in a Patient with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adults: A Case Report 'Clinical Diabetology': Highlights of 2023 and Future Direction Association of Bone Turnover Biomarkers and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes: A Case-Control Study Association between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components in Older Adults: Findings from Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA) A Practical Approach to the Initiation, Titration and Intensification of Insulin Therapy in Adults with Diabetes in the Indian Context: Recommendations by Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1