Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in donations after cardiac death or brain death: A single-center experience and long-term outcome

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1002/ags3.12749
Chia-En Hsieh, Ya-Lan Hsu, Yao-Li Chen, Hsin-Rou Liang, Kuo-Hua Lin, Wen-Yuan Chen, Hsiu-Man Wu, Sin-Bao Hunang, Yu-Ju Hung
{"title":"Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in donations after cardiac death or brain death: A single-center experience and long-term outcome","authors":"Chia-En Hsieh,&nbsp;Ya-Lan Hsu,&nbsp;Yao-Li Chen,&nbsp;Hsin-Rou Liang,&nbsp;Kuo-Hua Lin,&nbsp;Wen-Yuan Chen,&nbsp;Hsiu-Man Wu,&nbsp;Sin-Bao Hunang,&nbsp;Yu-Ju Hung","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The use of extended criteria donors is a routine practice that sometimes involves extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in donations after cardiac death or brain death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective study in a single center from January 2006 to December 2019. The study included 90 deceased donor liver transplants. The patients were divided into three groups: the donation after brain death (DBD) group (<i>n</i> = 58, 64.4%), the DBD with ECMO group (<i>n</i> = 11, 12.2%) and the donation after cardiac death (DCD) with ECMO group (<i>n</i> = 21, 23.3%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no significant differences between the DBD with ECMO group and the DBD group. When comparing the DCD with ECMO group and the DBD group, there were statistically significant differences for total warm ischemia time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), total cold ischemia time (<i>p</i> = 0.023), and split liver transplantation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and there was significantly poor recovery in regard to total bilirubin level (<i>p</i> = 0.027) for the DCD with ECMO group by repeated measures ANOVA. The 5-year survival rates of the DBD, DBD with ECMO, and DCD with ECMO groups were 78.1%, 90.9%, and 75.6%, respectively. The survival rate was not significantly different when comparing the DBD group to either the DBD with ECMO group (<i>p</i> = 0.435) or the DCD with ECMO group (<i>p</i> = 0.310).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Using ECMO in donations after cardiac death or brain death is a good technology, and it contributed to 35.6% of the liver graft pool.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"8 2","pages":"312-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12749","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The use of extended criteria donors is a routine practice that sometimes involves extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in donations after cardiac death or brain death.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study in a single center from January 2006 to December 2019. The study included 90 deceased donor liver transplants. The patients were divided into three groups: the donation after brain death (DBD) group (n = 58, 64.4%), the DBD with ECMO group (n = 11, 12.2%) and the donation after cardiac death (DCD) with ECMO group (n = 21, 23.3%).

Results

There were no significant differences between the DBD with ECMO group and the DBD group. When comparing the DCD with ECMO group and the DBD group, there were statistically significant differences for total warm ischemia time (p < 0.001), total cold ischemia time (p = 0.023), and split liver transplantation (p < 0.001), and there was significantly poor recovery in regard to total bilirubin level (p = 0.027) for the DCD with ECMO group by repeated measures ANOVA. The 5-year survival rates of the DBD, DBD with ECMO, and DCD with ECMO groups were 78.1%, 90.9%, and 75.6%, respectively. The survival rate was not significantly different when comparing the DBD group to either the DBD with ECMO group (p = 0.435) or the DCD with ECMO group (p = 0.310).

Conclusions

Using ECMO in donations after cardiac death or brain death is a good technology, and it contributed to 35.6% of the liver graft pool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在心脏死亡或脑死亡后的捐赠中使用体外膜氧合:单个中心的经验和长期结果
目的 在心脏死亡或脑死亡后的捐献中,使用扩展标准捐献者是一种常规做法,有时涉及体外膜氧合(ECMO)。 方法 我们在一个中心进行了一项回顾性研究,研究时间为 2006 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月。研究包括 90 例死亡供体肝移植。患者分为三组:脑死亡后捐献(DBD)组(n = 58,64.4%)、DBD 合并 ECMO 组(n = 11,12.2%)和心脏死亡后捐献(DCD)合并 ECMO 组(n = 21,23.3%)。 结果 有 ECMO 的 DBD 组与 DBD 组之间无明显差异。经重复测量方差分析,DCD伴ECMO组与DBD组在总温热缺血时间(p <0.001)、总冷缺血时间(p = 0.023)和分肝移植(p <0.001)方面差异有统计学意义,而DCD伴ECMO组在总胆红素水平(p = 0.027)方面恢复明显较差。DBD组、DBD伴ECMO组和DCD伴ECMO组的5年存活率分别为78.1%、90.9%和75.6%。DBD 组与 DBD 伴 ECMO 组(P = 0.435)或 DCD 伴 ECMO 组(P = 0.310)相比,存活率无明显差异。 结论 在心脏死亡或脑死亡后的捐献中使用 ECMO 是一项很好的技术,它占肝脏移植库的 35.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Message From the New Editor-In-Chief: Advancing AGSurg Into a Leading International Surgical Journal Acknowledgments Issue Information Unexpectedly High Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Received Conversion Surgery After Nivolumab-Including Chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1