Effects of the combination of phytosanitary products and entomopathogenic fungi for the control of insect pests

Anahi Musso, Claudia Cristina Lopez Lastra, Susana Beatriz Padin, Graciela Monica Minardi, Jose Eduardo Marcondes Almeida
{"title":"Effects of the combination of phytosanitary products and entomopathogenic fungi for the control of insect pests","authors":"Anahi Musso, Claudia Cristina Lopez Lastra, Susana Beatriz Padin, Graciela Monica Minardi, Jose Eduardo Marcondes Almeida","doi":"10.15446/acag.v71n2.97313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The combination of phytosanitary products (PPs) and entomopathogenic fungi (EF) can be used in integrated pest management (IPM) programs. The aim of the present work was to study the effects of PPs, commonly used in Argentina and Brazil, combined with Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Cordyceps (Isaria) fumosorosea, for the control of insect pests in the post-harvest of wheat, under laboratory and semi-field conditions. In vitro compatibility was assessed using the biological index (BI) based on the percentages of fungal vegetative growth, sporulation, and germination. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was evaluated under semi-field conditions. In all cases, PPs evaluated reduced the mean germination percentages as compared with the control. According to the BI, none of the treatments evaluated were compatible with any of the three isolates, except for the treatment L7 of Lambdacialotrine, which was moderately toxic on B. bassiana. Evaluated PPs did not affect the number of CFUs of B. bassiana or C. fumosorosea with respect to the control. In contrast, PPs affected the number of CFUs of M. anisopliae, independently of the persistence time of fungi on the grains. PPs and EF should be applied separately under semi-field conditions, however, further research under field conditions should be conducted to confirm the compatibility within an IPM strategy.","PeriodicalId":476429,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agronómica","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agronómica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v71n2.97313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of phytosanitary products (PPs) and entomopathogenic fungi (EF) can be used in integrated pest management (IPM) programs. The aim of the present work was to study the effects of PPs, commonly used in Argentina and Brazil, combined with Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Cordyceps (Isaria) fumosorosea, for the control of insect pests in the post-harvest of wheat, under laboratory and semi-field conditions. In vitro compatibility was assessed using the biological index (BI) based on the percentages of fungal vegetative growth, sporulation, and germination. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was evaluated under semi-field conditions. In all cases, PPs evaluated reduced the mean germination percentages as compared with the control. According to the BI, none of the treatments evaluated were compatible with any of the three isolates, except for the treatment L7 of Lambdacialotrine, which was moderately toxic on B. bassiana. Evaluated PPs did not affect the number of CFUs of B. bassiana or C. fumosorosea with respect to the control. In contrast, PPs affected the number of CFUs of M. anisopliae, independently of the persistence time of fungi on the grains. PPs and EF should be applied separately under semi-field conditions, however, further research under field conditions should be conducted to confirm the compatibility within an IPM strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物检疫产品与昆虫病原真菌联合防治害虫的效果
植物检疫产品(PPs)与昆虫病原真菌(EF)的结合可用于害虫综合治理(IPM)计划。本研究的目的是在实验室和半田间条件下,研究阿根廷和巴西常用的PPs与球孢白僵菌、绿僵菌和烟孢虫草联合施用对小麦收获后害虫的防治效果。体外相容性采用基于真菌营养生长、产孢和萌发百分比的生物指数(BI)进行评估。在半田间条件下对菌落形成单位(cfu)数量进行了评价。在所有情况下,与对照相比,施用PPs降低了平均发芽率。根据BI,除了L7的Lambdacialotrine对球孢白僵菌有中等毒性外,所有评估的处理都与三种分离株中的任何一种都不相容。与对照相比,经评估的PPs对球孢白僵菌和烟孢白僵菌的cfu数量没有影响。而PPs对绿僵菌cfu数量的影响与真菌在籽粒上的停留时间无关。在半野外条件下,PPs和EF应分别应用,但在野外条件下,应进行进一步的研究,以确认在IPM策略内的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calidad e inocuidad de los alimentos en redes alimentarias alternativas, estudio de casos en Medellín, Colombia. Influencia del abono verde en los atributos físicos de un Latosol Amarillo distrófico Formulación de fertilidad online para cultivos tropicales con base en análisis físico-químico del suelo Recubrimiento a base de almidón de plátano (Musa ABB) para la protección del plátano de exportación Análisis de estabilidad de biochar de residuos agroforestales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1