Influence of Compost and Farmyard Manure on Cassava Growth, Yield and Dry Matter Partitioning at Mvomero and Masasi Districts

John Constantine, Kallunde P. Sibuga, Angelika Hilbeck, Mawazo J. Shitindi
{"title":"Influence of Compost and Farmyard Manure on Cassava Growth, Yield and Dry Matter Partitioning at Mvomero and Masasi Districts","authors":"John Constantine, Kallunde P. Sibuga, Angelika Hilbeck, Mawazo J. Shitindi","doi":"10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i102216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Field experiments were conducted for two seasons: 2019/20 and 2020/21 under rain fed cropping seasons to determine yield response of cassava to compost (CP) and farmyard manure (FYM) application.
 Study Design: The experiments were laid out in a RCBD with three replications.
 Place and Duration of Study: Vianzi village in Mvomero district and Mumbaka village in Masasi district between December 2019 to November 2021.
 Methodology: At each site, Treatments involving CP and FYM tested separately at four different levels; 2.5 t ha-1, 5 t ha-1, 7.5 t ha-1 and a control (0 t ha-1) was included. Both CP and FYM treatment rates were applied by broadcasting method followed by incorporation into the soil prior to cassava planting. Data on cassava plant height and cassava stem girth were collected for assessment of cassava growth and data on number of tubers per plant, cassava root fresh and dry biomass were recorded for assessment of cassava yield.
 Results: At Mvomero site, a maximum significant (P=.01) cassava fresh weight (19.18 t ha-1) were obtained from the plots treated with 5 t ha-1 FYM giving yield advantage of 67.5% above the control in 2020/21. In the CP treated plots, a maximum significant (P =.001) yield (22.2 t ha-1) was obtained giving 69% yield advantage above the control in 2020/21. At Masasi site, a maximum of 24.3 t ha-1 cassava fresh weight were obtained in 2020/21 giving 77.7% yield advantage over the control. In the CP treated plots in 2020/21, 18.7 t ha-1 cassava fresh weight was obtained giving 34.6% yield advantage over control.
 Conclusion: Application of CP and FYM not only improve cassava yields as it is for inorganic fertilizers but also, they have an added advantage of improving soil health conditions in season and over years. For best results application of CP or FYM should be 5.0 t ha-1.","PeriodicalId":477440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental agriculture international","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental agriculture international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i102216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Field experiments were conducted for two seasons: 2019/20 and 2020/21 under rain fed cropping seasons to determine yield response of cassava to compost (CP) and farmyard manure (FYM) application. Study Design: The experiments were laid out in a RCBD with three replications. Place and Duration of Study: Vianzi village in Mvomero district and Mumbaka village in Masasi district between December 2019 to November 2021. Methodology: At each site, Treatments involving CP and FYM tested separately at four different levels; 2.5 t ha-1, 5 t ha-1, 7.5 t ha-1 and a control (0 t ha-1) was included. Both CP and FYM treatment rates were applied by broadcasting method followed by incorporation into the soil prior to cassava planting. Data on cassava plant height and cassava stem girth were collected for assessment of cassava growth and data on number of tubers per plant, cassava root fresh and dry biomass were recorded for assessment of cassava yield. Results: At Mvomero site, a maximum significant (P=.01) cassava fresh weight (19.18 t ha-1) were obtained from the plots treated with 5 t ha-1 FYM giving yield advantage of 67.5% above the control in 2020/21. In the CP treated plots, a maximum significant (P =.001) yield (22.2 t ha-1) was obtained giving 69% yield advantage above the control in 2020/21. At Masasi site, a maximum of 24.3 t ha-1 cassava fresh weight were obtained in 2020/21 giving 77.7% yield advantage over the control. In the CP treated plots in 2020/21, 18.7 t ha-1 cassava fresh weight was obtained giving 34.6% yield advantage over control. Conclusion: Application of CP and FYM not only improve cassava yields as it is for inorganic fertilizers but also, they have an added advantage of improving soil health conditions in season and over years. For best results application of CP or FYM should be 5.0 t ha-1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堆肥和农家肥对Mvomero和Masasi地区木薯生长、产量和干物质分配的影响
目的:通过2019/20和2020/21两个雨养季的田间试验,确定木薯对堆肥(CP)和农家肥(FYM)施用的产量响应。研究设计:实验在RCBD中进行,有三个重复。 学习地点和时间:2019年12月至2021年11月,mvmero地区Vianzi村和Masasi地区mumaka村;方法:在每个试验点,分别对CP和FYM处理进行四个不同水平的测试;包括2.5 t ha-1、5 t ha-1、7.5 t ha-1和对照组(0 t ha-1)。CP和FYM两种处理率均采用撒播法,在木薯种植前灌入土壤。收集木薯株高和茎周长数据,用于评估木薯生长;记录每株块茎数、木薯根鲜、干生物量数据,用于评估木薯产量。 结果:在Mvomero试验点,5 t ha-1 FYM处理的木薯鲜重(19.18 t ha-1)在2020/21年度最高(P= 0.01),产量比对照高出67.5%。在CP处理的地块,在2020/21年度获得了最大显著(P = 0.001)产量(22.2 t hm -1),比对照产量高出69%。在Masasi基地,2020/21年度木薯鲜重最高可达24.3 t hm -1,产量比对照高出77.7%。2020/21年度CP处理地块木薯鲜重18.7 t hm -1,产量较对照高出34.6%;结论:施用CP和FYM不仅可以像施用无机肥料一样提高木薯产量,而且具有改善土壤季节性和多年健康状况的附加优势。为获得最佳效果,CP或FYM的应用应为5.0 t ha-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response of Zinc and Panchagavya on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) Exploring Genetic Variability Parameters for Yield and Quality Traits in Urdbean Genotypes and Its Triple Test Cross F1 Hybrids Genetic Variability, Character Association and Path Analysis for Various Characters in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Assessing the Impact of Deficit Irrigation on Yield and Phenology of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Enhancing Timber and Medicinal Plant Resources: Propagation Techniques for Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss. in Tropical Regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1