Optic disc drusen and scleral canal size – protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Brémond-Gignac, Matthieu P. Robert
{"title":"Optic disc drusen and scleral canal size – protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Brémond-Gignac, Matthieu P. Robert","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2023.1256397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Around one in forty patients are diagnosed with optic disc drusen (ODD) during their lifetime. Complications of these acellular deposits range from asymptomatic visual field deficits to artery occlusion and subsequent cecity. Still, the pathogenesis of their emergence remains controversial. In particular, it was suggested 50 years ago that a narrow disc and scleral canal is one factor leading to axoplasmic flow disturbance, which induces ODD formation. However, this hypothesis is still debated today. To evaluate the basis of this theory, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD and in healthy subjects. Methods We will search MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE electronic databases to identify articles published before November 29, 2022 that measure the scleral canal size in patients with ODD and in healthy subjects. In addition, grey literature will be searched. The meta-analysis will include studies that include patients with a clinical or imaging diagnosis of ODD and healthy subjects. Additionally, we will perform a subgroup analysis to compare patients with buried ODD and patients with visible ODD. Extracted data from included studies will be presented descriptively, and effect sizes will be computed based on the recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration handbook. Discussion The hypothesis that a narrow scleral canal is a risk factor of ODD has long been debated and this systematic review and meta-analysis should disentangle the different views. Understanding the underlying factors driving the development of ODD should help us focus on patients at risk and develop strategies to prevent advanced stages of the disease in these patients. Besides, focusing on patients with small scleral canals should help us derive associated factors and provide a better understanding of the pathology. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022375110 .","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1256397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Around one in forty patients are diagnosed with optic disc drusen (ODD) during their lifetime. Complications of these acellular deposits range from asymptomatic visual field deficits to artery occlusion and subsequent cecity. Still, the pathogenesis of their emergence remains controversial. In particular, it was suggested 50 years ago that a narrow disc and scleral canal is one factor leading to axoplasmic flow disturbance, which induces ODD formation. However, this hypothesis is still debated today. To evaluate the basis of this theory, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD and in healthy subjects. Methods We will search MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE electronic databases to identify articles published before November 29, 2022 that measure the scleral canal size in patients with ODD and in healthy subjects. In addition, grey literature will be searched. The meta-analysis will include studies that include patients with a clinical or imaging diagnosis of ODD and healthy subjects. Additionally, we will perform a subgroup analysis to compare patients with buried ODD and patients with visible ODD. Extracted data from included studies will be presented descriptively, and effect sizes will be computed based on the recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration handbook. Discussion The hypothesis that a narrow scleral canal is a risk factor of ODD has long been debated and this systematic review and meta-analysis should disentangle the different views. Understanding the underlying factors driving the development of ODD should help us focus on patients at risk and develop strategies to prevent advanced stages of the disease in these patients. Besides, focusing on patients with small scleral canals should help us derive associated factors and provide a better understanding of the pathology. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022375110 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视盘结节和巩膜管大小——系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案
背景:每40名患者中就有1人在其一生中被诊断为视盘疲劳。这些非细胞沉积的并发症从无症状的视野缺损到动脉闭塞和随后的城市。尽管如此,它们出现的发病机制仍然存在争议。特别是,50年前就有人提出,狭窄的椎间盘和巩膜管是导致轴浆血流紊乱的一个因素,从而诱发ODD的形成。然而,这一假设至今仍有争议。为了评估这一理论的基础,我们将对ODD患者和健康受试者的巩膜管大小进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:我们将通过PubMed、Cochrane和EMBASE电子数据库检索MEDLINE,以确定2022年11月29日之前发表的测量ODD患者和健康受试者巩膜管大小的文章。此外,灰色文献将被搜索。荟萃分析将包括临床或影像学诊断为ODD的患者和健康受试者。此外,我们将进行亚组分析,比较隐匿性ODD患者和可见性ODD患者。从纳入的研究中提取的数据将描述性地呈现,效应量将根据Cochrane协作手册的建议计算。关于巩膜管狭窄是ODD危险因素的假设一直存在争议,本系统综述和荟萃分析应该能够理清不同的观点。了解驱动ODD发展的潜在因素应该有助于我们关注有风险的患者,并制定策略来预防这些患者的晚期疾病。此外,关注小巩膜管患者应有助于我们得出相关因素,并提供更好的病理理解。系统审查注册https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022375110。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1