Karla Cecilia Puerto-López, Félix Joaquín Lozano Cárdena, Byron Medina Delgado, Carlos Vicente Niño Rondón, Sergio Alexander Castro Casadiego
{"title":"Analysis of learning outcomes in engineering programs","authors":"Karla Cecilia Puerto-López, Félix Joaquín Lozano Cárdena, Byron Medina Delgado, Carlos Vicente Niño Rondón, Sergio Alexander Castro Casadiego","doi":"10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:The present review article is the product of the research “Teaching digital modulation techniques in engineering: experiential learning theory “ developed at the Franciso de Paula Santander University and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in 2022.Problem: The learning outcomes correspond to the statements related to what the future engineer is expected to be able to do, learn, understand and demonstrate. Objective: Analyze learning outcomes in engineering programs globally.Methodology: A methodology based on analysis stages is used for information selection through search filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria, design for the classification of information by geographic location and area of knowledge, with qualitative results by location and trends by area of knowledge.Results: Divergence was observed towards the way in which learning outcomes are evaluated, and conver-gence towards the need to involve agents external to the academy in the feedback for the learning outcomes evaluation processes.Conclusion:This allows for the identification of individual and collective strengths and weaknesses, which helps to make informed decisions to improve the quality of education.Originality:Originality is based on the way in which the information is analyzed, considering information by areas of knowledge as well as by continents.Limitations:None given the nature of the literature review.","PeriodicalId":41023,"journal":{"name":"Ingenieria Solidaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenieria Solidaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction:The present review article is the product of the research “Teaching digital modulation techniques in engineering: experiential learning theory “ developed at the Franciso de Paula Santander University and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in 2022.Problem: The learning outcomes correspond to the statements related to what the future engineer is expected to be able to do, learn, understand and demonstrate. Objective: Analyze learning outcomes in engineering programs globally.Methodology: A methodology based on analysis stages is used for information selection through search filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria, design for the classification of information by geographic location and area of knowledge, with qualitative results by location and trends by area of knowledge.Results: Divergence was observed towards the way in which learning outcomes are evaluated, and conver-gence towards the need to involve agents external to the academy in the feedback for the learning outcomes evaluation processes.Conclusion:This allows for the identification of individual and collective strengths and weaknesses, which helps to make informed decisions to improve the quality of education.Originality:Originality is based on the way in which the information is analyzed, considering information by areas of knowledge as well as by continents.Limitations:None given the nature of the literature review.
引言:本综述文章是2022年由Franciso de Paula Santander大学和Pontificia Universidad Javeriana大学开展的“工程中的数字调制技术教学:体验式学习理论”研究的成果。问题:学习结果与未来工程师被期望能够做、学习、理解和展示的相关陈述相对应。目的:分析全球工程项目的学习成果。方法:采用基于分析阶段的方法,通过搜索过滤器和包含和排除标准对信息进行选择,设计按地理位置和知识领域对信息进行分类,并根据位置和知识领域获得定性结果和趋势。结果:在评估学习成果的方式上观察到分歧,而在学习成果评估过程的反馈中涉及学院外部代理人的需求方面观察到趋同。结论:这允许识别个人和集体的优势和劣势,这有助于做出明智的决定,以提高教育质量。原创性:原创性是基于分析信息的方式,根据知识领域和大洲来考虑信息。局限性:没有考虑到文献综述的性质。