Trust, Transparency, and Complexity

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Financial Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhad011
Richard T Thakor, Robert C Merton
{"title":"Trust, Transparency, and Complexity","authors":"Richard T Thakor, Robert C Merton","doi":"10.1093/rfs/hhad011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper develops a theory that generates an equilibrium relationship between product complexity, transparency, and trust in firms. Complexity, transparency, and the evolution of trust are all endogenous, and equilibrium transparency is nonmonotonic. The least-trusted firms choose the lowest product complexity, remain opaque, and substitute ex ante third-party verification for information disclosure and trust. Firms with an intermediate level of trust choose an intermediate level of complexity and transparency through disclosure, with more trusted firms choosing greater complexity and lower transparency. The most-trusted firms choose maximum complexity while remaining opaque, eschewing both verification and disclosure.","PeriodicalId":21124,"journal":{"name":"Review of Financial Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops a theory that generates an equilibrium relationship between product complexity, transparency, and trust in firms. Complexity, transparency, and the evolution of trust are all endogenous, and equilibrium transparency is nonmonotonic. The least-trusted firms choose the lowest product complexity, remain opaque, and substitute ex ante third-party verification for information disclosure and trust. Firms with an intermediate level of trust choose an intermediate level of complexity and transparency through disclosure, with more trusted firms choosing greater complexity and lower transparency. The most-trusted firms choose maximum complexity while remaining opaque, eschewing both verification and disclosure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任、透明度和复杂性
摘要本文发展了一个理论,在产品复杂性、透明度和企业信任之间产生了均衡关系。复杂性、透明度和信任的演化都是内生的,均衡透明度是非单调的。最不受信任的公司选择最低的产品复杂性,保持不透明,并以事先第三方验证代替信息披露和信任。具有中等信任水平的企业通过披露选择中等程度的复杂性和透明度,具有较高信任水平的企业选择较高的复杂性和较低的透明度。最受信任的公司选择最大程度的复杂性,同时保持不透明,避免核实和披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: The Review of Financial Studies is a prominent platform that aims to foster and widely distribute noteworthy research in financial economics. With an expansive editorial board, the Review strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical contributions. The primary focus of paper selection is based on the quality and significance of the research to the field of finance, rather than its level of technical complexity. The scope of finance within the Review encompasses its intersection with economics. Sponsoring The Society for Financial Studies, the Review and the Society appoint editors and officers through limited terms.
期刊最新文献
Pay-As-You-Go Insurance: Experimental Evidence on Consumer Demand and Behavior Exchange Rate Dynamics and Monetary Spillovers with Imperfect Financial Markets Gender Bias in Promotions: Evidence from Financial Institutions The Cost of Bank Regulatory Capital Desperate House Sellers: Distress among Developers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1