Daniel Pimentel, Lauro C Vianna, Felipe Pimentel, Concepta McManus
{"title":"Bibliometric indicators in Physical Education research: Brazil in comparison","authors":"Daniel Pimentel, Lauro C Vianna, Felipe Pimentel, Concepta McManus","doi":"10.1590/rbce.44.e20230015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scopus and Web of Science were used to evaluate papers on Physical Education worldwide and in Brazil. Most documents are published in the USA and England, Brazil being the 6th largest. Brazilians tend to publish in Brazil. Countries with a higher % of documents in Q1 journals have higher % of top 10% cited documents. Most countries increase their Top 10% score when publishing in open access, while Brazil decreases. Differentiation between country clusters is due to % documents in Q1 journals, international collaboration, Open Access, citations/paper and documents in Top 10%. Brazil researches similar topics to those worldwide. Publishing in Q1 journals, and more industry and international collaboration can increase the impact of publications by Brazilian authors.","PeriodicalId":38234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias do Esporte","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias do Esporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/rbce.44.e20230015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Scopus and Web of Science were used to evaluate papers on Physical Education worldwide and in Brazil. Most documents are published in the USA and England, Brazil being the 6th largest. Brazilians tend to publish in Brazil. Countries with a higher % of documents in Q1 journals have higher % of top 10% cited documents. Most countries increase their Top 10% score when publishing in open access, while Brazil decreases. Differentiation between country clusters is due to % documents in Q1 journals, international collaboration, Open Access, citations/paper and documents in Top 10%. Brazil researches similar topics to those worldwide. Publishing in Q1 journals, and more industry and international collaboration can increase the impact of publications by Brazilian authors.
使用Scopus和Web of Science对全球和巴西的体育论文进行评估。大多数文件发表在美国和英国，巴西是第六大。巴西人倾向于在巴西出版。论文在Q1期刊中所占比例较高的国家，其论文被引用前10%的比例也较高。大多数国家在发表开放获取论文时，前10%的得分都有所提高，而巴西则有所下降。国家集群之间的差异是由于Q1期刊中的文件百分比，国际合作，开放获取，引文/论文和前10%的文件。巴西研究的课题与世界各国相似。在Q1期刊上发表文章，以及更多的行业和国际合作可以提高巴西作者的出版物的影响力。
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
