The Ideas of Biblical Poetry: Aesthetics and Literary History

IF 0.2 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE PROOFTEXTS-A JOURNAL OF JEWISH LITERARY HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2979/ptx.2023.a899247
Elaine T. James, Steven Weitzman
{"title":"The Ideas of Biblical Poetry: Aesthetics and Literary History","authors":"Elaine T. James, Steven Weitzman","doi":"10.2979/ptx.2023.a899247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ideas of Biblical PoetryAesthetics and Literary History Elaine T. James and Steven Weitzman While the study of biblical poetry has a venerable history of scholarship, at least since Robert Lowth’s De Sacra Poesi Hebraeorum Praelectiones Academicae Oxonii Habitae (1753), the modern literary study of the Bible since the 1980s has had much more to say about biblical prose, focusing much of its energy on analyzing narratives in works like Genesis and 1–2 Samuel. In 2007, for example, Prooftexts published a special issue dedicated to the legacy of Robert Alter and the literary study of the Bible. The essays in that volume dealt almost exclusively with what Alter had termed “the art of biblical narrative.” In the years since 2007, however, there has been a distinct rise in interest in the study of biblical poetry among scholars committed to the aesthetic turn championed by Alter and others, although they have taken research in new directions. This special issue of Prooftexts seeks to advance this conversation by calling attention to research that probes the historically contextualized ideas of biblical poetry—how biblical poetry has been received as poetry in different periods. Philip Sidney’s sophisticated and pithy Defence of Poesie, published posthumously in 1595, offers one example of a thinker grappling with ideas about poetry through the lens of biblical aesthetics. For Sidney, the valor and possibility of poetry [End Page 1] is modeled by the Bible itself, which, he noted, “hath whole parts in it poetical.”1 We point to this example because it represents a turning point in literary study and anticipates the influential work of both Lowth and Johann Gottfried Herder, forerunner of German Romanticism, two centuries and more later.2 Within the intellectual stream of European Romanticism and the rise of the university in the early modern period, these scholars brought Sidney’s passing observations into full critical examination. Lowth shed light on parallelism, a common technique in Psalms and other biblical poetic texts that he regarded as the central formal dimension of Israelite poetry. Herder pioneered a comparative approach that situated the question of poetry in a larger intellectual project of understanding the unique contributions of traditional cultures; this insight, along with his development of a philosophy of language and interpretation, led to the rise of new fields of study: linguistics, cultural anthropology, and ethnomusicology, among others. The combined influence of their scholarship elevated biblical poetry to the status of literary transcendence, a model of how to express intense emotion and the experience of the sublime. In the aesthetic turn, biblical poetry found a distinctive place in the intellectual history of poetry. The effort to understand the aesthetic dimensions of biblical poetry continued into the late twentieth century, and the subject served as something of a cultural flashpoint in the heyday of American literary criticism. In 1981, the year that Prooftexts published its first issue, James Kugel published The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History.3 Alter himself followed The Art of Biblical Narrative with The Art of Biblical Poetry in 1985 and, not long afterward, the wide-ranging volume co-edited with Frank Kermode, The Literary Guide to the Bible (1987). This array of volumes in fairly quick succession attests to the institutionalization of the literary approach to the Bible, which these scholars championed over against the historical criticism that had long characterized modern biblical scholarship.4 It is useful to remember, of course, that this flashpoint is only one moment in a complex history. Biblical scholars such as Hermann Gunkel, Luis Alonso Schökel, and Michael Patrick O’Connor all also wrestled with the notion that the Bible contains or is poetry and privileged a deep commitment to formal description and to the significance of verbal art in ancient Israelite culture.5 Such work reminds the reader of the diverse and [End Page 2] unpredictable paths the study of biblical poetry has taken and provides a general affirmation of Sidney’s sense that the recognition of a body of literature in the Bible as poetry is both useful and continues to require defense. But Alter and Kugel in particular—the former a scholar of comparative literature and the...","PeriodicalId":43444,"journal":{"name":"PROOFTEXTS-A JOURNAL OF JEWISH LITERARY HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROOFTEXTS-A JOURNAL OF JEWISH LITERARY HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/ptx.2023.a899247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ideas of Biblical PoetryAesthetics and Literary History Elaine T. James and Steven Weitzman While the study of biblical poetry has a venerable history of scholarship, at least since Robert Lowth’s De Sacra Poesi Hebraeorum Praelectiones Academicae Oxonii Habitae (1753), the modern literary study of the Bible since the 1980s has had much more to say about biblical prose, focusing much of its energy on analyzing narratives in works like Genesis and 1–2 Samuel. In 2007, for example, Prooftexts published a special issue dedicated to the legacy of Robert Alter and the literary study of the Bible. The essays in that volume dealt almost exclusively with what Alter had termed “the art of biblical narrative.” In the years since 2007, however, there has been a distinct rise in interest in the study of biblical poetry among scholars committed to the aesthetic turn championed by Alter and others, although they have taken research in new directions. This special issue of Prooftexts seeks to advance this conversation by calling attention to research that probes the historically contextualized ideas of biblical poetry—how biblical poetry has been received as poetry in different periods. Philip Sidney’s sophisticated and pithy Defence of Poesie, published posthumously in 1595, offers one example of a thinker grappling with ideas about poetry through the lens of biblical aesthetics. For Sidney, the valor and possibility of poetry [End Page 1] is modeled by the Bible itself, which, he noted, “hath whole parts in it poetical.”1 We point to this example because it represents a turning point in literary study and anticipates the influential work of both Lowth and Johann Gottfried Herder, forerunner of German Romanticism, two centuries and more later.2 Within the intellectual stream of European Romanticism and the rise of the university in the early modern period, these scholars brought Sidney’s passing observations into full critical examination. Lowth shed light on parallelism, a common technique in Psalms and other biblical poetic texts that he regarded as the central formal dimension of Israelite poetry. Herder pioneered a comparative approach that situated the question of poetry in a larger intellectual project of understanding the unique contributions of traditional cultures; this insight, along with his development of a philosophy of language and interpretation, led to the rise of new fields of study: linguistics, cultural anthropology, and ethnomusicology, among others. The combined influence of their scholarship elevated biblical poetry to the status of literary transcendence, a model of how to express intense emotion and the experience of the sublime. In the aesthetic turn, biblical poetry found a distinctive place in the intellectual history of poetry. The effort to understand the aesthetic dimensions of biblical poetry continued into the late twentieth century, and the subject served as something of a cultural flashpoint in the heyday of American literary criticism. In 1981, the year that Prooftexts published its first issue, James Kugel published The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History.3 Alter himself followed The Art of Biblical Narrative with The Art of Biblical Poetry in 1985 and, not long afterward, the wide-ranging volume co-edited with Frank Kermode, The Literary Guide to the Bible (1987). This array of volumes in fairly quick succession attests to the institutionalization of the literary approach to the Bible, which these scholars championed over against the historical criticism that had long characterized modern biblical scholarship.4 It is useful to remember, of course, that this flashpoint is only one moment in a complex history. Biblical scholars such as Hermann Gunkel, Luis Alonso Schökel, and Michael Patrick O’Connor all also wrestled with the notion that the Bible contains or is poetry and privileged a deep commitment to formal description and to the significance of verbal art in ancient Israelite culture.5 Such work reminds the reader of the diverse and [End Page 2] unpredictable paths the study of biblical poetry has taken and provides a general affirmation of Sidney’s sense that the recognition of a body of literature in the Bible as poetry is both useful and continues to require defense. But Alter and Kugel in particular—the former a scholar of comparative literature and the...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《圣经》诗歌观念:美学与文学史
《圣经》诗歌美学与文学史研究《圣经》诗歌美学与文学史研究《圣经》诗歌美学与文学史的研究历史悠久,至少从罗伯特·洛斯(Robert Lowth)于1753年出版的《论圣经》(De Sacra Poesi Hebraeorum Praelectiones Academicae Oxonii Habitae)开始,但自20世纪80年代以来,对《圣经》的现代文学研究更多地涉及《圣经》散文,将大部分精力集中在《创世纪》和《撒母耳记1-2》等作品的叙事分析上。例如,2007年,Prooftexts出版了一期特刊,专门讨论罗伯特·阿尔特的遗产和圣经文学研究。这本书里的文章几乎都是关于阿尔特所谓的“圣经叙事艺术”的。然而,自2007年以来,致力于Alter等人倡导的美学转向的学者对圣经诗歌研究的兴趣明显上升,尽管他们已经将研究方向转向了新的方向。这期《校对》特刊试图通过引起人们对《圣经》诗歌的历史语境化思想的研究的关注来推进这一对话——《圣经》诗歌在不同时期是如何被当作诗歌接受的。菲利普•西德尼(Philip Sidney)于1595年死后出版的《为诗辩护》(Defence of Poesie)精辟而精辟,是一位思想家通过《圣经》美学的视角思考诗歌思想的一个例子。对西德尼来说,诗歌的勇气和可能性是由《圣经》本身塑造的,他指出,《圣经》“包含了全部的诗意”。我们指出这个例子,是因为它代表了文学研究的一个转折点,并预示了两个多世纪后洛斯和德国浪漫主义先驱约翰·戈特弗里德·赫德(Johann Gottfried Herder)有影响力的作品在近代早期欧洲浪漫主义思潮和大学兴起的背景下,这些学者对西德尼的偶然观察进行了全面的批判性考察。洛斯阐明了平行,这是诗篇和其他圣经诗歌文本中常见的一种技巧,他认为这是以色列诗歌的中心形式维度。赫尔德开创了一种比较方法,将诗歌问题置于一个更大的理解传统文化独特贡献的智力项目中;这一见解,连同他对语言和阐释哲学的发展,导致了语言学、文化人类学和民族音乐学等新研究领域的兴起。他们学术的共同影响将圣经诗歌提升到文学超越的地位,是如何表达强烈情感和崇高体验的典范。在审美转向中,圣经诗歌在诗歌思想史上占有独特的地位。对《圣经》诗歌美学维度的理解一直持续到20世纪后期,在美国文学批评的全盛时期,这一主题在某种程度上成为了文化的导火索。1981年,《校对》杂志出版了第一期,詹姆斯·库格尔出版了《圣经诗歌的思想:平行及其历史》。阿尔特本人在《圣经叙事的艺术》之后,于1985年出版了《圣经诗歌的艺术》,不久之后,又与弗兰克·克莫德合编了《圣经文学指南》(1987年)。这一系列快速连续的卷证明了对圣经的文学方法的制度化,这些学者支持这种方法来反对长期以来以现代圣经学术为特征的历史批评当然,有必要记住,这个爆发点只是复杂历史中的一个时刻。Hermann Gunkel, Luis Alonso Schökel和Michael Patrick O 'Connor等圣经学者也都在争论《圣经》包含或就是诗歌的概念,并对正式描述和古代以色列文化中语言艺术的意义给予了深刻的承诺这样的作品提醒读者圣经诗歌研究的多样化和不可预测的路径,并为西德尼的观点提供了一个普遍的肯定,即承认圣经中的文学作品是诗歌是有用的,但仍然需要辩护。但尤其是阿尔特和库格尔,前者是比较文学学者,后者是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For sixteen years, Prooftexts: A Journal of Jewish Literary History has brought to the study of Jewish literature, in its many guises and periods, new methods of study and a new wholeness of approach. A unique exchange has taken place between Israeli and American scholars, as more work from Israelis has appeared in the journal. Prooftexts" thematic issues have made important contributions to the field.
期刊最新文献
Coleridge’s Translation of the Song of Deborah On the Politics of Parallelism: Biblical Allusions in Spenser’s The Faerie Queene Imagining the Hebrew Ode: On Robert Lowth’s Biblical Species Alicia Suskin Ostriker’s Feminist Poetics: Reading Biblical Poetry as Countertheology On the Uses of Biblical Poetics: Protestant Hermeneutics and American Jewish Self-Fashioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1