Ethnicity Does Not Impact Physical Therapy Students’ Clinical Readiness and Performance, a United States Exploratory Study

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2225
Derrick Campbell, Jean-Michel Brismee, Brad Allen, Troy Hooper, Manuel Domenech, Kathleen Manella
{"title":"Ethnicity Does Not Impact Physical Therapy Students’ Clinical Readiness and Performance, a United States Exploratory Study","authors":"Derrick Campbell, Jean-Michel Brismee, Brad Allen, Troy Hooper, Manuel Domenech, Kathleen Manella","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To explore the impact of ethnicity on clinical readiness and performance among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students, as determined by 1) Physical Therapist Self-Efficacy (PTSE) score, 2) self-confidence treating patients, and 3) final American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) clinical reasoning and summative ratings during clinical experiences. Methods: This study is a survey-based, descriptive, and exploratory cross-sectional research design involving sample of 211 DPT students evaluated for differences across ethnic students’ groups 1) PTSE score during student clinical experiences, 2) confidence with treating initial and subsequent same-patient visits, and 3) final CPI clinical reasoning and summative scores during clinical experiences. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test showed no difference across ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic, White or Caucasian, prefer not to answer, and multiple ethnicity) in 1) clinical reasoning self-efficacy (PTSE), n=211, p=.438; 2) confidence treating at initial visit n=211, p=.088 and subsequent patient visits n=211, p=.584; and 3) clinical performance on the CPI for clinical reasoning n=211, p=.273 and summative n=211, p=.189 scores. Conclusions and Recommendations: All ethnic groups demonstrated strong clinical readiness and performance during each clinical experience level. Ethnic groups did not differ on clinical reasoning self-efficacy or confidence treating patients. Although the gap appears to be closing, there continues to be underrepresentation of ethnic groups in DPT programs. We recommend investigating factors impacting underrepresentation of ethnic groups in DPT academic programs to explore initiatives to close the diversity gap and best match societal representation.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the impact of ethnicity on clinical readiness and performance among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students, as determined by 1) Physical Therapist Self-Efficacy (PTSE) score, 2) self-confidence treating patients, and 3) final American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) clinical reasoning and summative ratings during clinical experiences. Methods: This study is a survey-based, descriptive, and exploratory cross-sectional research design involving sample of 211 DPT students evaluated for differences across ethnic students’ groups 1) PTSE score during student clinical experiences, 2) confidence with treating initial and subsequent same-patient visits, and 3) final CPI clinical reasoning and summative scores during clinical experiences. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test showed no difference across ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic, White or Caucasian, prefer not to answer, and multiple ethnicity) in 1) clinical reasoning self-efficacy (PTSE), n=211, p=.438; 2) confidence treating at initial visit n=211, p=.088 and subsequent patient visits n=211, p=.584; and 3) clinical performance on the CPI for clinical reasoning n=211, p=.273 and summative n=211, p=.189 scores. Conclusions and Recommendations: All ethnic groups demonstrated strong clinical readiness and performance during each clinical experience level. Ethnic groups did not differ on clinical reasoning self-efficacy or confidence treating patients. Although the gap appears to be closing, there continues to be underrepresentation of ethnic groups in DPT programs. We recommend investigating factors impacting underrepresentation of ethnic groups in DPT academic programs to explore initiatives to close the diversity gap and best match societal representation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族不影响物理治疗学生的临床准备和表现,一项美国探索性研究
目的:探讨种族对物理治疗博士(DPT)学生临床准备和临床表现的影响,包括1)物理治疗师自我效能(PTSE)评分,2)治疗患者的自信心,以及3)美国物理治疗协会(APTA)临床表现工具(CPI)临床推理和总结评分。方法:本研究采用基于调查的、描述性的、探索性的横断面研究设计,以211名DPT学生为样本,评估不同民族学生群体的差异:1)学生临床体验期间的PTSE得分;2)对初次和后续同患者就诊的信心;3)临床体验期间的CPI临床推理和总结得分。结果:Kruskal-Wallis检验显示不同种族(美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民、亚洲/太平洋岛民、黑人或非裔美国人、西班牙裔、白人或高加索人、不愿回答、多种族)在1)临床推理自我效能(PTSE)方面无差异,n=211, p=.438;2)初访时置信度处理n=211, p=。088例及后续患者就诊n=211, p=.584;3)临床表现对临床推理CPI的影响n=211, p=。273,求和式n=211, p=。189的分数。结论和建议:所有种族在每个临床经验水平上都表现出很强的临床准备和表现。不同种族在临床推理、自我效能和自信治疗患者方面没有差异。虽然差距似乎正在缩小,但在DPT项目中,少数民族的代表性仍然不足。我们建议调查影响DPT学术课程中少数民族代表性不足的因素,以探索缩小多样性差距和最佳匹配社会代表性的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
DTSaM を用いた橈骨遠位端骨折の治療成績 スマートフォンを用いた反張膝の測定方法に対する予備的研究 自閉スペクトラム症児における日本版感覚プロファイルを用いた感覚反応に対する幼児と学齢児の比較 介護老人保健施設における日常生活動作能力と転帰先との関連性 Effectiveness of WiiⓇ-based rehabilitation in Patients with Brain Tumors:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1